College Professors Told to Fork Over Email Exchanges with Monsanto

In an unprecedented use of Freedom of Information laws, an anti-GMO group wants to read the emails of forty university professors with professional associations to biotechnology firms.

The politicking of the biotechnology industry seems to have gone a little too far. 


Now, an anti-GMO group is requesting to read the professional emails of 40 university professors with alleged ties to biotech firms such as Monsanto.

Called US Right to Know, the group alleges that a select group of university professors are actively promoting biotechnology products like genetically modified crops in exchange for financial compensation.

There are no briefcases of cash here, but rather generous research grants given to outspoken proponents of GMO foods. Kevin Folta, a plant scientist at the University of Florida in Gainesville, for example, received an unrestricted $25,000 research grant from Monsanto last year.


It's not just large grants, however, that cause concern among anti-GMO groups like US Right to Know. Biotechnology companies are given to hiring ambitious public relations firms like Ketchum of New York, which manages the website GMO Answers.

While appearing as a neutral source for information on GMO crops, GMO Answers is managed by Ketchum and to create a well-credentialed sited, Ketchum reached out to professors friendly to the GMO industry to respond to queries posted by online users.

Ketchum even went so far as to draft responses for certain academics, including Folta, telling him it's important that his responses be "authentic" and encouraging him to alter the scripted answers to suit his preference.

US Right to Know says that when professors on the public doll are indirectly working for private companies with private interests, the public has a right to know. Hence the request to sift through the professors' email.

At least one institution, the University of Nebraska, has refused to hand over the emails requested by the anti-GMO group, which is filing Freedom of Information briefs in state courts.

Dr. Lee M. Silver, professor of molecular biology at Princeton University, gives essential context to the GMO debate, explaining the complications of defending natural foods by prioritizing natural products.


Read more at Nature.

Photo credit: Bloomberg / Contributor

3D printing might save your life one day. It's transforming medicine and health care.

What can 3D printing do for medicine? The "sky is the limit," says Northwell Health researcher Dr. Todd Goldstein.

Northwell Health
Sponsored by Northwell Health
  • Medical professionals are currently using 3D printers to create prosthetics and patient-specific organ models that doctors can use to prepare for surgery.
  • Eventually, scientists hope to print patient-specific organs that can be transplanted safely into the human body.
  • Northwell Health, New York State's largest health care provider, is pioneering 3D printing in medicine in three key ways.
Keep reading Show less
Big Think Edge
  • "I consider that a man's brain originally is like a little empty attic, and you have to stock it with such furniture as you choose," Sherlock Holmes famously remarked.
  • In this lesson, Maria Konnikova, author of Mastermind: How to think like Sherlock Holmes, teaches you how to optimize memory, Holmes style.
  • The goal is to expand one's limited "brain attic," so that what used to be a small space can suddenly become much larger because we are using the space more efficiently.

Active ingredient in Roundup found in 95% of studied beers and wines

The controversial herbicide is everywhere, apparently.

(MsMaria/Shutterstock)
Surprising Science
  • U.S. PIRG tested 20 beers and wines, including organics, and found Roundup's active ingredient in almost all of them.
  • A jury on August 2018 awarded a non-Hodgkin's lymphoma victim $289 million in Roundup damages.
  • Bayer/Monsanto says Roundup is totally safe. Others disagree.
Keep reading Show less
Big Think Edge
  • Our ability to behave rationally depends not just on our ability to use the facts, but on our ability to give those facts meaning. To be rational, we need both facts and feelings. We need to be subjective.
  • In this lesson, risk communication expert David Ropeik teaches you how human rationality influences our perception of risk.
  • By the end of it, you'll understand the pitfalls of your subjective risk perception system so that you can avoid these traps in the future.