Hot dogs vs. hamburgers: which is the healthier choice?
Are hot dogs or hamburgers the healthier option? It's a question that has plagued many a summer barbecue guest.
Are hot dogs or hamburgers the healthier option? It's a question that has plagued many a summer barbeque guest, and while neither is a nutritional powerhouse, chances are you'll want to stick with the hamburger over the hot dog.
Summer barbeque season is upon us, but this year, you've decided to eat better and are foregoing the grill in favor of curried chicken salad tossed in a zesty yogurt dressing. Good for you! But we all know the day is coming when you'll be invited to a barbeque, and the only salads available will be either macaroni or potato. You're hungry, you don't want to be rude, and now you've got a choice to make: the hot dog or the hamburger?
Truth is, neither one is a nutritional powerhouse when compared to your dynamite curry chicken salad, but there can be a superior choice depending on your health needs and focus. Here's how they stack up against one another.
Hot dogs, the healthy alternative
If you are worried about weight — either losing it or keeping it off — a hot dog may be your best choice. Beef hot dogs have fewer calories than hamburgers, typically in the 150 range. Pop it in an enriched white hot dog bun and add a serving-sized dollop of ketchup, mustard, and relish, and you can bump up your caloric intake to about 450.
Of course, you can make your hot dog healthier by pairing it with a whole wheat bun and fresh toppings, or choose leaner meats like chicken or turkey, but we're going with standard barbeque fare here.
By contrast, a hamburger with a bun weights in at roughly 600 calories before toppings. With toppings and cheese, you are looking at about half your daily caloric intake before you even consider a bite of potato salad you've been eyeing.
Hot dogs are the clear victor this round.
Except when they aren't
However, there are significant nutritional downsides to hot dogs. For starters, they are chockablock with sodium; the average beef frank includes a staggering 450 mg. The American Heart Association recommends no more than 2,300 mg of sodium per day for adults, so a single dog will put you in at roughly 20 percent that limit before toppings. If you're a fan of sauerkraut on your dog, you'll be closer to half that sodium intake.
Hot dogs are full of nitrates, too. Nitrates are salts added as preservatives to hot dogs and other cured meats, such as bacon and sausage. They are also a carcinogenic. According to the International Agency for Research on Cancer, processed meats are classified as carcinogenic to humans “based on sufficient evidence" that consumptions “causes colorectal cancer." Red meat, like hamburger, is only a probable carcinogenic, based on limited evidence.
As Mariana Stern, a cancer epidemiologist at the University of Southern California told Time, this is true whether the nitrates are synthetic or a natural nitrate like celery juice. “Regardless of where the nitrates come from," she said, “they can be converted by oral bacteria into nitrites, which in turn can react in the stomach … to form N-Nitroso compounds, which are well-established cancer-causing agents."
Finally, hot dogs are small and not incredibly filling. The chances an average adult will eat just one are about as slim as the dog itself.
Hamburgers aren't out of the fight yet. While they lost the calorie round, hamburgers pack way more nutrition into their patties than hot dogs. Ground beef has more protein, more iron, more zinc, and far less sodium. It also contains vitamin B12 and selenium (an antioxidant).
They typically come with healthier, fresher topping options, such fresh lettuce, tomatoes, and onions, and if your hosts chose lean ground beef, you'll get all of these benefits plus less fat.
While you will certainly consume a lot more calories per burger, you'll more efficiently curb your hunger thanks to that additional protein. Considering all this... it is hamburgers that are clearly the healthier option.
But hamburgers don't get a nutritional pass. Because red meats are high in saturated fat, they have been linked to an increased risk of heart disease and high blood cholesterol. Barbequing red meat only exacerbates the concerns, because cooking such meat at high temperatures adds carcinogenic compounds.
You can lessen exposure to these compounds by choosing lean meats, not overcooking it, marinating it, and turning it frequently. You should also clean the grill frequently and thoroughly to remove those carcinogens from future cookouts.
Of course, whether or not you have to worry about such health warnings will depend on your overall diet. The occasional hot dog or hamburger here or there won't harm you or seriously increase your risk of cancer. In the Time article, Stern added that antioxidants can halt the conversion to cancer establishing agents and that studies show “processed meats might be more harmful in people with diets that are overall low in antioxidants." Similarly, health problems crop up in people who eat red meats to the exclusion of fruits, vegetables, and whole grains.
So, whichever you choose, enjoy it. Just make sure to follow it up with a leafy green salad for dinner that night.
What would happen if you tripled the US population? Join Matthew Yglesias and Charles Duhigg at 1pm ET on Monday, September 28.
The idea of 'absolute time' is an illusion. Physics and subjective experience reveal why.
- Since Einstein posited his theory of general relativity, we've understood that gravity has the power to warp space and time.
- This "time dilation" effect occurs even at small levels.
- Outside of physics, we experience distortions in how we perceive time — sometimes to a startling extent.
Physics without time<p>In his book "The Order of Time," Italian theoretical physicist Carlo Rovelli suggests that our perception of time — our sense that time is forever flowing forward — could be a highly subjective projection. After all, when you look at reality on the smallest scale (using equations of quantum gravity, at least), time vanishes.</p><p style="margin-left: 20px;">"If I observe the microscopic state of things," writes Rovelli, "then the difference between past and future vanishes … in the elementary grammar of things, there is no distinction between 'cause' and 'effect.'"</p><p>So, why do we perceive time as flowing <em>forward</em>? Rovelli notes that, although time disappears on extremely small scales, we still obviously perceive events occur sequentially in reality. In other words, we observe entropy: Order changing into disorder; an egg cracking and getting scrambled.</p><p>Rovelli says key aspects of time are described by the second law of thermodynamics, which states that heat always passes from hot to cold. This is a one-way street. For example, an ice cube melts into a hot cup of tea, never the reverse. Rovelli suggests a similar phenomenon might explain why we're only able to perceive the past and not the future.</p><p style="margin-left: 20px;">"Any time the future is definitely distinguishable from the past, there is something like heat involved," Rovelli wrote for the <a href="https://www.ft.com/content/ce6ef7b8-429a-11e8-93cf-67ac3a6482fd" target="_blank"><em>Financial Times</em></a>. "Thermodynamics traces the direction of time to something called the 'low entropy of the past', a still mysterious phenomenon on which discussions rage."</p>
The strange subjectivity of time<p>Time moves differently atop a mountain than it does on a beach. But you don't need to travel any distance at all to experience strange distortions in your perception of time. In moments of life-or-death fear, for example, your brain would release large amounts of adrenaline, which would speed up your internal clock, causing you to perceive the outside world as moving slowly.<br></p><p>Another common distortion occurs when we focus our attention in particular ways.</p><p style="margin-left: 20px;">"If you're thinking about how time is <em>currently</em> passing by, the biggest factor influencing your time perception is attention," Aaron Sackett, associate professor of marketing at the University of St. Thomas, told <em><a href="https://gizmodo.com/why-does-time-slow-down-and-speed-up-1840133782" target="_blank">Gizmodo</a></em>.<em> "</em>The more attention you give to the passage of time, the slower it tends to go. As you become distracted from time's passing—perhaps by something interesting happening nearby, or a good daydreaming session—you're more likely to lose track of time, giving you the feeling that it's slipping by more quickly than before. "Time flies when you're having fun," they say, but really, it's more like "time flies when you're thinking about other things." That's why time will also often fly by when you're definitely <em>not</em> having fun—like when you're having a heated argument or are terrified about an upcoming presentation."</p><p>One of the most mysterious ways people experience time-perception distortions is through psychedelic drugs. In an interview with <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/books/2018/apr/14/carlo-rovelli-exploding-commonsense-notions-order-of-time-interview" target="_blank"><em>The Guardian</em></a>, Rovelli described a time he experimented with LSD.</p><p style="margin-left: 20px;">"It was an extraordinarily strong experience that touched me also intellectually," he said. "Among the strange phenomena was the sense of time stopping. Things were happening in my mind but the clock was not going ahead; the flow of time was not passing any more. It was a total subversion of the structure of reality."<br></p><p>It seems few scientists or philosophers believe time is completely an illusion.</p><p style="margin-left: 20px;">"What we call <em>time</em> is a rich, stratified concept; it has many layers," Rovelli told <em><a href="https://physicstoday.scitation.org/do/10.1063/PT.6.4.20190219a/full/" target="_blank">Physics Today</a>.</em> "Some of time's layers apply only at limited scales within limited domains. This does not make them illusions."</p>What <em>is</em> an illusion is the idea that time flows at an absolute rate. The river of time might be flowing forever forward, but it moves at different speeds, between people, and even within your own mind.
Dominique Crenn, the only female chef in America with three Michelin stars, joins Big Think Live.
Having been exposed to mavericks in the French culinary world at a young age, three-star Michelin chef Dominique Crenn made it her mission to cook in a way that is not only delicious and elegant, but also expressive, memorable, and true to her experience.
Controversial physics theory says reality around us behaves like a computer neural network.
- Physicist proposes that the universe behaves like an artificial neural network.
- The scientist's new paper seeks to reconcile classical physics and quantum mechanics.
- The theory claims that natural selection produces both atoms and "observers".
Vanchurin interview:<span style="display:block;position:relative;padding-top:56.25%;" class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="539759cbfd8fcd5b6ebf14a3b597b3f9"><iframe type="lazy-iframe" data-runner-src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/bmyRy2-UhEE?rel=0" width="100%" height="auto" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" style="position:absolute;top:0;left:0;width:100%;height:100%;"></iframe></span>
Vanchurin on “Hidden Phenomena”:<span style="display:block;position:relative;padding-top:56.25%;" class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="18886ffd5e5840bb19d4494212f88d82"><iframe type="lazy-iframe" data-runner-src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/2NDVdNwsHCo?rel=0" width="100%" height="auto" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" style="position:absolute;top:0;left:0;width:100%;height:100%;"></iframe></span>Vitaly Vanchurin speaking at the 6th International FQXi Conference, "Mind Matters: Intelligence and Agency in the Physical World." The Foundational Questions...
43% of people think they can get a sense of someone's personality by their picture.
If you've used a dating app, you'll know the importance of choosing good profile pics.
Quarantine rule breakers in 17th-century Italy partied all night – and some clergy condemned the feasting
17th-century outbreaks of plague in Italy reveal both tensions between religious and public health authorities.