To Each Nation Its Glory - Rearranging World University Rankings
TOKYO - One of the most controversial of all world rankings is the annual ‘World University Rankings of the Times Higher Education’ –some say a rather biased and telling indictment of US-Anglo-Saxon world supremacy and its alleged intellectual and cultural superiority (they claim they suck in the globe’s best and brightest).
Instead of having all countries attend as they do in any other global event such as the FIFA World Soccer Cup, the Olympic Games, the US and its ally Great Britain simply bake the winner’s cake and eat it, while the rest of the world gets nomnoming on kummelweck.
Imagine we organized a Miss World contest with 7 out of the top 10 winners to be American. Everyone else would call this out to be racist joke, a rigged travesty, and rightly feel offended. So why does humanity even consider letting the US (and its ally Britain) stage a dubious ranking in which they occupy 17 of the top 20 slots? Any nation with any self-respect should boycott this. Instead, we should work out a ranking system that dignifies and celebrates all nations and cultures –not devalues them.
We want to rank you!
Fair and inspiring world universities rankings are entirely possible, but they may not be in US interest. Take 'culture' for example: If one were to study anything related to Germany, France, or India, say, then obviously the best schools will always be German, French, or Indian ones, no? Did you know that before the US hegemony was felt on the planet, Germany lacked any concept of ‘elite universities’? All universities in Germany were equals. Berlin had to invent a so-called excellent initiative (from 2007 onward) because the Anglo-Saxon world order coerced all nations into total Americanization, including nominating its own group of ivory towers. After having steamrolled global education, abbreviated as 'Westernization', naturally it would result in the leadership of Western schools. Now, that's a marketable New World Order. But how much of it is based in the reality of cultural diversity, multitude, and pluralism?
Nations suffer from inferior complexes
Indians and Chinese, too, are obsessed with ‘World University Rankings’ and, it needs to be said, suffer from the same inferior complex the French, Italians, Spain, Russian, and Polish now do in that their countries have been totally marginalized and humiliated by American culture.
South American or African schools don’t even seem to exist in education; letting alone Iranian or Middle Eastern ones. The US –with its military conquest of the planet and cultural imperialism- has extinguished their lights; and while other empires may have ruled no different, the US at least should have known better.
Each country is unique
Just take Europe as an example: Whether it is European history, art, culture, literature, or the languages –no US University should be good enough for any of this –at least if you believe in authenticity, intensity, and embrace life as the accumulation of personal experiences.
RELATED Dreams of De-Westernization
The same holds true for Americans searching knowledge about Asia. According to the World University Rankings, they would be better off staying home. The West is best even for Asia -that seems the message to all students, researchers, and professors in the world. It's decisively fascist.
Now imagine that every nation could just send one contestant, or one contingent of contestants, and that economic power was the greatest measurement of a country’s vigilance, status, and its citizens’ intelligence and capability. Then, Britain would fall out of the top three, and we would get something like this [VIDEO] (stand 2010-2014):
The NEW Top 3 Universities in the World
[Transcript] This video will discuss the ‘Top 3 Universities in the World’. The list is objective. It is based on economic strength, the national GDP of their host nations, and the fact that all three countries in this list for various reasons worship the concept of ‘elite’ and strongly support the ideas of educational hierarchy and university rankings at home.
The Top 3 Universities in the world are:
#3 The University of Tokyo, also known as ‘Todai’. Todai lies in the heart of the world’s largest city –Tokyo. Japan has the third largest economy in the world. The country also has one of the world’s most intelligent populations, averaging an IQ of 107.
#2 Peking University, also known as ‘Beida’. Beida lies in the northwestern district of Beijing, the capital of the second largest economy in the world. It is the crown jewel of the world’s next superpower. China also has the most competitive higher education system, a high national IQ, a Confucian love for learning, and a population of 1,388,000,000 people.
#1 Harvard University in Cambridge, Boston (MA), is a private institution for the elites of the United States of America. The USA is the largest economy in the world and today’s superpower. Harvard attracts powerful and influential decision makers from all over the world –or better: their sons and daughters.
All three universities are recognized as the top institutions in their respective country. And the three countries are the #1, #2, and #3 economies in the world. Prestige and social status comes naturally to those individuals who receive degrees from either one. Based on the criteria mentioned they are currently recognized as the top three leading universities of all time... Or, are they not?
Tell us what you think and subscribe to us. You are listening to WeToldYouSo1.
Uploaded on Nov 5, 2010 WeToldYouSo1 – Mya Told (feat. The East-West Dichotomy)
Image credit: Leungchopan/Shutterstock.com
University image credits: east-west-dichotomy.com
Researchers have just discovered the remains of a hybrid human.
90,000 years ago, a young girl lived in a cave in the Altai mountains in southern Siberia. Her life was short; she died in her early teens, but she stands at a unique point in human evolution. She is the first known hybrid of two different kinds of ancient humans: the Neanderthals and the Denisovans.
These thought leaders, founders, and entrepreneurs are propelling the kind of future we want to be a part of.
- The tech industry may be dominated by men in terms of numbers, but there are lots of brilliant women in leadership positions that are changing the landscape.
- The women on this list are founders of companies dedicated to teaching girls to code, innovators in the fields of AI, VR, and machine learning, leading tech writers and podcasters, and CEOs of companies like YouTube and Project Include.
- This list is by no means all-encompassing. There are many more influential women in tech that you should seek out and follow.
Most said they want to act on their desire someday. But do open relationships actually work?
- The study involved 822 Americans who were in monogamous relationships at the time.
- Participants answered questions about their personalities, sexual fantasies, and intentions to act on those fantasies.
- Research suggests practicing consent, comfort, and communication makes open relationships more likely to succeed.
Consensual non-monogamy fantasies<p>For the new study, published in <a href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10508-020-01788-7" target="_blank">Archives of Sexual Behavior</a>, researchers asked 822 people in monogamous relationships to:</p><ul><li>Describe their favorite sexual fantasy, defined as "mental images you have while you are awake that you find to be sexually arousing or erotic."</li><li>Select which themes apply to that fantasy, such as having sex with multiple people at the same time, experimenting with taboos, or engaging in a sexually open relationship.</li><li>Answer whether they intended to carry out these fantasies, and discuss them with their partner.</li><li>Complete assessments on relationship satisfaction, erotophilia and personality, as measured by the Big Five Personality inventory.</li></ul><p>The results showed that 32.6 percent of participants said being part of a sexually open relationship was "part of their favorite sexual fantasy of all time." More surprising is that, of that one-third, 80 percent said they want to act on this fantasy in the future.</p>
Pretzelpaws via Wikipedia Commons<p style="margin-left: 20px;">"The present research confirms the important distinction between sexual fantasy and sexual desire in that not everyone wanted to act on their favorite sexual fantasy of all time," study author Justin J. Lehmiller told <a href="https://www.psypost.org/2020/09/one-third-of-people-in-monogamous-relationships-fantasize-about-being-in-some-type-of-open-relationship-study-suggests-58102" target="_blank">PsyPost</a>. "This suggests that fantasies may serve different functions for different people."</p><p>Even though most participants said they want to act out their fantasy in the future, far fewer reported acting out sexual fantasies in the past. Other findings included:</p><ul><li>Men were more likely to fantasize about CNMRs.</li><li>So were people who scored high in <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erotophilia#:~:text=Erotophilia%20is%20a%20personality%20trait,ranging%20from%20erotophobia%20to%20erotophilia." target="_blank">erotophilia</a> and sociosexual orientation.</li><li>The psychological predictors of fantasizing about CNMRs differed from predictors about infidelity fantasies.</li></ul>
Do open relationships work?<p>A <a href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00224499.2019.1669133" target="_blank">2019 study</a> from psychologists at the University of Rochester suggests it <em>is </em>possible<em>, </em>but especially when both partners practice a trio of behaviors: consent, communication, and comfort — or, the Triple-C Model.<br></p>But the study also suggests not all forms of open relationships are equally viable. For example, people in one-sided CNMRs — where one partner stays monogamous, the other seeks outside sexual relationships — were nearly three times more dissatisfied in their relationships than the monogamous group <em>and </em>the consensual non-monogamous group.
The results of this study showed depressive symptoms being highest in adolescence, declining in early adulthood and then climbing back up again into one's early 30s.