Sierra Leone is the world’s roundest country (and Egypt the squarest one)
Mind-boggling as it is, some of the world's roundest countries are also some of the most rectangular ones.
Take look at a map of Turkey and you'll have to agree: it’s a curiously box-shaped country. Why is the wrong question. Like most international borders, Turkey's are the result of geopolitical accident, not of aesthetic or geometric design. A more pertinent query: How rectangular is Turkey? Is it, perhaps, the most rectangular country in the world?
To answer that question, you'd have to find a dataset that minutely describes the borders of all countries on Earth and devise an algorithm that compares each country's shape to an optimum rectangle with the same area.
That's exactly what Australian geo-statistician David Barry did. His conclusion: Turkey is only the 15th most rectangular country in the world. The winner: Egypt.
Inevitably, one esoteric geographical question led to its opposite: What is the roundest country in the world? That one was answered by Gonzalo Ciruelos, an Argentinian mathematician. The top of that ranking is Sierra Leone.
As the winners in both categories indicate, Africa is a country of great diversity in geopolitical morphology. But the most curious country in either ranking is... the Vatican. As it turns out, the Papal State is both the 4th roundest and the 2nd most rectangular country in the world. How is that possible?
First, let's have a closer look at the results. In Mr Barry's definition, 'optimum rectangularity' is the maximum percentage overlap of a country with a rectangle of the same area.
He's the first to admit that his algorithm may be inadequate for some countries with complex shapes ("Italy looks like the biggest country that might be wrong"), scattered geographies (e.g. Norway, because it includes Bouvet Island, a Norwegian dependency located between South Africa and Antarctica, freakishly far from the motherland) or locations on either side of the 180° longitude meridian (New Zealand, United States, Russia).
Also, the Natural Earth database includes small dependencies such as Scarborough Reef (1) as separate entries, which somewhat distorts a per-country ranking. Still, here goes:
Cutting through empty deserts, Egypt’s eastern and southern borders are completely straight—the Bir Tawil Trapezoid (2) is a notable but statistically insignificant exception. Combined with a fairly straight Mediterranean coastline in the north and its only slightly slanted Red Sea shore in the east, Egypt gets a ‘rectangularity’ score of 0.955 (out of 1), and the first place.
The Vatican’s actual borders are a lot more varied than this boxy rendition—perhaps because the database wasn’t built to reflect the delineation of the world’s smallest state in the greatest possible detail. That may explain why the geopolitical headquarters of the Catholic church manages to rank second in this list.
Smallness and concurrent lack of detail may explain the high score of Sint-Maarten, one of the Dutch dependencies in the Caribbean, but not of Lesotho—a much bigger enclave state inside South Africa—nor Yemen. Currently torn by a vicious civil war, the latter country may yet dissolve back into North and South Yemen, as was the case until 1990. Its constituent parts would likely tumble far down the global rectangularity rankings, perhaps the most trivial effect of such a separation.
Still rating higher than 0.9 on the rectangularity scale are Ghana and Ivory Coast in Africa, and in Europe Macedonia and Poland—indeed also one of those preternaturally 'boxy'-looking countries. The tiny Pacific island nation of Nauru, for its part, is another one of those countries that looks rectangular by lack of detail in the database.
Sudan lost its southern third (3) in an independence referendum in 2011. As the emptiest of consolations, it gained in rectangularity. It now ranks 11th in the world. Rating 0.916, Eswatini (since 19 April 2018 the new name for Swaziland) loses out by a small margin from its near neighbor Lesotho. Uruguay is the highest Latin American entry.
Both the U.K. and the U.S. are down towards the bottom of the ranking, by the way. The United Kingdom (rating 0.763) is down in 159th place. Largely due to the eccentricity of Alaska (and Hawaii), the United States (rating 0.735) is only the 169th most rectangular country in the world.
Taking a look at the other ranking, Sierra Leone (rating: 0.934) leads the world in national roundness—despite also being the world’s 14th most rectangular country. It’s a nose-length ahead of Nauru (0.923), which is also the world’s 10th most rectangular country.
Zimbabwe (0.915) might have finished first, if it weren’t for the Hwange region in Matabeleland, jutting out of the country’s circle of Optimal Rotundity. The Southern African country is also the world’s 30th most rectangular country, by the way.
As mentioned earlier, the 4th-roundest country is the Vatican, the world’s 2nd most rectangular country. The 5th-roundest country: Poland… on 9th place in the other ranking.
So what does this teach us? Little of any practical value, except this: the fact that the Vatican scores pretty high on both lists has nothing to do with divine intervention. Contrary to common sense, countries can be both very rotund and very rectangular at the same time.
And funnily enough, it’s also the same countries that are both the least round and rectangular: on 208th and last place, the Maldives are the world's least rectangular country, followed by the Marshall Islands (on 207). That same Pacific archipelago is also the world's least round country, with the Maldives trailing just four places behind.
Strange Maps #926
Got a strange map? Let me know at firstname.lastname@example.org.
(1) A shoal in the South China Sea disputed between China, Taiwan and the Philippines. In April 2012, the Chinese Navy prevented their Philippine counterparts from apprehending a number of Chinese fishing vessels off Scarborough Reef (known in Chinese as Huangyan Dao). Since that incident, de facto control over the Reef has passed from the Philippines to China – straining both relations between the Philippines and China, and between the Philippines and the U.S., which did not act to defend the territorial claim of its ally.
(2) Quite possibly the only officially ungoverned territory on Earth, outside Antarctica. See also #396.
(3) South Sudan—infamous as one of the world's data holes (see #843). But not for the aforementioned researchers: the world's youngest nation is the 63rd roundest and 89th most rectangular country in the world.
Join Radiolab's Latif Nasser at 1pm ET on Monday as he chats with Malcolm Gladwell live on Big Think.
University of Utah research finds that men are especially well suited for fisticuffs.
- With males having more upper-body mass than women, a study looks to find the reason.
- The study is based on the assumption that men have been fighters for so long that evolution has selected those best-equipped for the task.
- If men fought other men, winners would have survived and reproduced, losers not so much.
Built for mayhem<img type="lazy-image" data-runner-src="https://assets.rebelmouse.io/eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.eyJpbWFnZSI6Imh0dHBzOi8vYXNzZXRzLnJibC5tcy8yMjY2NDIyMy9vcmlnaW4uanBnIiwiZXhwaXJlc19hdCI6MTYxMzk4NTQ2OX0.my6nML12F3fEQu3H4G0BScdqgaMZkRQHxgyj-Cmjmzk/img.jpg?width=980" id="906fc" class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="dd77af7a881631355ed8972437846394" data-rm-shortcode-name="rebelmouse-image" />
Image source: Ollyy/Shutterstock<p>The researchers are, of course, talking averages here, not stating a rule: There are plenty of accomplished female pugilists, as well as lots of males who have no idea how to throw a punch.</p><p>Even so, says co-author <a href="https://www.wofford.edu/academics/majors-and-programs/biology/faculty-and-staff" target="_blank">Jeremy Morris</a> says, "The general approach to understanding why sexual dimorphism evolves is to measure the actual differences in the muscles or the skeletons of males and females of a given species, and then look at the behaviors that might be driving those differences."</p><p>Carrier has been interested in the idea that millennia of male fighting has shaped certain structures in male bodies. Previous research has reinforced his hunch:</p> <ul> <li><a href="https://jeb.biologists.org/content/216/2/236" target="_blank">When a hand is formed into a fist, its structure is self-protective</a>.</li> <li><a href="https://unews.utah.edu/flat-footed-fighters/" target="_blank">Heels planted firmly on the ground augment upper-body power</a>.</li> <li><a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24909544" target="_blank">A study examined facial bone structure as being especially well-suited for taking a punch</a>.</li> </ul> <p>(That last one is our favorite. Do you know the German word "<a href="https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Backpfeifengesicht" target="_blank">backpfeifengesicht</a>?" It's an adjective describing "a face that badly needs a punching.")</p><p>"One of the predictions that comes out of those," asserts Carrier, "is if we are specialized for punching, you might expect males to be particularly strong in the muscles that are associated with throwing a punch."</p>
Testing the theory<img type="lazy-image" data-runner-src="https://assets.rebelmouse.io/eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.eyJpbWFnZSI6Imh0dHBzOi8vYXNzZXRzLnJibC5tcy8yMjY2NDIzMy9vcmlnaW4uanBnIiwiZXhwaXJlc19hdCI6MTYwNzMxMTE2MH0.UXJICMy57UPYUWskhK98alctOrPidJL9yxMkz3HDQrM/img.jpg?width=980" id="98718" class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="b12287684ac3e740b70392e6433a6b8f" data-rm-shortcode-name="rebelmouse-image" />
Image source: Ollyy/Shutterstock<p>The researchers measured the punching — and spear-throwing — force of 20 men and 19 women. The assumption was that early humans were punchers <em>and</em> spear-throwers.</p><p>Prior to testing, each participant had filled out an activity questionnaire so that "we weren't getting couch potatoes, we were getting people that were very fit and active," says Morris.</p><p>For punching, participants operated a hand crank that required movement similar to throwing a haymaker. The purpose of the hand crank was to spare participants any damage that might be inflicted on their fists by throwing actual punches. Subjects were also measured pulling a line forward over their heads to assess their strength at throwing a spear.</p><p>Even though all of the participants, male and female, were routinely fit, the average power of males was assessed as being 162% greater than females. There were no gender differences in throwing strength recorded. Other untested, though presumably likely, hand-to-hand combat activities come to mind including tackling, clubbing, running, kicking, scratching, and biting.</p><p>Carrier's takeaway: "This is a dramatic example of sexual dimorphism that's consistent with males becoming more specialized for fighting, and males fighting in a particular way, which is throwing punches."</p>
Boys will be boys<p>It, er, strikes us as odd that, even in science fiction — hi-tech weaponry notwithstanding — the hero <em>is</em> going to wind up duking it out with some bad guy, or alien, in the climactic battle. What is it about men punching, anyway? Are they more sexually attractive? The study suggests so:</p><p style="margin-left: 20px;"><em>The results of this study add to a set of recently identified characters indicating that sexual selection on male aggressive performance has played a role in the evolution of the human musculoskeletal system and the evolution of sexual dimorphism in hominins.</em></p><p>It's tough to contribute to the gene pool after being killed in battle.</p><p>Also, while the authors aren't <em>quite</em> saying that males' historical fighting role is mandated by biology and not by social expectations, neither are they quite <em>not</em> saying it.</p><p>As Carrier explain to <a href="https://attheu.utah.edu/facultystaff/carrier-punch/" target="_blank">theU</a>: "Human nature is also characterized by avoiding violence and finding ways to be cooperative and work together, to have empathy, to care for each other, right? There are two sides to who we are as a species. If our goal is to minimize all forms of violence in the future, then understanding our tendencies and what our nature really is, is going to help."</p>
Innovators don't ignore risk; they are just better able to analyze it in uncertain situations.
The Labour Economics study suggests two potential reasons for the increase: corruption and increased capacity.
Cool hand rebuke<img type="lazy-image" data-runner-src="https://assets.rebelmouse.io/eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.eyJpbWFnZSI6Imh0dHBzOi8vYXNzZXRzLnJibC5tcy8yNDQyMTIyNy9vcmlnaW4uanBnIiwiZXhwaXJlc19hdCI6MTY0NjY1NTYyOH0.0MCPKN3If94mYCNf3mMNrnTvJXjXN_bKLhgk9203EXk/img.jpg?width=917&coordinates=0%2C0%2C0%2C0&height=453" id="1627b" class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="6d76421ba1ea0de4b09956b97e80c384" data-rm-shortcode-name="rebelmouse-image" />
A chart showing prison population rates (per 100,000 people) in 2018. The United States has the highest rate of incarceration in the world.