How "Morality Voters" Justify Voting for Donald Trump

It seems difficult to explain why evangelical Christians swung their vote toward Donald J. Trump in the 2016 Presidential Election.

We often think of morality as rule-based. The Ten Commandments, for example, are closely held by Christians as the defining rules of human behavior. Given this, it seems difficult to explain why evangelical Christians swung their vote toward Donald J. Trump in the 2016 Presidential Election.


Indeed Franklin Graham — son of the famous Christian evangelical Billy Graham — is a happy man. Satisfied that God is intervening in American affairs, he claims that claims prayer has catapulted Trump, and vice president-elect Mike Pence, into office.

Graham wasn’t always so upbeat. The preacher repeatedly bashed Barack Obama for being ‘anti-Christian.’ After being outwardly skeptical of President Obama's faith, he issued a formal apology in 2012 — then rescinded it when Obama passed legislation supporting same-sex marriage rights.

There are two clues to understanding Graham’s support of Trump, dating back to at least 2011 when the evangelical leader stated he was his preferred candidate.

First, Trump’s anti-Muslim rhetoric. Amazingly, Graham tied in Obama’s support for LGBT rights to his Islamic upbringing, which requires two suspensions of disbelief given radical Islam’s intolerance of gays and the fact that Obama has never been Muslim.

Then there’s Graham’s fanboy attitude toward Vladimir Putin. In a column published by the Billy Graham Evangelistic Association, he writes about Putin’s anti-gay platform.

In my opinion, Putin is right on these issues. Obviously, he may be wrong about many things, but he has taken a stand to protect his nation’s children from the damaging effects of any gay and lesbian agenda.

It should surprise no one that Graham is praising Trump for his pro-Putin attitude given his disdain for anything progressive regarding same-sex rights.

In many ways, Graham represents the evangelical—specifically, the white evangelical voter—mindset, one that has predominantly expressed disease with the Obama administration. In 2012 Obama garnered just 20 percent of the evangelical vote to Romney’s 79 percent, surprising in that Graham and others stated that Mormonism is not really a Christian sect. These numbers were down from 26 percent for Obama with the same group in 2008. In 2016 Hillary Clinton captured just 16 percent of evangelical voters compared to Trump’s 81 percent.

Clarion calls for evangelical ballot checkmarks have long been religious: abortion, same-sex marriage, infidelity. Their moral card is pronounced and marketed throughout the campaign. Yet it’s incredibly plastic. Every four years their demands shift, which explains how a thrice-married businessman with fidelity problems and previous endorsement of women’s rights could command the largest evangelical vote of this century.

A recent survey conducted by the Public Religion Research Institute puts this into perspective. Asking voters if private immoral acts will affect the ethical responsibilities of elected officials, the group that shifted most was the religious.

Americans without any religious affiliation haven’t shifted much—63 percent in 2011, 60 percent today. Catholic acceptance of politicians’ personal misconduct has increased from 42 to 58 percent. White mainline Protestant support is up by 22 points, from 38 to 60 percent.

The biggest shift, however, was found in one specific group: white evangelicals. In 2011, 30 percent of that demographic claimed that a politician acting immorally behind closed doors can still be an upstanding moral leader. In the era of Trump that number has surged to 72 percent. Likewise, white evangelicals that believe religious beliefs are ‘very important’ for potential presidents dropped from 64 to 49 percent.

This should effectively destroy the myth of the single-issue voter, especially as it pertains to religious topics. Yet given the constant flip-flopping on pretty much every issue over the past year-and-a-half by the evangelical’s clear winner—morals tweeted in the morning can be overturned and returned the same day—we should not be surprised if such numbers shift again in four years. Or four minutes.

Then, like now, the past will be conveniently forgotten because the future looks so much more important given their current whims. All of which makes us ask, does religion truly matter anymore? Did it ever?

--

Derek's next book, Whole Motion: Training Your Brain and Body For Optimal Health, will be published on 7/4/17 by Carrel/Skyhorse Publishing. He is based in Los Angeles. Stay in touch on Facebook and Twitter.

LinkedIn meets Tinder in this mindful networking app

Swipe right to make the connections that could change your career.

Getty Images
Sponsored
Swipe right. Match. Meet over coffee or set up a call.

No, we aren't talking about Tinder. Introducing Shapr, a free app that helps people with synergistic professional goals and skill sets easily meet and collaborate.

Keep reading Show less

What’s behind our appetite for self-destruction?

Is it "perverseness," the "death drive," or something else?

Photo by Brad Neathery on Unsplash
Mind & Brain

Each new year, people vow to put an end to self-destructive habits like smoking, overeating or overspending.

Keep reading Show less

Can the keto diet help treat depression? Here’s what the science says so far

A growing body of research shows promising signs that the keto diet might be able to improve mental health.

Photo: Public Domain
Mind & Brain
  • The keto diet is known to be an effective tool for weight loss, however its effects on mental health remain largely unclear.
  • Recent studies suggests that the keto diet might be an effective tool for treating depression, and clearing up so-called "brain fog," though scientists caution more research is necessary before it can be recommended as a treatment.
  • Any experiments with the keto diet are best done in conjunction with a doctor, considering some people face problems when transitioning to the low-carb diet.
Keep reading Show less

Douglas Rushkoff – It’s not the technology’s fault

It's up to us humans to re-humanize our world. An economy that prioritizes growth and profits over humanity has led to digital platforms that "strip the topsoil" of human behavior, whole industries, and the planet, giving less and less back. And only we can save us.

Think Again Podcasts
  • It's an all-hands-on-deck moment in the arc of civilization.
  • Everyone has a choice: Do you want to try to earn enough money to insulate yourself from the world you're creating— or do you want to make the world a place you don't have to insulate yourself from?
Keep reading Show less