Study quantifies the effects of political lobbying on climate policy
A new first-of-its-kind study puts a number on how political lobbyists can change the course of climate policy.
- The new study uses a statistical analysis based on exhaustive lobbying records.
- The results show that lobbying by firms expected to lose money as a result of legislation was significantly more effective in the case of the American Clean Energy and Security Act.
- The study authors suggest their results can help lawmakers better pass regulation in the future.
How much power do lobbyists wield when it comes to enacting climate change policy? A first-of-its-kind study, published in the journal Nature Climate Change, explores that question by focusing on one prominent example from recent history.
In 2009, American lawmakers had the chance to pass what would've been among the most comprehensive climate change regulation to date: the American Clean Energy and Security Act, also known as the Waxman–Markey bill. The bill was based on a cap-and-trade system in which the government would've issued a set number of permits to companies that allowed them to produce emissions, and these companies would've been able to buy and sell these permits among each other.
The bill passed in the House but never made it to the Senate floor, setting the tone for climate change regulation in the U.S. in the following decade. Why did it fail? For one, climate change regulation often doesn't pass because of weak incentives: Why should one jurisdiction suffer the costs of regulation when it can benefit from the reductions of others? Beyond that, how much of a role did lobbying play in the process?
Using a statistical analysis based on lobbying records, the authors found that lobbying lowered the probability of the Waxman–Markey bill passing by 13 percent (55 to 42 percent), resulting in an estimated social cost of $60 billion. Two general findings emerged:
"First, we find that firms that are expected to lose are more effective at lobbying to lower the policy's chances than firms that are expected to gain are at lobbying to raise the policy's chances," the authors wrote. "Second, regardless of whether a firm gains or loses, there are diminishing returns to lobbying."
The authors weren't quite sure why lobbying from oppositional firms proved to be more effective. But they said their results suggest that "subtle design changes to market-based climate policies can alleviate political opposition and increase chances of adoption," as study author Kyle Meng, an economist and UC Santa Barbara professor, told UC Sanata Barbara's The Current.
The Waxman–Markey bill, for example, would've issued free permits to some firms. If regulators had identified the firms expected to lose from the bill, and then made an effort to issue free permits to those same companies, the likely result would've been less oppositional lobbying.
"Our findings also provide a glimmer of hope by paving a path toward more politically robust climate policies," Meng said.
- Fossil Fuel Interests Have Outspent Environmental Advocates 10:1 ... ›
- Top oil firms spending millions lobbying to block climate change ... ›
- Research: Who's Lobbying Congress on Climate Change ›
What can 3D printing do for medicine? The "sky is the limit," says Northwell Health researcher Dr. Todd Goldstein.
- Medical professionals are currently using 3D printers to create prosthetics and patient-specific organ models that doctors can use to prepare for surgery.
- Eventually, scientists hope to print patient-specific organs that can be transplanted safely into the human body.
- Northwell Health, New York State's largest health care provider, is pioneering 3D printing in medicine in three key ways.
- In some fundamental ways, humans haven't changed all that much since the days when we were sitting around communal fires, telling tales.
- Although we don't always recognize them as such, stories, symbols, and rituals still have tremendous, primal power to move us and shape our lives.
- This is no less true in the workplace than it is in our personal lives.
One of Stephen Hawking's predictions seems to have been borne out in a man-made "black hole".
- Stephen Hawking predicted virtual particles splitting in two from the gravitational pull of black holes.
- Black holes, he also said, would eventually evaporate due to the absorption of negatively charged virtual particles.
- A scientist has built a black hole analogue based on sound instead of light.
- The word "creative" is sometimes waved around like a badge of honor. We speak of creativity in hushed tones, as the special province of the "talented". In reality, the creative process is messy, open, and vulnerable.
- For this reason, creativity is often at its best in a group setting like brainstorming. But in order to work, the group creative process needs to be led by someone who understands it.
- This sense of deep trust—that no idea is too silly, that every creative impulse is worth voicing and considering—is essential to producing great work.
SMARTER FASTER trademarks owned by The Big Think, Inc. All rights reserved.