Dogs Are Better at Reading Emotions than We Thought
New research demonstrates for the first time the domestic canine's ability to discern between positive and negative emotions in humans.
Early dogs quickly evolved the ability to use visual and auditory cues to discern the emotional states of other dogs. Such an ability understandably contributes to survival efforts; this is something we see throughout the animal kingdom. But now that the typical canine is of the domestic variety, has this discerning ability been adapted to include the emotional states of human companions?
The answer is yes, according to a new study published in Biology Letters, and it's the first demonstrative evidence of such an ability from non-primates.
In layman's terms: Your crazy aunt who believes her cocker spaniel "just gets her" is possibly correct, though still probably crazy. The researchers make sure to note their results only demonstrate a dog's ability to differentiate between emotions, not necessarily to process them.
The experiment at the heart of the study tested 17 canines' abilities to form associations using photos of emotive human faces and recordings of impassioned voices. The subject dogs' performances were then weighed against their abilities to do the same with photos/recordings of other dogs. While the results demonstrated a keener ability to discriminate between positive and negative emotions in other dogs, the researchers were satisfied with the subjects' performances in associating human vocal patterns and facial expressions with emotional states.
The final takeaway here is that dogs are more discerning than the scientific community had previously been able to prove, and that your English Bulldog Grover really does know when he's been a bad, bad doggie.
Image credit: woottigon / Shutterstock
Source: Science Mag
Robert Montenegro is a writer and dramaturg who regularly contributes to Big Think and Crooked Scoreboard. He lives in Washington DC and is a graduate of Loyola Marymount University in Los Angeles.
Swipe right to make the connections that could change your career.
Swipe right. Match. Meet over coffee or set up a call.
No, we aren't talking about Tinder. Introducing Shapr, a free app that helps people with synergistic professional goals and skill sets easily meet and collaborate.
The Oxfam report prompted Anand Giridharadas to tweet: "Don't be Pinkered into everything's-getting-better complacency."
- A new report by Oxfam argues that wealth inequality is causing poverty and misery around the world.
- In the last year, the world's billionaires saw their wealth increase by 12%, while the poorest 3.8 billion people on the planet lost 11% of their wealth.
- The report prompted Anand Giridharadas to tweet: "Don't be Pinkered into everything's-getting-better complacency." We explain what Steven Pinker's got to do with it.
Moans, groans, and gripes release stress hormones in the brain.
Could you give up complaining for a whole month? That's the crux of this interesting piece by Jessica Hullinger over at Fast Company. Hullinger explores the reasons why humans are so predisposed to griping and why, despite these predispositions, we should all try to complain less. As for no complaining for a month, that was the goal for people enrolled in the Complaint Restraint project.
Participants sought to go the entirety of February without so much as a moan, groan, or bellyache.
- Facebook and Google began as companies with supposedly noble purposes.
- Creating a more connected world and indexing the world's information: what could be better than that?
- But pressure to return value to shareholders came at the expense of their own users.
SMARTER FASTER trademarks owned by The Big Think, Inc. All rights reserved.