99% match: Forensic anthropologists may have solved the Amelia Earhart mystery

Looks like we finally know some answers that they didn't in 1940.

Just three years after Amelia Earhart and her navigator Fred Noonan disappeared in 1937, a forensic anthropologist name D. W. Hoodless studied some bones found off the island of Nikumaroro. He concluded they were from a male, so they weren’t hers; ever since then, the mystery has deepened and fascinated school children and adults alike for generations.

But now, Richard Jantz, a modern forensic anthropologist, has restudied those bones, and he is about as certain as anyone can be that they’re Earhart’s.

The red pin shows the location of the island Nikumaroro, part of the Phoenix Islands, Kiribati, in the western Pacific Ocean. This is where Amelia Earhart's bones are now believed to have been found.

What makes him so sure?

Simple: The field has come a long way since 1940—far enough that certainty is all but assured by using modern techniques. This, in combination with some of the artifacts found on Nikumaroro, might just seal the case for good. 

The researchers who worked with Jantz used modern quantitative techniques, including a program known as Fordisc, which simulates and estimates sex, ancestry, and stature from skeletal measurements. Today, it’s used by nearly every board-certified forensic anthropologist in the world.

Jantz concluded: "This analysis reveals that Earhart is more similar to the Nikumaroro bones than 99% of individuals in a large reference sample. This strongly supports the conclusion that the Nikumaroro bones belonged to Amelia Earhart.”

But after using the Fordisc software he went even further, studying bone lengths; using old photographs with scalable, measurable items in them he could calculate Earhart’s humerus and radius lengths and compare. He also enlisted an historical seamstress to measure clothing that Earhart wore to gauge bone lengths. 

According to the paper, casting aspersions on the Hoodless conclusions from 1940 is not their intention. ”Forensic anthropology was not well developed in the early 20th century. There are many examples of erroneous assessments by anthropologists of the period. We can agree that Hoodless may have done as well as most analysts of the time could have done, but this does not mean his analysis was correct."

LinkedIn meets Tinder in this mindful networking app

Swipe right to make the connections that could change your career.

Getty Images
Swipe right. Match. Meet over coffee or set up a call.

No, we aren't talking about Tinder. Introducing Shapr, a free app that helps people with synergistic professional goals and skill sets easily meet and collaborate.

Keep reading Show less

Brain study finds circuits that may help you keep your cool

Research by neuroscientists at MIT's Picower Institute for Learning and Memory helps explain how the brain regulates arousal.

Photo by CHARLY TRIBALLEAU / AFP/ Getty Images
Mind & Brain

MIT News

The big day has come: You are taking your road test to get your driver's license. As you start your mom's car with a stern-faced evaluator in the passenger seat, you know you'll need to be alert but not so excited that you make mistakes. Even if you are simultaneously sleep-deprived and full of nervous energy, you need your brain to moderate your level of arousal so that you do your best.

Keep reading Show less

34 years ago, a KGB defector chillingly predicted modern America

A disturbing interview given by a KGB defector in 1984 describes America of today and outlines four stages of mass brainwashing used by the KGB.

Politics & Current Affairs
  • Bezmenov described this process as "a great brainwashing" which has four basic stages.
  • The first stage is called "demoralization" which takes from 15 to 20 years to achieve.
  • According to the former KGB agent, that is the minimum number of years it takes to re-educate one generation of students that is normally exposed to the ideology of its country.
Keep reading Show less

How pharmaceutical companies game the patent system

When these companies compete, in the current system, the people lose.

Top Video Splash
  • When a company reaches the top of the ladder, they typically kick it away so that others cannot climb up on it. The aim? So that another company can't compete.
  • When this happens in the pharmaceutical world, certain companies stay at the top of the ladder, through broadly-protected patents, at the cost of everyday people benefitting from increased competition.
  • Since companies have worked out how to legally game the system, Amin argues we need to get rid of this "one size fits all" system, which treats product innovation — "tweaks" — the same as product invention.