Without Political Clout Women Lose Ground in High Tech
There’s no doubt that encouraging girls to take STEM courses is imperative to their higher representation as women in those fields. But a recent Catalyst study of 6,000 MBA graduates from the U.S., Canada, Europe and Asia indicates that it will take more to increase the number of women in high tech. Women are far less likely to start their careers in these jobs and leave them more quickly than men. Seventy-five percent of women in the study reported feeling like outsiders as compared to 17% of men.
A certain amount of that feeling is to be expected whenever women work their way into predominantly male fields. The research findings, however, indicate a much larger problem than just being the new kid on the block. The study subjects also reported a lack of role models and vague criteria for evaluation as main barriers.
Taken together these are largely political obstacles. Vague and shifting criteria have long been useful ways to keep unwanted employees from thriving in workplace cultures that lack transparency. Subliminal and overt signs of not being welcome keep the insiders in and the outsiders out, creating feelings of exclusion. And it’s difficult to find role models when so few women stay in high tech and men are rarely rewarded for serving in that capacity.
Add to this unhealthy combination two additional challenges: (1) as indicated by a 2013 study reported by the Harvard Business Review, women generally show greater disdain than men for workplace politics, and (2) such disdain does not incline them to learn how to counteract and, as necessary, work within cultures common in high tech industries.
It’s imperative that those of us encouraging young women to enter high tech fields also emphasize the need to arm them with a keen understanding of workplace politics – mild to intense – likely to block their way. For forward thinking companies this is also to their advantage.
It’s one thing to achieve high-level of competence in preparation to enter any field and quite another to function effectively within a dismissive and/or antagonistic culture.
Kathleen also blogs on politics and influence here.
photo: Sergey Nivens/shutterstock.com
Upstreamism advocate Rishi Manchanda calls us to understand health not as a "personal responsibility" but a "common good."
- Upstreamism tasks health care professionals to combat unhealthy social and cultural influences that exist outside — or upstream — of medical facilities.
- Patients from low-income neighborhoods are most at risk of negative health impacts.
- Thankfully, health care professionals are not alone. Upstreamism is increasingly part of our cultural consciousness.
A plan to forgive almost a trillion dollars in debt would solve the student loan debt crisis, but can it work?
- Sen. Elizabeth Warren has just proposed a bold education reform plan that would forgive billions in student debt.
- The plan would forgive the debt held by more than 30 million Americans.
- The debt forgiveness program is one part of a larger program to make higher education more accessible.
America isn't immune to attempts to remove books from libraries and schools, here are ten frequent targets and why you ought to go check them out.
- Even in America, books are frequently challenged and removed from schools and public libraries.
- Every year, the American Library Association puts on Banned Books Week to draw attention to this fact.
- Some of the books they include on their list of most frequently challenged are some of the greatest, most beloved, and entertaining books there are.
In most states, LGBTQ Americans have no legal protections against discrimination in the workplace.
- The Supreme Court will decide whether the Civil Rights Act of 1964 also applies to gay and transgender people.
- The court, which currently has a probable conservative majority, will likely decide on the cases in 2020.
- Only 21 states and the District of Columbia have passed laws effectively extending the Civil Rights of 1964 to gay and transgender people.
SMARTER FASTER trademarks owned by The Big Think, Inc. All rights reserved.