User Acquisition

(The image to the left is from a Nancy Duarte presentation on the emotional path people travel down during great presentations)


I was having drinks last evening with a startup that had a very innovative model, but was facing a familiar problem - user acquisition.  They wanted to engage users deeply and have each user spread their service to friends like wildfire.

Our resulting discussion meandered around the success of foursquare, turntable, and social games. From there, we started discussing the measurement of how viruses spread - the conversation quickly turned to an almost indecipherable discussion of K-Factors, Net Promoter Scores and seed audiences. I tried to turn that conversation into a useable reference below:

What is a K-Factor?

The concept of a K-Factor is the most important one when it comes to user acquisition, it comes from the study of Virology (infectious diseases) and is a measure of how many new organisms a single host will infect, while that host remains infected itself. A K-Factor of 1 means that the infected group will persist at exactly the same size over time (every infected organism infects one more organism before developing an immunity for itself). 

Therefore, having a K-Factor of >1 means that the infection is now capable of "going viral." When introduced to a seed audience, the infection will grow over time to the broader population (until it saturates the available population and starts being starved out of new hosts). 

As unpleasant as it is to compare Marketing to infectious diseases, there are some lessons we can learn from Virology. At it's core, Marketing is really an effort to spread an idea or activity to a larger population; so we can use K-Factors (also known as a Viral Coefficients) to measure how quickly our efforts will spread through a target audience.

Master the K-Factor

I could write about all the tactics discovered in the early days of the Facebook Platform when everyone from RockYou to Slide and from Stanford to Involver was trying to crack the code, but there's already quite a lot written about it, so instead I've given you my suggested reading/watching list:

My introduction to this effort came from listening to Jia Shen from RockYou talk about how they managed their business - this included how they built, tested, launched, tweaked, and then scaled very large simple social games. I was able to track down a good video of Jia giving this presentation in 2007 (Nick, thanks for posting this).

If you're interested in understanding and improving your viral growth, read The Four Viral App Objectives written in 2008 by Yee Lee. Then try some classics from Andrew Chen, Eston Bond, and also read this analysis of Farmville. Then, read the book Viral Loop, for some success stories.

How can I make it simpler?

Here's a heuristic that I think generally works well for guiding experience design towards more viral outcomes. 

Assume that every application can be rated by two factors:

  • How motivated is the average user?
  • What are the barriers to entry you want a user to get past?
  • Your job in designing an experience is to create enough motivation in the average user that they sail through any barriers placed in their way. You can do this by increasing the stakes and motivating your users more, or by decreasing the barriers and making it easier for them. 

    Every increase past this threshold makes users exponentially more likely to share your app; either organically or because you've asked them to. 

    Simply put, if your average user is very motivated and the barriers to using your app are comparably small, you are likely to have a much easier time acquiring users than most.

    If you look at all virally built audiences, from riots and revolutions to simple Facebook apps, I think the idea that motivation will always significantly trump barriers will hold true.  The faster an audience spreads, the wider the gap is between motivation and barriers, and the higher the K-Factor.

    However - if these apps are not providing true utility to users (or a reason to come back), then the average user doesn't last very long, and you end up quickly reaching your desired audience, but not being able to get them to interact, engage deeply, or return in the future.

    The more utility your app is providing and the more commitment it's asking for from the user, the more motivated a user is going to have to be to engage with it and (therefore) the harder you'll have to work to acquire users. However, the more utility you provide, the easier engagement and re-engagement will become.

    Here are some other fantastic posts on this topic:

  • A brilliant analysis of why Turntable.fm was so successful [Quora]
  • How did Mint get 1.5m+ users [Quora]
  • What are good examples of Virality Design Patterns [Quora]
  • ---

    PostScript

    Finally, yes - it's been months since I've posted here, and I apologize for that.

    I left Involver about 90 days ago to work on a stealth startup with some friends and, to understate the matter, this has had a bit of an impact on my schedule. I love my work, but my blogging has fallen by the wayside. 

    I'm still not ready to discuss the details of my new venture, but at some point relatively soon, I plan to share both what I'm working on now, as well as stories and lessons from my time at Involver.  

    In case your curious, Involver hasn't slowed at all and has already accomplished many amazing things since my departure (passing half a million customerslaunching a japanese venture,presenting at Dreamforce and making impressive additions to their leadership team). I'm supremely proud of the time I spent there and the team that continues working there.

    ​There are two kinds of failure – but only one is honorable

    Malcolm Gladwell teaches "Get over yourself and get to work" for Big Think Edge.

    Big Think Edge
    • Learn to recognize failure and know the big difference between panicking and choking.
    • At Big Think Edge, Malcolm Gladwell teaches how to check your inner critic and get clear on what failure is.
    • Subscribe to Big Think Edge before we launch on March 30 to get 20% off monthly and annual memberships.
    Keep reading Show less

    Why the ocean you know and love won’t exist in 50 years

    Can sensitive coral reefs survive another human generation?

    Videos
    • Coral reefs may not be able to survive another human decade because of the environmental stress we have placed on them, says author David Wallace-Wells. He posits that without meaningful changes to policies, the trend of them dying out, even in light of recent advances, will continue.
    • The World Wildlife Fund says that 60 percent of all vertebrate mammals have died since just 1970. On top of this, recent studies suggest that insect populations may have fallen by as much as 75 percent over the last few decades.
    • If it were not for our oceans, the planet would probably be already several degrees warmer than it is today due to the emissions we've expelled into the atmosphere.
    Keep reading Show less

    Why modern men are losing their testosterone

    Research has shown that men today have less testosterone than they used to. What's happening?

    Flickr user Tom Simpson
    Sex & Relationships
    • Several studies have confirmed that testosterone counts in men are lower than what they used to be just a few decades ago.
    • While most men still have perfectly healthy testosterone levels, its reduction puts men at risk for many negative health outcomes.
    • The cause of this drop in testosterone isn't entirely clear, but evidence suggests that it is a multifaceted result of modern, industrialized life.
    Keep reading Show less

    Health care: Information tech must catch up to medical marvels

    Michael Dowling, Northwell Health's CEO, believes we're entering the age of smart medicine.

    Photo: Tom Werner / Getty Images
    Sponsored by Northwell Health
    • The United States health care system has much room for improvement, and big tech may be laying the foundation for those improvements.
    • Technological progress in medicine is coming from two fronts: medical technology and information technology.
    • As information technology develops, patients will become active participants in their health care, and value-based care may become a reality.
    Keep reading Show less