Florida officials banned from using the term 'climate change'

Since 2011 state officials have been restricted from using the phrase “climate change” in addition to a list of other terms surrounding environmental issues.

Tristram Korten from the Florida Center for Investigative Reporting reports on some environmental censorship going on the state level in Florida. Since 2011 officials have been restricted from using the phrase “climate change."

The Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) has been ordered not to use the term “climate change" or “global warming" in any communications or reports. The unwritten rule has been communicated to employees through word-of-mouth since Gov. Rick Scott took office in 2011. Of course, Scott doesn't believe that the climate crisis is man-made, so he has imposed the regulation on officials from speaking out about, you know, science.

One former employee spoke to Korten, saying how the regulation has impacted government reports as well as public policy and educational efforts throughout the state:

We were dealing with the effects and economic impact of climate change, and yet we can't reference it.

What's more, for a time the term “sea-level rise" was banned and supposed to be referred to as “nuisance flooding." This policy has forced officials to adopt a mish-mash of offbeat terms in order to refer to THE ISSUE THAT MUST NOT BE NAMED. So, instead of planning for rising sea levels, fluctuation in temperatures, and intense storm systems in the future, they talk about “sustainability efforts" and “resilience planning" as if they have to protect a toddler from learning about a well-known adult truth. But, according to another former employee, even “sustainability" is off-limits, giving scientists little to work with when trying to communicate a mounting issue.

Korten writes that there seemed to be progress in February when Scott acknowledged the rising oceans, committing $106 million to deal with the effects. But it's hardly a long-term plan, Korten writes:

$50 million of that is for a sewage plant in the Keys, and $25 million is for beach restoration, which critics say is hardly a comprehensive plan to protect homes, roads, and infrastructure.

Read more at Florida Center for Investigative Reporting.

Photo Credit: Shutterstock

Study: Selfies are perceived far more negatively than ‘posies’

In a new study, people who posted a lot of selfies were generally viewed as less likeable and more lonely.

Kim Kardashian/Instagram
Surprising Science
  • A new study examined how people perceive others' Instagram accounts, and whether those perceptions match up with how the posters rate their own personalities.
  • The results show that people react far more positively to "posies," which are photos of the poster taken by another person.
  • Still, it remains unclear exactly why people view selfies relatively negatively.
Keep reading Show less
Image source: History Archive / Universal Images Group via Getty Images
Politics & Current Affairs
  • Though we know today that his policies eventually ended the Great Depression, FDR's election was seen as disastrous by some.
  • A group of wealthy bankers decided to take things into their own hands; they plotted a coup against FDR, hoping to install a fascist dictator in its stead.
  • Ultimately, the coup was brought to light by General Smedley Butler and squashed before it could get off the ground.
Keep reading Show less

Vaping changes blood vessels after one use, even without nicotine

E-cigarettes may be safer than traditional cigarettes, but they come with their own risks.

John Keeble
Surprising Science
  • A new study used an MRI machine to examine how vaping e-cigarettes affects users' cardiovascular systems immediately after inhalation.
  • The results showed that vaping causes impaired circulation, stiffer arteries and less oxygen in their blood.
  • The new study adds to a growing body of research showing that e-cigarettes – while likely safer than traditional cigarettes – are far from harmless.
Keep reading Show less