Here's Proof that Better Science Results in More Justice

A recent Supreme Court ruling declared that unintentional bias is not only real but harmful. That ruling not only validates the work of cognitive scientists, but paves the way for change. 

Here's Proof that Better Science Results in More Justice


We’ve written before about how prejudice is informed by cognitive bias. It’s a real but  unintentional action with negative consequences. And now, thanks to a recent Supreme Court case, it might also be legally indefensible.

The 2015 decision for Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. Inclusive Communities Project, Inc. weighed challenges to the Fair Housing Act of 1968, which forbids “disparate impact” discrimination -- actions or practices that appear neutral on the surface but are racist in practice (i.e., real estate agents more easily sharing pricing information with white buyers instead of black ones). The court held that “the impact a policy produces is sufficient to merit remedy… because unconscious prejudice and disguised animus can mask discrimination.” That means that the law “permits plaintiffs to counteract unconscious prejudices and disguised animus that escape easy classification as disparate treatment.” This is the closest recognition the legal community has offered that not all racism is as overt or intentional as disparate treatment, but just as harmful.

This decision is landmark for two major reasons, as cited by a team of Harvard cognitive scientists in a paper for ScienceDirect:

First, for most of the Court’s recent history, in the area of civil rights, the idea that assessment of harm hinges on clear and demonstrable intent has been held with dogged persistence. [this decision] is important because it reverses that direction. Second, in [this decision], Justice Kennedy, writing for the majority, made explicit reference to a particular psychological state of mind stating that disparate impact is sufficient basis for a challenge because ‘unconscious prejudice and disguised animus’ can mask discrimination.

Why are those two things so important? Because research has shown time and again that disguised animus starts early and has major ramifications - disparate or otherwise - that need to be addressed. This study, along with a 2012 review published in Nature Neuroscience, offer a solid recap of all the ways that bias is nurtured. According to that latter study:

For almost a century, psychologists studied the feelings and beliefs that white Americans have about black Americans, and the data demonstrate a consistent and marked drop in negative attitudes and stereotypes. However, for the past three decades, dissatisfaction with survey-type measures of explicitly reported race attitudes and stereotypes grew. This led investigators to develop indirect measures of social cognition. Among the more widely used measures of implicit social cognition is the Implicit Association Test (IAT), which measures the strength of association between concepts, such as white and black, and attributes, such as good and bad.

Using that new rubric, here are some of the more striking findings of the past few years:

  • White and black children ages 5-10 responded with a high rate of "white bias," identifying light skin color with positive attributes and darker skin with negative attributes

  • Young children seeing faces of five-year-old black boys appears to trigger thoughts of guns and violence

  • Anti-Hispanic IAT bias predicted attitudes toward illegal and legal immigration

  • ER and resident physicians with stronger anti-black IAT bias were less likely to prescribe a particular medical procedure to black patients

  • Stronger anti-Black IAT bias among physicians led to more negative experiences with Black patients

  • Anti-Black IAT biased influenced (correctable) bias in trial judges

    IB Table.jpg

    Credit: Science Direct

    “None of these results would be as surprising if the measures of attitudes and stereotypes were obtained via self-report,” writes lead author Mahzarin Banaji in the 2015 study. Because they were not and still had ramifications (“disparate impact”), these biases have a real societal cost. With this understanding of bias, it’s refreshing to see it cited in a court case. Given that the case is incredibly high profile and setting legal precedent, it’s exciting to use this as legal precedent and find ways to use laws and public policies to address harm caused by it.

    ‘Designer baby’ book trilogy explores the moral dilemmas humans may soon create

    How would the ability to genetically customize children change society? Sci-fi author Eugene Clark explores the future on our horizon in Volume I of the "Genetic Pressure" series.

    Surprising Science
    • A new sci-fi book series called "Genetic Pressure" explores the scientific and moral implications of a world with a burgeoning designer baby industry.
    • It's currently illegal to implant genetically edited human embryos in most nations, but designer babies may someday become widespread.
    • While gene-editing technology could help humans eliminate genetic diseases, some in the scientific community fear it may also usher in a new era of eugenics.
    Keep reading Show less

    Octopus-like creatures inhabit Jupiter’s moon, claims space scientist

    A leading British space scientist thinks there is life under the ice sheets of Europa.

    Jupiter's moon Europa has a huge ocean beneath its sheets of ice.

    Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/SETI Institute
    Surprising Science
    • A British scientist named Professor Monica Grady recently came out in support of extraterrestrial life on Europa.
    • Europa, the sixth largest moon in the solar system, may have favorable conditions for life under its miles of ice.
    • The moon is one of Jupiter's 79.
    Keep reading Show less

    Lair of giant predator worms from 20 million years ago found

    Scientists discover burrows of giant predator worms that lived on the seafloor 20 million years ago.

    Bobbit worm (Eunice aphroditois).

    Credit: Jenny – Flickr
    Surprising Science
    • Scientists in Taiwan find the lair of giant predator worms that inhabited the seafloor 20 million years ago.
    • The worm is possibly related to the modern bobbit worm (Eunice aphroditois).
    • The creatures can reach several meters in length and famously ambush their pray.
    Keep reading Show less

    FOSTA-SESTA: Have controversial sex trafficking acts done more harm than good?

    The idea behind the law was simple: make it more difficult for online sex traffickers to find victims.

    Has FOSTA-SESTA really lived up to it's promise of protecting sex trafficking victims - or has it made them easier to target?

    Credit: troyanphoto on Adobe Stock
    Politics & Current Affairs
    • SESTA (Stop Enabling Sex Traffickers Act) and FOSTA (Allow States and Victims to Fight Online Sex Trafficking Act) started as two separate bills that were both created with a singular goal: curb online sex trafficking. They were signed into law by former President Trump in 2018.
    • The implementation of this law in America has left an international impact, as websites attempt to protect themselves from liability by closing down the sections of their sites that sex workers use to arrange safe meetings with clientele.
    • While supporters of this bill have framed FOSTA-SESTA as a vital tool that could prevent sex trafficking and allow sex trafficking survivors to sue those websites for facilitating their victimization, many other people are strictly against the bill and hope it will be reversed.
    Keep reading Show less
    Videos

    What is the ‘self’? The 3 layers of your identity.

    Answering the question of who you are is not an easy task. Let's unpack what culture, philosophy, and neuroscience have to say.

    Scroll down to load more…
    Quantcast