Why President Trump (probably) can’t be criminally prosecuted

Two men formerly close to President Donald Trump are now facing prison in a development that could prove consequential for Trump’s longevity in office and the U.S. political system in general.

Two men formerly close to President Donald Trump are now facing prison in a development that could prove consequential for Trump’s longevity in office and the U.S. political system in general.

On Tuesday, Paul Manafort, Trump’s former campaign chairman, was found guilty of tax evasion and bank fraud by a jury in Virginia. Just minutes later, in New York, Michael Cohen, a former lawyer for Trump, pleaded guilty to campaign finance violations, tax evasion and other charges.

The most damning development for the president on Tuesday came when Cohen effectively told the court he worked “in coordination” with Trump to make hush-money payments to Stormy Daniels and Karen McDougal during the 2016 presidential campaign. What’s more, Cohen said he made one of these payments “in coordination with, and at the direction of a candidate for federal office,” which is almost certainly a reference to Trump.

“The words ‘coördination with’ and ‘at the direction of’ will haunt the Trump Presidency,” The New Yorker’s Jeffrey Toobin said after the hearing. “Cohen directly implicated Trump as a co-conspirator in a felony.” Strikingly, Cohen, a man who once said he’d take a bullet for Trump, wasn’t required to implicate the president in order to plead guilty.

Michael Cohen leaves Federal Court after his hearing at the United States District Court Southern District of New York. (Photo by Yana Paskova/Getty Images)

Trump might now be an “unindicted co-conspirator” in federal crimes, but it’s still unclear whether—or when—he’ll be prosecuted.

The Justice Department has long held the legal view that a sitting U.S. president is immune from routine criminal prosecution, which “would unconstitutionally undermine the capacity of the executive branch to perform its constitutionally assigned functions.” Special counsel Robert Mueller has said he’d honor this policy.

There’s also a problem concerning the hierarchy of executive power: As the leader of the executive branch, the president could simply fire any U.S. attorney or independent counsel who chooses to pursue him.

“If they did seek an indictment against the president, the president would almost certainly appeal right away,” Brian Kalt, a law professor at Michigan State University, told Vox in 2017. “Immunity arguments get reviewed right away, since the point of immunity is that you can’t be prosecuted—letting the trial go forward would moot the issue. It would go all the way up to the Supreme Court in short order, but that could delay things for a few months at least.”

In other words, there’s a chance the Supreme Court could, for the first time, rule on the constitutionality of bringing criminal charges against a sitting U.S. president. But what’s also possible, and perhaps more likely, is that Congress will decide what consequences—if any—the president should face after the recent revelations.

Congress could move to impeach the president, but that’s unlikely to occur as long as Republicans remain in power.

“I’m assuming he’s not going to be indicted because he’s a sitting president,” Sol Wisenberg, who conducted grand jury questioning of President Bill Clinton during the Whitewater investigation, told the Chicago Tribune. “But it leads him closer to ultimate impeachment proceedings, particularly if the Democrats take back the House.”

If Trump is impeached, or if he resigns from office like former President Richard Nixon did in 1974, he could immediately become subject to routine criminal prosecution.

Congress also has another option: It could revive the independent counsel statute, passed after Watergate, that allows for the appointment of a special prosecutor who could bring charges against the president, and who, unlike other federal prosecutors, could only be fired by executive leaders “for cause.”

Still, some argue the president would still be within his rights to fire such a special prosecutor. It’s also unlikely Congress is willing to revive the statute at this point in time.

In any case, Tuesday’s revelations are bound to have political consequences, if not legal ones, for Trump and his allies.

“You now have the president effectively being an unindicted co-conspirator in a crime, and it seems highly likely that that then becomes a serious political, if not a direct legal threat to the president,” Joseph Kahn, managing editor of The New York Times, told The Daily podcast. “So this is a historic shift in the nature of the threat that we’ve been hearing about, writing about, talking about for so many months.”

NASA astronomer Michelle Thaller on ​the multiple dimensions of space and human sexuality

Science and the squishiness of the human mind. The joys of wearing whatever the hell you want, and so much more.

Think Again Podcasts
  • Why can't we have a human-sized cat tree?
  • What would happen if you got a spoonful of a neutron star?
  • Why do we insist on dividing our wonderfully complex selves into boring little boxes
Keep reading Show less

How to split the USA into two countries: Red and Blue

Progressive America would be half as big, but twice as populated as its conservative twin.

Image: Dicken Schrader
Strange Maps
  • America's two political tribes have consolidated into 'red' and 'blue' nations, with seemingly irreconcilable differences.
  • Perhaps the best way to stop the infighting is to go for a divorce and give the two nations a country each
  • Based on the UN's partition plan for Israel/Palestine, this proposal provides territorial contiguity and sea access to both 'red' and 'blue' America
Keep reading Show less

Ideology drives us apart. Neuroscience can bring us back together.

A guide to making difficult conversations possible—and peaceful—in an increasingly polarized nation.

  • How can we reach out to people on the other side of the divide? Get to know the other person as a human being before you get to know them as a set of tribal political beliefs, says Sarah Ruger. Don't launch straight into the difficult topics—connect on a more basic level first.
  • To bond, use icebreakers backed by neuroscience and psychology: Share a meal, watch some comedy, see awe-inspiring art, go on a tough hike together—sharing tribulation helps break down some of the mental barriers we have between us. Then, get down to talking, putting your humanity before your ideology.
  • The Charles Koch Foundation is committed to understanding what drives intolerance and the best ways to cure it. The foundation supports interdisciplinary research to overcome intolerance, new models for peaceful interactions, and experiments that can heal fractured communities. For more information, visit charleskochfoundation.org/courageous-collaborations.