Can "The Path's" Old Thoughts Give Us New Ways To See Ourselves (less WEIRDly)?

Chinese philosophers have suggested “You… should not think of yourself as a single, unified being.” The Path, a book by Michael Puett and Christine Gross-Loh, can explain (with help from Plato, Kant, Eden, Hume, Confucius, Kahnenman...).



Can "The Path's" Old Thoughts Give Us New Ways To See Ourselves (less WEIRDly)?

1  “The way we think we’re living our lives isn't the way we live them"—so startlingly says The Path, a book by Michael Puett and Christine Gross-Loh on often misrepresented Chinese philosophers (whose old thoughts can yield new ways to see ourselves, unWEIRDly).

2.1 “You… should not think of yourself as a single, unified being.” What you think is “you” is a set of patterns you’ve fallen into (just jumbled, usually unchosen habits).

2.2 Likewise, psychology’s “fundamental attribution error,” places “undue emphasis on internal characteristics” over situational factors.

2.3 Believing a “true self” lies ”within us” risks “concretizing destructive emotional habits,” and masks our malleability. But by honing emotional reactions, “you become the fruit of your labor.”

3.1 "The way we think we make decisions isn't how we make them." Science is relearning that we evolved to act quickly without “deciding” (via indirect rationality). But influential “rational choice theories” deny abundantly evident imprudence and muddling (feeding “rationalist delusions”).

3.2 Kahneman’s “Feeling is fast thinking” echoes Chinese vocabulary—mind and heart are the same word: xin—“heart-mind is the seat of our emotions... [and] the center of our rationality."

4.1 Confucius believed “every situation is unique.” Plato, however, sought abstract universalizable, timeless knowledge (preferences embodied deeply in geometry, algebra, and physics, all atomically built on sameness).

4.2 Confucian goodness isn’t “something you can define in the abstract.” Whereas Kant, following Plato, sought universal abstract rules, like, never lie, even to murderers about victim whereabouts.

4.3 Our word “knowing” is overworked, but Hebrew distinguishes knowing abstractly from “da’at”: knowing by concrete particular relationship.

4.4 Supporting Confucius over Kant, Eden’s “tree of knowledge of good and evil” uses da’at.

5. Plato’s pupil Aristotle preferred concreteness and promoted situationally apt virtues. Likewise, The Wuxing’s “Inward Training” teaches dynamically orchestrating virtues, harmonizing contextually, never overemphasizing one element (echoing Aristotle’s every virtue has two related vices—contextual deficiency, or excess).

6. “True spontaneity” takes “years of experience,” as in jazz, only skilled freedom works well.

7. Mindfulness = skilled, responsive engagement (≠ detachment + acceptance).

8.1 Chinese ideas fed Europe’s EnlightenmentVoltaire used 16th century Jesuit China mission accounts to contrast Chinese rationality with “the absurdities of European customs.”

8.2 Hume claimed “Reason is and ought only to be the slave of the passions, and can never pretend to any other office than to serve and obey them.”

8.3 Millennia earlier the Wuxing counselled reason to slowly retrain those master passions.

Illustration by Julia Suits, The New Yorker Cartoonist & author of The Extraordinary Catalog of Peculiar Inventions.

Golden blood: The rarest blood in the world

We explore the history of blood types and how they are classified to find out what makes the Rh-null type important to science and dangerous for those who live with it.

What is the rarest blood type?

Abid Katib/Getty Images
Surprising Science
  • Fewer than 50 people worldwide have 'golden blood' — or Rh-null.
  • Blood is considered Rh-null if it lacks all of the 61 possible antigens in the Rh system.
  • It's also very dangerous to live with this blood type, as so few people have it.
Keep reading Show less

How space debris created the world’s largest garbage dump

Since 1957, the world's space agencies have been polluting the space above us with countless pieces of junk, threatening our technological infrastructure and ability to venture deeper into space.

Space debris orbiting Earth

Framestock via Adobe Stock
Technology & Innovation
  • Space debris is any human-made object that's currently orbiting Earth.
  • When space debris collides with other space debris, it can create thousands more pieces of junk, a dangerous phenomenon known as the Kessler syndrome.
  • Radical solutions are being proposed to fix the problem, some of which just might work. (See the video embedded toward the end of the article.)
Keep reading Show less

Looking for something? A team at MIT develop a robot that sees through walls

It uses radio waves to pinpoint items, even when they're hidden from view.

TORU YAMANAKA/AFP via Getty Images
Technology & Innovation
In recent years, robots have gained artificial vision, touch, and even smell.
Keep reading Show less