Are Science and Religion Compatible?
George Church is a professor of genetics at Harvard Medical School and a professor of health sciences and technology at Harvard and MIT. In 1984, Church, along with Walter Gilbert, developed the first direct genomic sequencing method and helped initiate the Human Genome Project. Church is responsible for inventing the concepts of molecular multiplexing and tags, homologous recombination methods, and DNA array synthesizers. Church initiated the Personal Genome Project in 2005 as well as research into synthetic biology. He is director of the U.S. Department of Energy Center on Bioenergy at Harvard and MIT and director of the National Institutes of Health Center of Excellence in Genomic Science at Harvard, MIT and Washington University. He is a senior editor for Nature EMBO Molecular Systems Biology.
Question: Can science and religion coexist?
George Church:I think that while science and religion . . .
Science has very definite faith components, and most religions don’t stick to faith. They venture out into making predictions about our physical world. They don’t just say there’s something that is completely unconnected to us. They say actually it affects a lot. And when they do that they merge.
We know that there is a connection between our feelings and our brain. Our brain is something that we can study scientifically. So I think they can and should coexist.
There’s a lot of faith expressed by scientists about science. It’s kind of an act of faith that science is a good thing. We don’t know that for sure. We may not know that millions of years from now. And by good things, even phrasing goodness in a scientific context like survival of the species would be something that probably scientists would agree is a good thing. We won’t know whether science is a good thing for the survival of species rather than having entirely faith-based. So I think these things are fair. They are solvable. They are addressable. We can bring them together, but it requires less extreme views, or what would benefit from less extreme views.
Recorded on: July 6, 2007
Science has very definite faith components, and most religions don’t stick to faith.
Recycling is linear, but the economy shouldn't be.
Too often the concept of a circular economy is muddled up with some kind of advanced recycling process that would mean keeping our industrial system as it is and preserving a growing consumption model.
Your microbiome begins in your mouth. Why don't we look there more often?
- Eighty percent of patients who've had heart attacks have gum disease, says Dr. Shahrzad Fattahi.
- Oral health is also implicated in forms of cancer, dementia, canker sores, and more.
- Fattahi says the future of medicine must also focus on saliva, as a whole new field of salivary diagnostics is emerging.
Could your urge to check emails — instead of finishing that major project — be a response to an uncomfortable emotional state?
- It's easy to stumble down a rabbit hole when we consider the action beneficial like checking emails, stock prices, or sports scores.
- However, if these seemingly beneficial actions take the place of something else we intended to do, they're just distractions. And we've been moved to these distraction as a psychological response to discomfort.
- The truth is that distraction comes from within, and time management is just another form of pain management.