Atheists seen as immoral, even by fellow Atheists, reveals new study
A new study reveals a worldwide moral prejudice against atheists.
A new study, notably titled “Global evidence of extreme intuitive moral prejudice against atheists," claims that atheists are more readily suspected of bad deeds than Christians, Muslims, Hindus or Buddhists. Even other atheists tend to have the same biases against fellow atheists.
To the researchers this indicates that while the world may be getting more secular, there is still a prevailing view that people cannot be moral and will do bad things if they don't live in fear of punishment from an omnipotent, all-knowing God.
But does morality require faith? Writing in the journal Nature Human Behavior, the researchers say that the study points to the fact that “across the world, religious belief is intuitively viewed as a necessary safeguard against the temptations of grossly immoral conduct." Their study shows, they argue, that “atheists are broadly perceived as potentially morally depraved and dangerous".
The study reflected attitudes of over 3,000 people in 13 countries. These included secular countries like China and the Netherlands as well as countries with many religious believers like India, the United States and United Arab Emirates. Different faiths were represented as some of the countries had predominantly Christian, Hindu, Muslim and Buddhist populations.
The study's participants had to react to a fictional situation where they were told to judge a serial killer who mutilated homeless people. Tellingly, when they had to guess the likelihood of the evil character being an atheist or a religious believer, the participants were twice as likely to suppose the sadistic serial killer was an atheist.
They study's co-author Will Gervais, a psychology professor at the University of Kentucky in Lexington, told AFP that remarkably “even atheists appear to hold the same intuitive anti-atheist bias."
"I suspect that this stems from the prevalence of deeply entrenched pro-religious norms," he added. “Even in places that are currently quite overtly secular, people still seem to intuitively hold on to the belief that religion is a moral safeguard."
There were two secular countries, Finland and New Zealand, where the experiment did not show conclusive enough evidence of an anti-atheist prejudice. The more religious a country, the stronger its distrust of atheists.
The researchers hope their study will be an advance “in explaining the prevalence of anti-atheist attitudes." That's important, they point out, because "in many places, atheism can be dangerous, if not fatal."
You can read the study here, in Nature Human Behavior.
- The meaning of the word 'confidence' seems obvious. But it's not the same as self-esteem.
- Confidence isn't just a feeling on your inside. It comes from taking action in the world.
- Join Big Think Edge today and learn how to achieve more confidence when and where it really matters.
One victim can break our hearts. Remember the image of the young Syrian boy discovered dead on a beach in Turkey in 2015? Donations to relief agencies soared after that image went viral. However, we feel less compassion as the number of victims grows. Are we incapable of feeling compassion for large groups of people who suffer a tragedy, such as an earthquake or the recent Sri Lanka Easter bombings? Of course not, but the truth is we aren't as compassionate as we'd like to believe, because of a paradox of large numbers. Why is this?
Yet even after hundreds of centuries of evolution, when tragedy strikes beyond our community, our compassion wanes as the number of displaced, injured, and dead mounts.
Some back story
A Dunbar Correlation
Professor Dunbar's response:
Friendship, kinship and limitations
Gray matter matters
There is an eclectic list of reasons why compassion may collapse, irrespective of sheer numbers:
In the end
The controversial herbicide is everywhere, apparently.
- A jury on August 2018 awarded a non-Hodgkin's lymphoma victim $289 million in Roundup damages.
- Bayer/Monsanto says Roundup is totally safe. Others disagree.
- There are 2 different approaches to governing free speech on college campuses.
- One is a morality/order approach. The other is a bottom-up approach.
- Emily Chamlee-Wright says there are many benefits to having no one central authority on what is appropriate speech.
SMARTER FASTER trademarks owned by The Big Think, Inc. All rights reserved.