Why Narcissists Become President, with Jeffrey Kluger

Kluger discusses why narcissists excel in politics and rates the narcissism of those who have called the White House home.

Why Narcissists Become President, with Jeffrey Kluger

TIME Senior Writer Jeffrey Kluger is the author of nine books, including his latest, The Narcissist Next Door. In his Big Think interview below, Kluger discusses why narcissists excel in politics and rates the narcissism of those who have called the White House home.


Kluger begins by listing the three behavioral traits commonly associated with narcissism.

First, there's grandiosity: "a deeply felt belief that you are better than other people, that you're more skilled than other people, more gifted than other people." Those who are grandiose believe that they offer much to a world incapable of receiving their gifts and knowledge. As we're soon to delve into the topic of narcissism and politics, you can definitely see how grandiosity would feel at home in Washington.

Next, there's entitlement. We already have a pretty good understanding of what that word means, though Kluger employs an effective example to convey his exact definition:

"Babies have that level of entitlement. It's the reason that babies aren't just frustrated or disappointed when they're denied the cookie or the extra ice cream there want, they're actually outraged by it because they can't believe in their wee baby brains that they're actually being denied something they want. It's the difference between want and need and narcissists don't get it."

Kluger points to the third element of narcissism -- lack of empathy -- as its most critical and self-destructive. He describes narcissists as being "anesthetized" to how their actions affect other people. Most of us are aware when what we're doing causes harm. This in turn causes us to cease those actions. Narcissists lack that innate skill and therefore lack behavioral deterrents. 

As with most personality disorders, narcissism exists on a scale. Kluger explains that there's a big difference in intensity between "lowercase n" narcissism and 'capital N" Narcissism. The latter is clinically described as narcissistic personality disorder (NPD). Only about 3% of the population has NPD, which is consistent with other similar disorders. Existing near the "capital N" side of the continuum means a lot of self-destructive and confrontational behavior. But if you slide down toward the other end of the scale, Kluger explains that there are times when "lower case n" narcissism can be a good thing. It serves as a way to express thoughts and creativity:

"Even our greatest and most humble people, Mahatma Gandhi, Martin Luther King, had to have had narcissistic components to their personality. They gravitated toward attention, they gravitated toward crowds. If we believe that they didn't get a charge out of standing before a crowd of half a million people, or in the case of Gandhi millions, and moving an entire nation with their words, well we don't really understand human nature then if that's what we think of."

Kluger then begins to examine the personalities of various past presidents. Bill Clinton, he says, was a self-destructive narcissist propped up by his charm and charisma. He calls Ronald Reagan "the most highly functioning narcissist who's ever been in our political system."

"Even if you don't like Reagan's politics, even if you never voted for him you had to acknowledge the fact that he seemed just like a decent and genial and comfortable and amused and amusing man who enjoyed being inside his own skin, who enjoyed being around other people, who just liked what he was doing in a very uncomplicated way. But again, it was narcissism, healthy narcissism that pushed him into movies, it was healthy narcissism that pushed him into politics."

Kluger's most narcissistic president is Chester A. Arthur, who served an unspectacular term as commander-in-chief in the early 1880s. Arthur's narcissism manifested itself in vanity. He refurbished the White House with items bought under the supervision of Louis Tiffany and owned 80 different pairs of pants that he made to sure to flaunt with gusto. Kluger cites Franklin Delano Roosevelt and Lyndon B. Johnson as other high-scoring narcissists. Their respective relentlessness in pursuing power and pushing the Vietnam War reflect keen elements of grandiosity and entitlement.

On the other hand, Kluger calls Calvin Coolidge the least narcissistic of all American presidents:

"[Coolidge] once famously said 'I think Americans want a solemn ass as president and I'm going to give them that.' So he succeeded in that."

As for the man currently in residence at 1600 Pennsylvania Northwest, Kluger guesses that Barrack Obama would score high on the Narcissistic Personality Inventory. Yet, at the same time, the current president's aloofness and discomfort when mingling set him apart from many other narcissists. In this way, he's much more like Richard Nixon than Reagan or Clinton.

Kluger concludes with an anecdote involving a conversation he had with Al Gore around 2008. Within this anecdote, Kluger places his finger on the pulse of why narcissists do so well in politics:

"I asked [Gore] 'do you believe that if you came to the conclusion that you were truly the best person equipped to effectuate the kinds of changes that you want to see the country effectuate, particularly say environmental issues, do you believe that you would then have almost a personal obligation to run?' And he answered with sort of a laugh and said, 'Well, everybody who runs for president believes that.'

To run for president and endure a grueling, often ugly campaign, one has to possess the staunch and unwavering belief that he or she is the best qualified person for the job. It's what keeps presidential candidates going. It's what motivates and drives them. All it takes is a foundation of grandiosity, a keen sense of entitlement, and perhaps a little lack of empathy and awareness.

If you've got those traits under your belt, you may have a future in politics.

Did early humans hibernate?

New anthropological research suggests our ancestors enjoyed long slumbers.

Credit: Gorodenkoff / Adobe Stock
Surprising Science
  • Neanderthal bone fragments discovered in northern Spain mimic hibernating animals like cave bears.
  • Thousands of bone fragments, dating back 400,000 years, were discovered in this "pit of bones" 30 years ago.
  • The researchers speculate that this physiological function, if true, could prepare us for extended space travel.
Keep reading Show less

Does science tell the truth?

It is impossible for science to arrive at ultimate truths, but functional truths are good enough.

Credit: Sergey Nivens / 202871840
13-8
  • What is truth? This is a very tricky question, trickier than many would like to admit.
  • Science does arrive at what we can call functional truth, that is, when it focuses on what something does as opposed to what something is. We know how gravity operates, but not what gravity is, a notion that has changed over time and will probably change again.
  • The conclusion is that there are not absolute final truths, only functional truths that are agreed upon by consensus. The essential difference is that scientific truths are agreed upon by factual evidence, while most other truths are based on belief.
Keep reading Show less

A canvas of nonsense: how Dada reflects a world gone mad through art

Using urinals, psychological collages, and animated furniture to shock us into reality.

A Dadaist artist is painted with the ashes of burned banknotes during the financial crisis.

Credit: MICHELE LIMINA via Getty Images
Culture & Religion
  • Dada is a provocative and surreal art movement born out of the madness of World War I.
  • Tzara, a key Dada theorist, says Dada seeks "to confuse and upset, to shake and jolt" people from their comfort zones.
  • Dada, as all avant-garde art, faces a key problem in how to stay true to its philosophy.
Keep reading Show less
Surprising Science

Study: Tripping might not be required for psychedelic therapy

Two different studies provide further evidence of the efficacy of psychedelics in treating depression.

Quantcast