Zizek is on the left and dislikes political correctness. How does that work out?
- Slavoj Zizek is a well-known opponent of political correctness and has often critiqued the concept.
- He doesn't suggest anybody should go around uttering slurs for the sake of it though.
- His stance led him to agree with Jordan Peterson at their famed debate.
Warspeak has relentlessly crept into most aspects of American life and public discourse.
In a manifesto posted online shortly before he went on to massacre 22 people at an El Paso Walmart, Patrick Crusius cited the “invasion" of Texas by Hispanics. In doing so, he echoed President Trump's rhetoric of an illegal immigrant “invasion."
He goes on and on about ideology, but what does it mean?
- Žižek is often a profound thinker, but he can be difficult to understand.
- His ideas about ideology are well known, but not often understood.
- The fact that his best explanation of the idea involves a John Carpenter movie is the most Slavoj Žižek thing ever.
Here's what to say in an era where many people are too afraid to say anything.
- In a diverse world, we run the risk of accidentally saying something that will offend someone. That does not mean you should automatically be disqualified from continuing in the discussion. We cannot have a 'one strike you're out' reaction, says Allison Stanger.
- If you offend someone inadvertently, it's extremely important that you apologize and say 'That was not my intention.' Apologizing is the foundation for being able to move forward, and if the offense caused was accidental, there's no reason not to apologize.
- If you are the person who has been offended, realize that people make mistakes when they think out loud and engage in discourse. We cannot stamp out implicit biases but people can grow self-aware and learn from their mistakes. Try to be more generous to people who accidentally offend you.
It shows Europe divided into two bafflingly unfamiliar blocs - what do red and blue stand for?
- Europe divided into two blocs? That's not unheard of in history.
- However, this map of Red vs. Blue countries is indecipherable without its legend.
- That key is both trivial and unexpected. Can you guess what it is?
Red vs. Blue
Image: Vivid Maps
What do Iceland and Greece share that distinguishes them from what France and Poland have in common?
What does this map show? Don't skip ahead. See if you can guess what it's about. We'd be pretty amazed if you could.
It shows Europe divided into two blocs. That's not unheard of in history. It's just that these two are bafflingly unfamiliar. It's not the EU versus the rest, nor NATO versus the Warsaw Pact. Not Triple Alliance vs. Triple Entente. Neither Napoleonic France and its satellites versus Britain and its allies. Rome vs. barbarians? Nope.
Let's have a look at who's actually in these two blocs.
- In red: a contiguous slice of Europe, from up in Norway all the way down to Greece, anchored on Germany – the only one of Europe's Big Five (1) in the club. However, the red zone also includes outliers such as Iceland and Ireland.
- In blue: everybody else, in two zones separated by the red one. In the south and west, we find the other four members of the Big Five, and some smaller countries. In the east and north, there's Russia, Turkey and places in between and nearby, including Poland and Ukraine.
These colours denote a difference that is intriguing because you probably never even realised it existed. After this, you won't be able to ever un-see it.
Image: Vivid Maps
You may have never noticed, but you can't un-know it now: red means 'furthest first', blue means 'longest last'.
- In Red Europe, road signs show city distances from furthest on top to nearest at the bottom. As the example provided shows, if you're driving north on the E4 in southern Sweden, distant Stockholm (557 km away) is listed first, nearby Åstorp, just 13 km down the road, last.
- In Blue Europe, it's the other way around: nearest cities on top, furthest ones at the bottom of the sign. On the E40 in Poland, nearby Kraków (58 km) comes before Jędrzychowice, far away on the German border, 465 km to the west.
Latin vs. Greek
Image: Strange Maps
Some involve mysterious lines on the map that divide the world into two wholly unexpected halves. Take for instance the Jireček Line, which divides the Balkan peninsula into areas of Roman and Greek influence, based on archeological finds (see #128).
Football vs. rugby
Image: Wikimedia Commons
Or the Barassi Line, which cuts across the east of Australia from the Northern Territories to New South Wales, demarcating the part of the country, west and south of the line, where Australian-rules football is more popular, from the part to the line's east and north, where rugby (league or union) sets more hearts racing.
The Hajnal Line
Image: Demography Resources
And then there's the Hajnal Line, roughly from St Petersburg to Trieste, that divides Europe into two distinct zones of 'nuptuality': west of the line, marriage rates and fertility are comparatively low, even before the 20th century; to the east, both are (or were) comparatively high. Prior to relatively modern times, the late marriage pattern in Western Europe was fairly unique in the world.
The Siktir League
Here's a map that fortuitously flashed up the screen a few days ago, showing a weird coalition of countries, from the western Balkans all the way to the borders of China.
Alexander the Great's empire? Not quite. It's a map of countries where the swear word 'siktir' ('get lost' or 'f*ck off') appears in the native language. Considering that these languages include members of the Romance, Slavic, Turkic families, that's quite a feat (2).
Do you have any other examples of lines, colours and coalitions on maps that show the world in a different light? Let me know at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Strange Maps #981
(1) The EU may consist of 28 (soon 27) members, but just five countries constitute around 80% of the bloc's population and GDP: Germany, France, the UK, Spain and Italy.
(2) Croatia may be one country too many included on this map: speakers of that language report never using or hearing the word.