Fitness Devices Won't Be Taken Seriously By Physicians without FDA Approval
Medicine could benefit from what technology has to offer, so why aren't fitness bands being used by physicians? Doctors say that without FDA regulation to guarantee accuracy, there's no way these device will be taken seriously.
Fitness trackers have made it into the consumer space, but they've been struggling to make an impression in the doctor's office. Indeed, medicine could benefit from what technology has to offer, so why aren't fitness bands being used by physicians? Amy Standen from NPR sat down with a few doctors to find out the answer.
Dr. Paul Abramson is no stranger to fitness wearables, but the proliferation of these devices gives him pause. He confesses that the amount of data his patients bring him—pages and pages of daily heart-rate levels, sleep measurements, and steps taken--is overwhelming. There may be a wealth of data, but trying to extract meaning from so many data points isn't feasible for one physician, he said in an interview with Standen.
Fitness devices have been trying to insert themselves in the doctors office—it's the next logical step. Dr. Michael Blum, a cardiologist at the University of California, says he gets pitched by entrepreneurs on a near-daily basis.
"Their perspective is, 'You old doctors have kept things the same as they are for 50 years. We've got new technology and it's going to disrupt health care.'"
But doctors, like Blum, are wary to take these devices in without the FDA's approval. Studies need to be conducted on a product's accuracy and ability to provide safe, meaningful information to the medical industry. So, without further research these gadgets are nothing more than trendy accessories to doctors.
It's important to note, though, that the FDA refers to these fitness wearables as “low-risk devices.” Things that are meant for personal wellness and stress management, and the FDA has no intention of regulating them—only diagnostic devices meant to treat and manage disease.
In order for fitness devices to be taken seriously by the medical industry, companies are going to have to take extra steps to ensure patient confidentiality and accuracy. It means taking part in the conversation through research. As of now, fitness wearables are still want to dabble in the consumer market, helping those who can afford one track their steps, heart-rate, and sleep patterns. But if fitness wearables really want to make an impression in the health industry, companies will have to brush up on FDA and HIPAA standards. However, that road would mean giving up on data collection (and the possibly of reselling that information) and building encryption into their systems and devices.
Sleep tracking and heart-rate analysis aren't innovations. What could be is a fitness tracker that releases after its been through clinical trials and complies with FDA and HIPAA standards. But it's a lot of work that young start-ups can't afford or don't want to waste time doing.
Read more at NPR
Photo Credit: Shutterstock
Upstreamism advocate Rishi Manchanda calls us to understand health not as a "personal responsibility" but a "common good."
- Upstreamism tasks health care professionals to combat unhealthy social and cultural influences that exist outside — or upstream — of medical facilities.
- Patients from low-income neighborhoods are most at risk of negative health impacts.
- Thankfully, health care professionals are not alone. Upstreamism is increasingly part of our cultural consciousness.
The Bajau people's nomadic lifestyle has given them remarkable adaptions, enabling them to stay underwater for unbelievable periods of time. Their lifestyle, however, is quickly disappearing.
- The Bajau people travel in small flotillas throughout the Phillipines, Malaysia, and Indonesia, hunting fish underwater for food.
- Over the years, practicing this lifestyle has given the Bajau unique adaptations to swimming underwater. Many find it straightforward to dive up to 13 minutes 200 feet below the surface of the ocean.
- Unfortunately, many disparate factors are erasing the traditional Bajau way of life.
We explore the history of blood types and how they are classified to find out what makes the Rh-null type important to science and dangerous for those who live with it.
- Fewer than 50 people worldwide have 'golden blood' — or Rh-null.
- Blood is considered Rh-null if it lacks all of the 61 possible antigens in the Rh system.
- It's also very dangerous to live with this blood type, as so few people have it.
An innovation may lead to lifelike evolving machines.
- Scientists at Cornell University devise a material with 3 key traits of life.
- The goal for the researchers is not to create life but lifelike machines.
- The researchers were able to program metabolism into the material's DNA.
SMARTER FASTER trademarks owned by The Big Think, Inc. All rights reserved.