How maps confirm anti-migrant bias

'Battlefield maps' show continent under attack from hostile invaders.

Image: De Correspondent, reproduced with kind permission.
  • Maps aren't objective. And migration maps aren't innocent.
  • Consciously or not, their content and form can confirm anti-migrant prejudices.
  • Alternative mapping options are available – but perhaps the answer isn't a map at all.
Keep reading Show less

Politics really do alter your perception of reality

According to Harvard economists, Democrats and Republicans both perceive reality very wrong.

  • A working paper by Harvard economists shows how political perceptions deform our understanding of otherwise verifiable facts.
  • Both Democrat and Republicans overestimate social mobility, underestimate the top tax bracket, and have no clue what's happening with foreign-born citizens.
  • The researchers hope their findings will help us understand how to intervene in the cycle of misinformation.
  • Keep reading Show less

    Are these the fracture lines that will break the EU?

    Europe's border closures due to coronavirus go against a fundamental freedom enshrined in the Schengen Agreement.

    Image: Political Geography Now - base map by Ssolberj (CC BY-SA 3.0)
    • Most EU members have shut their borders to limit coronavirus infection.
    • While understandable, it also goes against one of Europe's most fundamental freedoms.
    • In the longer run, these border closures could threaten the very existence of the EU itself.

    Keep reading Show less

    What authority should government have over our actions?

    The ability to interact peacefully and voluntarily provides individuals a better quality of life.

    • In classical liberal philosophy, voluntary action says the scope of legitimate government authority is extremely narrow.
    • While not all classical liberals agree on immigration policy, the question remains: What right does a government have to stop someone from moving to another country should they so choose?
    • As an immigrant, himself, Georgetown University professor Peter Jaworski invites us to consider the freest countries in the world and examine the economic freedom and civil liberties their citizens enjoy.

    'Universal basic income is a brilliant idea'. Here's why.

    The welfare state is broken. UBI is the smarter, more effective option.

    • The welfare state is an ineffective and expensive system that hurts and targets the poor more than it helps. Universal basic income is a better alternative that could work.
    • The question becomes, then, where would the money for UBI come from? There are a myriad of reasons why UBI via taxes would be a bad idea. Instead, we should look to socially produced capital.
    • Companies rely on people to be successful, so a percentage of all shares of all companies should go into a public equity trust and the dividends should be distributed to every member of society equally.

    Keep reading Show less
    Quantcast