If You Can’t Stand Being Tickled, Why Are You Laughing?

The science behind tickling and why such an unpleasant experience makes us laugh.

You might think it’s hard to tickle yourself because, like any good joke that makes you laugh, there has to be an element of surprise involved. And that’s sort of true. But it turns out that the laugh tickling produces isn’t at all because you find being tickled funny. The mechanics behind tickling are much more interesting.


When someone tickles you, according to Sarah-Jayne Blakemore, a research fellow at the Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience at University College London, two areas of the brain respond: the somatosensory cortex and the anterior cingulate cortex.

Jkwchui, NIH

So, to answer our original question, when you try to tickle yourself, your cerebellum, which monitors your movements, basically calls off the whole tickle response system by letting it know the sensation it’s about to pick up is actually just you trying to make yourself laugh. But let’s not stop yet.

It turns out there are two types of tickling, both of which, perhaps surprisingly, fall into the category of unpleasant sensations.

Knismesis is a light irritation of a sensitive area, usually by touch. (A gentle electric current will also do the trick.) You can get it from a bug crawling on you, or a hair flicking your skin. Other animals also experience knismesis — in fact, it’s what allows a nose rub to hypnotize an attacking shark (don’t try this at home).

Gargalesis is the more hard-core kind of tickling that involves gales of laughter produced by someone else applying heavier pressure to sensitive areas of your body. (Someone who’s really ticklish has hypergargalesthesia.)

Penn State

Gargalesis is particularly hard to trigger in yourself. It’s also far more unpleasant than knismesis, and thus produces a stronger response.

So, wait, being tickled is unpleasant? Odds are you’re skeptical if you’re the one doing the tickling. If you’re the one being tickled, though, you know it’s true. So why do we laugh when we’re tickled?

Scientist have been trying to figure this out. A recent study at the University of Tuebingen in Germany used an MRI to test subjects’ response to both jokes and tickling. For both, their brains’ Rolandic operculum lit up when they laughed.

But with tickling, a second area also fired off: the hypothalamus. This is the area of the brain that triggers the primitive desire to flee danger. And really, both these impulses are clearly evident in someone being tickled.

The researchers believe the activation of the hypothalamus indicates that our response to tickling may be a primitive defense mechanism to signal submissiveness in the face of a dominating foe.

More evidence of this: "When you tickle someone, you actually stimulate the unmyelinated nerve fibers that cause pain,” Dr. Alan Hirsch, founder of the Smell & Taste Treatment and Research Foundation in Chicago told the Daily Mail.

Maybe it’s okay that we can’t tickle ourselves.

Headline image: Robby Berman

LinkedIn meets Tinder in this mindful networking app

Swipe right to make the connections that could change your career.

Getty Images
Sponsored
Swipe right. Match. Meet over coffee or set up a call.

No, we aren't talking about Tinder. Introducing Shapr, a free app that helps people with synergistic professional goals and skill sets easily meet and collaborate.

Keep reading Show less

10 books to check out from Jordan Peterson's 'Great Books' list

The Canadian professor has an extensive collection posted on his site.

Jordan Peterson with Carl Jung and the cover art of Jaak Panksepp's 'Affective Neuroscience' (Image: Chris Williamson/Getty Images/Big Think)
Personal Growth
  • Peterson's Great Books list features classics by Orwell, Jung, Huxley, and Dostoevsky.
  • Categories include literature, neuroscience, religion, and systems analysis.
  • Having recently left Patreon for "freedom of speech" reasons, Peterson is taking direct donations through Paypal (and Bitcoin).
Keep reading Show less

26 ultra-rich people own as much as the world's 3.8 billion poorest

The Oxfam report prompted Anand Giridharadas to tweet: "Don't be Pinkered into everything's-getting-better complacency."

Getty Images and Wikimedia Commons
Politics & Current Affairs
  • A new report by Oxfam argues that wealth inequality is causing poverty and misery around the world.
  • In the last year, the world's billionaires saw their wealth increase by 12%, while the poorest 3.8 billion people on the planet lost 11% of their wealth.
  • The report prompted Anand Giridharadas to tweet: "Don't be Pinkered into everything's-getting-better complacency." We explain what Steven Pinker's got to do with it.
Keep reading Show less

Should you invest in China's stock market? Know this one thing first.

Despite incredible economic growth, it is not necessarily an investor's paradise.

Videos
  • China's stock market is just 27 years old. It's economy has grown 30x over that time.
  • Imagine if you had invested early and gotten in on the ground floor.
  • Actually, you would have lost money. Here's how that's possible.