Darwin's Bad Break — How His Name Is Misused
Charles Darwin probably wouldn't like what his name now means. He called any "Darwinian" human, having no trace of team loyalty, "an unnatural monster."
1. “Darwin was no Darwinian,” declared Martin Luther King Jr. He’s right, and it’s a bad break for Charles Darwin that his name is used to distort his own ideas about humans.
2. Ross Douthat says that Breaking Bad illustrated the clear “Darwinian logic” of an older cruel “tribal” code (that’s “neither liberal nor Judeo-Christian”). Douthat believes a “Darwinian” code “lies percolating just below the surface of every human heart,” but that's empirically inaccurate.
3. Breaking Bad‘s moral complexities remind us that stories are thought experiments in social rules that often yield multiple interpretations (“the human mind is a story processor, not a logic processor”). Science’s stories can also have multiple interpretations, e.g., evolution isn’t quite as simple as “red in tooth and claw” competition.
4. Note, calling morals social-rules sidesteps old barriers, surely social-rules are scientifically studiable.
5. Here’s Darwin’s clear logic: "The moral sense perhaps affords the best ... distinction between man and the lower animals ... [and our] social instincts, the prime principle of man’s moral constitution ... naturally lead to the golden rule, do unto others as you would have them do unto you." Not so “Darwinian.” Darwin understood we are, by nature, self-deficient, utterly interdependent.
6. One specious origin of what’s now called “Darwinian” is Herbert Spencer, coiner of “survival of the fittest.” Another descends to us via Dawkinsian selfish-genery, but Richard Dawkins' logic is flawed — every “selfish” gene must also cooperate. The mix is key.
7. Studying actual “tribal” codes shows all extant hunter-gatherers limit group-threatening behaviors, including harmful competition (Christopher Boehm). Team survival has shaped our evolution (and social-rule processors) for 10,000 generations.
8. Social rules could be classified as of two types: Those that prevent group-damaging behaviours. And those that don’t. Guess which survive longer?
9. Darwin seemingly knew better than today’s “Darwinians” that though we evolved like other species, we’re also different. Teamwork is humanity’s signature adaption (David Sloan Wilson). We are the giraffes of cooperation—>uniquely extended teamwork traits.
11. Evolution’s stories are prone to narrative selection. Rorschach readings enabled Karl Marx to see Darwin’s work as a scientific basis for class struggle, and Bertrand Russell felt evolution was inspired by economic ideas, favoring “animals that most resembled successful capitalists."
12. Economists often see markets as competitive “Darwinian” selectors. But they ignore how competition in nature regularly creates catastrophe and waste. As it can in markets (which can be “as dumb as trees”). Our evolved capacities for reason, foresight, and teamwork could help us avoid predictably bad competitive outcomes.
13. This aspect of nature has crystal-clear methods. Her logic tends to eliminate all that damages what it depends on. We’d better get stories about this percolating into every human heart and head.
14. Darwin called any “Darwinian” human having no trace of team loyalty “an unnatural monster.”
Illustration by Julia Suits, The New Yorker Cartoonist & author of The Extraordinary Catalog of Peculiar Inventions
Swipe right to make the connections that could change your career.
Swipe right. Match. Meet over coffee or set up a call.
No, we aren't talking about Tinder. Introducing Shapr, a free app that helps people with synergistic professional goals and skill sets easily meet and collaborate.
A completely unexpected discovery beneath the ice.
- Scientists find remains of a tardigrade and crustaceans in a deep, frozen Antarctic lake.
- The creatures' origin is unknown, and further study is ongoing.
- Biology speaks up about Antarctica's history.
Bushier eyebrows are associated with higher levels of narcissism, according to new research.
- Science has provided an excellent clue for identifying the narcissists among us.
- Eyebrows are crucial to recognizing identities.
- The study provides insight into how we process faces and our latent ability to detect toxic people.
It's one factor that can help explain the religiosity gap.
- Sociologists have long observed a gap between the religiosity of men and women.
- A recent study used data from several national surveys to compare religiosity, risk-taking preferences and demographic information among more than 20,000 American adolescents.
- The results suggest that risk-taking preferences might partly explain the gender differences in religiosity.
SMARTER FASTER trademarks owned by The Big Think, Inc. All rights reserved.