from the world's big
Cancer drugs are the most profitable for Big Pharma
In 2018, cancer drugs earned the pharmaceutical industry $123.8 billion. Soon, they'll be worth billions more.
- A recent report from Evaluate shows oncological therapies were the most profitable in 2018.
- The report projects cancer drug sales to nearly double by 2024, pocketing a tidy $236.6 billion in profit.
- These projections come at a time when 42 percent of cancer patients lose their life savings to afford treatment.
The pharmaceutical industry's top earners are cancer drugs — a sentence that will be read to the surprise of no one. When sussing out why oncological therapies cost so much, the usual suspect is research and development (R&D). It takes years to develop a drug, deep pockets to fund that development, and then more time to take a drug through the FDA's laborious approval process.
A 2017 paper published in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) examined contemporary R&D costs for cancer drugs. The researchers analyzed the US Securities and Exchange Commission filings for 10 cancer drugs. They found the median time to develop a new drug was 7.3 years and the median cost to be $648 million.
That's an extraordinary risk. Surely pharmaceutical companies deserve the right to recoup those expenses and squirrel away some profit for future R&D. Right?
The answer is, obviously, yes. However, a recent report by consultancy Evaluate shows those profits to be in excess of a tidy sum.
Another day, another billion
In the infographic above, data journalist Katharina Buchholz shows Evaluate's data for worldwide sales of prescription and over-the-counter (OTC) drugs. As you can see, cancer drugs handily took the number one spot in 2018 and yielded the industry $123.8 billion worldwide. That results in a worldwide market share of 14.3 percent.
By 2024, Evaluate projects cancer drug sales to nearly double to $236.6 billion, increasing its worldwide market share to nearly 20 percent of prescription and OTC drugs. That makes oncological therapies worth more than the next five drug therapies combined.
The report forecasts the main drivers of this success to be Keytruda and Humira. Owned by Merck & Co. and AbbVie, respectively, the two cancer drugs are estimated to earn a combined $29 billion in 2024.
In total, the top 15 therapy areas will earn $1.2 trillion for the pharmaceutical industry in 2024.
Is R&D to blame?
A tray is prepared to administer an Yttrium-90 radioembolization procedure to a patient with liver cancer.
What about the argument that exorbitant R&D costs force pharmaceutical companies to charge such extravagant prices? As the JAMA study showed, the costs and time associated with drug development are certainly immense by quotidian standards. And Evaluate's data back up that research.
According to the report, the Swiss company Roche is the industry's top spender, investing $9.8 billion in R&D in 2018. The company is expected to spend another $9.9 billion in 2024, alongside competitor Johnson & Johnson. All told, the pharmaceutical industry's R&D investment will total $213 billion in 2024.
But that figure accounts for all R&D spending, not just cancer drugs. If Evaluate's projections are correct, the profits from cancer drugs alone would cover R&D expenses with $23.6 billion to spare. If we consider the industry's total projected 2024 profits, the surplus is $1,009 billion.
"[T]he industry's claims that high prices are vital to fund innovation are demonstrably false, according to economists who research how drug companies allocate money," cultural historian Lynn Stuart Parramore writes. "The truth is that many of these companies use profits reaped from their exorbitant prices to wheel and deal with Wall Street instead of developing new and more effective medicines."
Parramore further points out that the largest drug companies no longer develop drugs in house. As we've seen, Keytruda earns Merck billions, but the pharma powerhouse didn't foot its R&D bill. The drug was initially developed by Organon International before the Dutch company was acquired by Schering-Plough in 2007, which in turn merged with Merck in 2009.
A life for a life savings
True, there are other expenses to consider beyond R&D, including overhead, marketing, and, of course, battalions of patent lawyers. Tahir Amin, an attorney practicing in intellectual property law, also reminds us that many people in the pharmaceutical industry, especially scientists and researchers, remain driven to treat illnesses and improve lives.
But as he told Big Think in an interview, the business side prioritizes healthy stocks over healthy people:
And I think [much as been] lost in the process as pharmaceutical companies now really start to look at their bottom line and their shareholders and what the investors want rather than what their original purpose was — to help people become healthier. And I think that the bargain of that has tilted more towards the financialization of things rather than thinking about health first.
Making these inordinate gains a bitterer pill is that they come when patients are expunging their life savings to afford treatment. As reported by Big Think's Derek Beres, 42 percent of new cancer patients deplete their life savings during the first two years of treatment.
Of the 9.5 million cancer diagnoses analyzed in a study, the average costs came to $92,098. But that's just an average. In one case, the parents of a cancer-stricken girl spent $1,691,627.45 on her treatment. She died on her sixth birthday.
As Parramore concludes: "The status quo is unhealthy for anyone except pharmaceutical company executives. Drug companies need a new business model that gets them back into the business of making the drugs Americans need at prices we can all afford to pay."
As the world population continues to age and live longer, cancer rates will continue in tandem. Unless drastic changes occur, it looks as though Big Pharma has some salubrious years to look forward to.
- The public “deserve to know” that there is an overlooked subset of ... ›
- 4 beneficial evolutionary mutations that humans are undergoing ... ›
- The disturbing relationship between pharma and advocacy groups - Big Think ›
Join multiple Tony and Emmy Award-winning actress Judith Light live on Big Think at 2 pm ET on Monday.
Your favorite color can be linked to various personality traits, motivation, and productivity levels in your life.
- Color psychology has been used in marketing and branding for years, but research in the last decade has taken color psychology and applied it to human personality traits.
- Colors aren't merely associated with various feelings but can actually shape our perceptions and personalities.
- Various studies across multiple years have given us insight into what each color represents in regards to our personality, work ethic, and motivation levels.
What is color psychology?<img type="lazy-image" data-runner-src="https://assets.rebelmouse.io/eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.eyJpbWFnZSI6Imh0dHBzOi8vYXNzZXRzLnJibC5tcy8yMjkzNDU4MC9vcmlnaW4ucG5nIiwiZXhwaXJlc19hdCI6MTY0Mzc2Mzk4NX0.KqHFgzhzl-dKmUvgDZsYGEDgDPVU40mA2mV1GLb1a68/img.png?width=1500&coordinates=0%2C0%2C0%2C0&height=1314" id="109d8" class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="42ec0b499017c39ed1e3df32308370c2" data-rm-shortcode-name="rebelmouse-image" alt="The Logo Company color marketing infographic" />
Colors have been used strategically in branding for years.
Image by The Logo Company<p>Many people are unaware of the impact colors have on our thoughts, emotions, and behaviors in everyday life.</p><p>It's extremely likely that you have purchased something in a store or chosen one product over another due to what brands call color marketing: targeting brands, colors, and adverts based on colors that will influence you to buy. </p><p>You can see in the infographic above that companies that want to be associated with dependability (Dell, HP, IBM) use the color blue. Companies that want to be known for being exciting and fun (Fanta, Amazon, Nickelodeon) use a splash or orange. </p><p>Color psychology is being used around us every single day and not only in what brands we buy, but also in how we react to our environment. Extending color psychology into the realm of personalities is about proving that colors aren't just about what looks the best, but about what meaning we subconsciously attach to those colors, and how to use that to benefit our lives.</p>
What your favorite color says about your personality<img type="lazy-image" data-runner-src="https://assets.rebelmouse.io/eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.eyJpbWFnZSI6Imh0dHBzOi8vYXNzZXRzLnJibC5tcy8yMjkzNTc2Ny9vcmlnaW4uanBnIiwiZXhwaXJlc19hdCI6MTY0NTc2MTU1NH0.iLH4yQoMFZMDW1YJo1YRMR8jOZDfDd3PFdu_IynkBcM/img.jpg?width=980" id="6e5e9" class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="5b38c0f7793933f9ab35a61a2f7bb14a" data-rm-shortcode-name="rebelmouse-image" alt="child holding crayons" />
A new study looks at what would happen to human language on a long journey to other star systems.
- A new study proposes that language could change dramatically on long space voyages.
- Spacefaring people might lose the ability to understand the people of Earth.
- This scenario is of particular concern for potential "generation ships".
Generation Ships<span style="display:block;position:relative;padding-top:56.25%;" class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="a1e6445c7168d293a6da3f9600f534a2"><iframe type="lazy-iframe" data-runner-src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/H2f0Wd3zNj0?rel=0" width="100%" height="auto" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" style="position:absolute;top:0;left:0;width:100%;height:100%;"></iframe></span>
Many of the most popular apps are about self-improvement.
Emotions are the newest hot commodity, and we can't get enough.