This Is Why I Love Watching John Oliver’s Take Downs
Late night comedians are taking on The Man like it’s their job.
If you’ve been hanging out around the middle school lunchroom that is the blogosphere, you may have noticed a fight is brewing, and late night hosts are mad. In fact, some of them are outraged. At least, that’s what I’ve been reading. Jon Stewart was always obliterating Fox News in his heyday and there is even a top five list of his most epic takedowns. Now John Oliver is furious about mental health, blistering televangelists, and dropping the mic after long rants. Stephen Colbert has joined the rumble with some takedowns, too. Why are media outlets using this language to describe comedians, and what exactly is the role of the political comedian in our culture anyway?
John Oliver OBLITERATES the so-called mental illness debate.
It’s possible they’re just trying to spread the message conveyed by the late night shows, and think that using a tone of excited gossip will do it. Framing comedians as troublemakers, rebels with applause, taking down The Man, is certainly an entertaining heroes-and-villains story. I think it goes beyond the headlines into something deeper: how we view comedians in our culture and the role they play for us.
Political comedians are the court jesters of the modern era. From as far back as the 15th century and well into the 17th, the court jester was the truth-telling clown calling out the monarchy. While there is some debate on exactly how much of that is romanticised and how much is factual, it is true that Queen Elizabeth and King Lear both threatened their jesters when they crossed the line. Perhaps that jester was guilty of “epic p’wnage” on Queen Liz, who may have been the Bill O’Reilly of 1558.
While for many years Stewart wore the banner of “the most trusted name in fake news,” he was also just one of the most trusted names. News or fake news: It didn’t matter. People looked to Stewart the way they now look to Oliver and Colbert. We want our comedians to tell us the truth about ourselves, about our politics, about our world like the jesters did hundreds of years ago.
They can call out the bully because they yield the magic sword of humor, which cuts through delusion and propaganda with its sharp edge, made of wit. They don’t always get it right — no one does — but if a comedian has shifted my perspective or brought my worldview into greater focus then they have done their job. Often they also speak for those of us who don’t have a platform, acting as a voice for those who don’t have one loud enough. We can get behind them, cheer them on and sigh in relief as the bad boy takes down the school bully. Did you see it? He totally demolished him.
Lori Chandler is a writer and comedian living in Brooklyn, NY, which is the most unoriginal sentence she has ever written. You can look at her silly drawings on Tumblr, Rad Drawings, or read her silly tweets @LilBoodleChild. Enough about her, she says: how are you?
JOHN OLIVER PHOTO CREDIT: David Livingston/Getty Images
SPACE PHOTO CREDIT: iStock
PHOTOSHOP: Lori Chandler
Antimicrobial resistance is growing worldwide, rendering many "work horse" medicines ineffective. Without intervention, drug-resistant pathogens could lead to millions of deaths by 2050. Thankfully, companies like Pfizer are taking action.
- Antimicrobial-resistant pathogens are one of the largest threats to global health today.
- As we get older, our immune systems age, increasing our risk of life threatening infections. Without reliable antibiotics, life expectancy could decline for the first time in modern history.
- If antibiotics become ineffective, common infections could result in hospitalization or even death. Life-saving interventions like cancer treatments and organ transplantation would become more difficult, more often resulting in death. Routine procedures would become hard to perform.
- Without intervention, resistant pathogens could result in 10 million annual deaths by 2050.
- By taking a multi-faceted approach—inclusive of adherence to good stewardship, surveillance and responsible manufacturing practices, as well as an emphasis on prevention and treatment—companies like Pfizer are fighting to help curb the spread.
Are we trying to solve too many problem with technological solutions?
- Technology has given humanity the amazing ability to fix almost any problem, conditioning us to search for technological remedies to what might be social problems.
- Alleviating social inequity is a problem that technology must necessarily attempt to solve, but technology alone cannot shape how humans assemble their societies.
- Only by emphasizing the primary place of individual identity, human dignity, and universal values like empathy and emotion, can we hope to solve global issues that, so far, technology has been unable to conquer.
Radical Transformational Leadership: Strategic Action for Change Agents
Progressive America would be half as big, but twice as populated as its conservative twin.
- America's two political tribes have consolidated into 'red' and 'blue' nations, with seemingly irreconcilable differences.
- Perhaps the best way to stop the infighting is to go for a divorce and give the two nations a country each
- Based on the UN's partition plan for Israel/Palestine, this proposal provides territorial contiguity and sea access to both 'red' and 'blue' America
Long hidden under trees, it's utterly massive
SMARTER FASTER trademarks owned by The Big Think, Inc. All rights reserved.