Rational Life Skills = "Cardinal" Virtues
Every New Year, old yearnings to live better are reborn. And many who make New Year’s resolutions of the “less vice, more virtue” kind, need a higher-resolution picture of some relevant language and history. The "cardinal virtues" didn't come from cardinals (and they're not religious relics). Nor are the deadly vices just irrational restrictions. Ignoring this logic is expensive.
Jag Bhalla is an entrepreneur, inventor and writer. His current project is Errors We Live By, a series of short exoteric essays exposing errors in the big ideas running our lives, details at www.errorsweliveby.com. His last book was I'm Not Hanging Noodles On Your Ears, a surreptitious science gift book from National Geographic Books, details at www.hangingnoodles.com. That explains his twitter handle @hangingnoodles.
Many who make “less vice, more virtue” New Year’s resolutions need a higher-resolution picture of some relevant language and history. The cardinal virtues and deadly vices aren’t religious relics or irrational restrictions, their logic is expensive to ignore.
1. “Cardinal virtues” weren’t invented by cardinals—they predate Christianity. Cardinal (from from Latin for “hinge, principal, or chief”) means chief priest. And “cardinal virtues” are those that life principally hinges on.
2. “Virtue,” meaning moral or religiously approved of behavior, shares a Latin root with virile: Vir = man, and virtus = manly strength. Virtues are praiseworthy moral strengths.
3. The four “cardinal virtues”—justice, temperance, prudence and courage—are from Plato. Greek philosophy’s influence on Christianity (and on educated first-century Jews like Saint Paul) is often underappreciated.
4. Aquinas (13th C) defined the "cardinal virtues” as natural as opposed to the “theological” virtues—faith, hope, and charity—as supernatural. The natural virtues encode and encourage what could be called rational life skills. Even for Aquinas they weren't about the afterlife, they’re about choosing a better after-in-life.
5. Take temperance = moderation (not abstinence), self-command of appetites. The opposite, overindulgence or addiction, is punished not supernaturally, but by biology. No faith required—nature’s scientific karma guarantees it. (Aristotle said every virtue had two related vices, insufficiency and excess, and a virtue’s use must match the context).
6. Similarly… life without justice isn’t desirable (every un-short-lived culture has a related mythology, e.g. Greeks Orestia, or American Westerns). Prudence is itself the exercise of reason. And without courage inertia is a risk in an uncertain world.
7. Whatever your position on the supernatural, how on earth can you ignore that logic? Nature’s logic as expressed in our evolution doesn’t, it put self-control, and rules (especially social rules aka morals), and justice into us.
8. Conversely, vices (from Latin “defect or offense”) have, since the 6th century, included seven deemed deadly—lust, gluttony, greed, sloth, wrath, envy and pride. (Note gluttony and sloth aren’t Ten Commandments inspired. And the Ten Commandments have only been called that since 1590, the original Hebrew means “Ten Sayings.”)
9. Whatever else religion does, it transmits norms and praiseworthy life skills. What’s the secular equivalent? Self-help? The norms of the arts? The norms of economics, with its private vices = public virtue ethical alchemy, which builds on greed and envy)?
The freer we are, the more vital virtues and rational life skills become. Only an unskilled use of reason leads to the belief that we can be safely left to our own devices—and vices. We often evidently don’t choose prudently. And resolutions to choose better reliably fail (see “Better Behaved Behavioral Models”).
How a cataclysm worse than what killed the dinosaurs destroyed 90 percent of all life on Earth.
While the demise of the dinosaurs gets more attention as far as mass extinctions go, an even more disastrous event called "the Great Dying” or the “End-Permian Extinction” happened on Earth prior to that. Now scientists discovered how this cataclysm, which took place about 250 million years ago, managed to kill off more than 90 percent of all life on the planet.
A new study discovers the “liking gap” — the difference between how we view others we’re meeting for the first time, and the way we think they’re seeing us.
We tend to be defensive socially. When we meet new people, we’re often concerned with how we’re coming off. Our anxiety causes us to be so concerned with the impression we’re creating that we fail to notice that the same is true of the other person as well. A new study led by Erica J. Boothby, published on September 5 in Psychological Science, reveals how people tend to like us more in first encounters than we’d ever suspect.
Using advanced laser technology, scientists at NASA will track global changes in ice with greater accuracy.
Leaving from Vandenberg Air Force base in California this coming Saturday, at 8:46 a.m. ET, the Ice, Cloud, and Land Elevation Satellite-2 — or, the "ICESat-2" — is perched atop a United Launch Alliance Delta II rocket, and when it assumes its orbit, it will study ice layers at Earth's poles, using its only payload, the Advance Topographic Laser Altimeter System (ATLAS).
SMARTER FASTER trademarks owned by The Big Think, Inc. All rights reserved.