Scientists test how to deflect asteroids with nuclear blasts
- Researchers studied strategies that could deflect a large asteroid from hitting Earth.
- They focused on the effect of detonating a nuclear device near an asteroid.
- Varying the amount and location of the energy released could affect the deflection.
Large asteroids don’t tend to hit Earth very often. But when they do, major cataclysms result. Remember the dinosaurs?
Add to this the fact that since 1998, scientists have detected about 25,000 near-Earth asteroids, while in 2020 alone, a record 107 of them came closer to our planet than the distance to the moon. With so many asteroids floating by, protecting our planet from impacts by these giant space bodies is an existential priority.
To prepare for the day when an asteroid will be heading our way, a joint study published in Acta Astronautica from the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) and the Air Force, looked at how to use neutron energy output from a nuclear blast to deflect such a threat.
The scientists devised sophisticated computer simulations to compare strategies that could divert an asteroid 300 meters in diameter. In particular, they aimed to identify the effects of neutron energies resulting from a nuclear “standoff” explosion on the space rock’s path. (A standoff detonation involves detonating a nuclear device near a space object — not on its surface.) The goal would be to deflect the asteroid rather than blow it up.
The researchers understood that they could affect an asteroid’s path by changing the distribution and strength of the released neutron energy. Directing the energy could influence how much melted and vaporized debris could be created and its speed, which in turn would alter the asteroid’s velocity. As the authors write in the paper, “Changing the neutron energy was found to have up to a 70% impact on deflection performance.”
The scientists see their work as a stepping stone in continuing research into how best to protect our planet. They plan to devise further simulations in order to comprehend more precisely the energy spread needed for the deflection strategy to work.
Lansing Horan IV led the research, while getting a nuclear engineering master’s degree at the Air Force Institute of Technology (AFIT) in a program with LLNL’s Planetary Defense and Weapon Output groups. Horan explained that their team decided to zero in on neutron radiation from a nuclear blast because neutrons are more penetrating than X-rays.
“This means that a neutron yield can potentially heat greater amounts of asteroid surface material, and therefore be more effective for deflecting asteroids than an X-ray yield,” he shared.
Another possible strategy for getting rid of an asteroid threat would be through so-called disruption. It essentially involves blowing the asteroid up, breaking it into tiny fast-moving pieces. Most of these shards should miss the Earth but around 0.5% could make it to the surface. The strategy does seem to have some drawbacks, however, if a larger asteroid came close to Earth. Exploding something like that could create a significant amount of calamity for the planet even if the whole asteroid didn’t graze us.
Horan thinks disruption may be more appropriate as a last-minute tactic “if the warning time before an asteroid impact is short and/or the asteroid is relatively small.”
Deflection is ultimately safer and less likely to produce negative consequences as it involves a smaller amount of energy than it would take to explode it. Horan said that over time, especially if we detect and deflect asteroids years before impact, even small changes in velocity should make them miss Earth.
While some may be understandably worried about using nuclear blasts close to Earth, Hogan sees it as something that may have to be considered in situations when time is of the essence.
“It is important that we further research and understand all asteroid mitigation technologies in order to maximize the tools in our toolkit,” Horan elaborated. “In certain scenarios, using a nuclear device to deflect an asteroid would come with several advantages over non-nuclear alternatives.”
One such scenario would be if there’s not enough warning and the approaching asteroid is large. In that case, a nuclear detonation might be “our only practical option for deflection and/or disruption,” proposed the scientist.