Mark Zuckerberg: A "Dislike" Button Would Not Be Socially Valuable

The Facebook CEO spoke at a town hall style Q&A and touched on subjects such as his company's role in the community, recent public relations hiccups, and how parents should monitor social media use.

Is there a more fascinating business leader in the world today than Mark Zuckerberg? How many folks can say they've amassed over $33 billion in net worth, been the subject of a major Hollywood film, and helped create the planet's most popular social media platform... all before turning 31? And how many public figures could pull off hosting a town hall Q&A like Zuckerberg and his team have done twice in the past few months?

Not many.

The Facebook CEO addressed questions at the most recent meeting that ranged from serious (like the company's checkered past with regard to user privacy) to so silly they may as well have been asked by CNN's John King during a presidential debate. If, by the way, you wanted to know Zuckerberg's favorite pizza topping, it's apparently fried chicken.

When asked about the prospect of Facebook adding a "dislike" button beneath posts, Zuckerberg made an interesting case for discluding negativity. The following quote is from NBC News' Devin Coldeway's write-up of the event:

"'Some people have asked for a dislike button because they want to be able to say 'that thing isn't good,' and we're not going to do that... I don't think that's socially very valuable, or great for the community.'"

On the "like" button:

"'[It] is a powerful way to sympathize or empathize with someone. I think giving people the power to do that in more ways with more emotions would be powerful, but we have to figure out the right way to do it.'"

The closest thing I can think of to a "dislike" button is the Reddit downvote, which is understood (though not always utilized) as a way to bury responses not relevant to the conversation at hand. Zuckerberg's hard stance against negativity opens up the conversation of whether a "dislike" button would make Facebook toxic. I think it would. What's your take?

Click the link below to learn more about Zuckerberg's thoughts on his company's role in the community, recent public relations hiccups, and how parents should monitor social media use.

Read more at Today

Photo credit: Frederic Legrand - COMEO / Shutterstock

'Upstreamism': Your zip code affects your health as much as genetics

Upstreamism advocate Rishi Manchanda calls us to understand health not as a "personal responsibility" but a "common good."

Sponsored by Northwell Health
  • Upstreamism tasks health care professionals to combat unhealthy social and cultural influences that exist outside — or upstream — of medical facilities.
  • Patients from low-income neighborhoods are most at risk of negative health impacts.
  • Thankfully, health care professionals are not alone. Upstreamism is increasingly part of our cultural consciousness.
Keep reading Show less

In U.S. first, drug company faces criminal charges for distributing opioids

It marks a major shift in the government's battle against the opioid crisis.

George Frey/Bloomberg via Getty Images
Politics & Current Affairs
  • The nation's sixth-largest drug distributor is facing criminal charges related to failing to report suspicious drug orders, among other things.
  • It marks the first time a drug company has faced criminal charges for distributing opioids.
  • Since 1997, nearly 222,000 Americans have died from prescription opioids, partly thanks to unethical doctors who abuse the system.
Keep reading Show less

Scientists create a "lifelike" material that has metabolism and can self-reproduce

An innovation may lead to lifelike evolving machines.

Shogo Hamada/Cornell University
Surprising Science
  • Scientists at Cornell University devise a material with 3 key traits of life.
  • The goal for the researchers is not to create life but lifelike machines.
  • The researchers were able to program metabolism into the material's DNA.
Keep reading Show less

Calling out Cersei Lannister: Elizabeth Warren reviews Game of Thrones

The real Game of Thrones might be who best leverages the hit HBO show to shape political narratives.

Photo credit: Mario Tama / Getty Images
Politics & Current Affairs
  • Sen. Elizabeth Warren argues that Game of Thrones is primarily about women in her review of the wildly popular HBO show.
  • Warren also touches on other parallels between the show and our modern world, such as inequality, political favoritism of the elite, and the dire impact of different leadership styles on the lives of the people.
  • Her review serves as another example of using Game of Thrones as a political analogy and a tool for framing political narratives.
Keep reading Show less