The ability to interact peacefully and voluntarily provides individuals a better quality of life.
- In classical liberal philosophy, voluntary action says the scope of legitimate government authority is extremely narrow.
- While not all classical liberals agree on immigration policy, the question remains: What right does a government have to stop someone from moving to another country should they so choose?
- As an immigrant, himself, Georgetown University professor Peter Jaworski invites us to consider the freest countries in the world and examine the economic freedom and civil liberties their citizens enjoy.
Sometimes, the more understated you are, the more positively you'll be received.
- Knowing how to enter can make or break you, according to business psychologist and advisor Dr. Melanie Katzman.
- You don't own the room or conversation by dominating it. Instead you're better off asking permission, acting respectful, and taking the time to consider what interests the person with whom you're interacting.
- Who can you look to as an example? Somewhat surprisingly, professional clowns.
Disagreements should not equal censorship.
- Defending someone's right to speak does not mean that you have to agree with what they say. The correct response is not censorship, but more discussion.
- Physician and sociologist Nicholas Christakis argues that in politics, defending the principle of a contested election is not the same as agreeing with or endorsing a candidate. "We should defend that principle even if we don't like the outcome of the vote."
- The best way to test your ideas and beliefs is to argue them against someone with a different stance/point-of-view.
Beware of the "fallacy of excessive expertise."
- The foundation for all decision-making, according to expert risk-taker Barnaby Marsh, is acquiring adequate information.
- Context and consideration of the possible outcomes is important because each decision is different and what works in one scenario won't necessarily work in another.
- Marsh argues that the evolution of knowledge is also crucial. Failing to shift and reframe knowledge as environments change (the fallacy of excessive expertise) is the biggest mistake in decision-making.
One study says reduce red meat consumption; another says enjoy. Which should we believe?
- A recent meta-analysis found red and processed meats increased the risk of developing heart disease by 3–7 percent.
- The study comes just months after an infamous review claimed Americans did not need to change their meat-eating ways.
- The problem is not scientific consensus, but how specialists analyze risk when proffering public guidelines.