Will Church and State Ever Truly Be Separate?
The GOP wants to repeal the Johnson Amendment, once again uniting church and state.
With so much of our attention being paid to one candidate’s Twitter account, many other stories that would normally receive notice have slipped through the cracks. This includes the announcement of the GOP platform, in which Republicans pontificated on the most pressing issues facing America today.
It opens, as expected from any party, with the idea that America is the most blessed nation that Earth has ever witnessed, and it therefore requires extensive resources to fight perpetual scourges—like pornography. Culture wars dominate—for example, marriage must remain “between one man and one woman.” One of the more frightening modifications involves repealing a half-century old tax law that prohibits religious institutions from organizing politically, otherwise known as the Johnson Amendment.
In 1954 Senator Lyndon B Johnson put forward this bill to ensure that tax-exempt organizations cannot endorse political candidates. While this also means nonprofit companies, the GOP slid this item into the section on Religious Liberty. The only nonprofit citations were for religious universities and organizations.
The specific passage begins by parsing pro-religion sentiments from George Washington and Thomas Jefferson, immediately pivoting to claim that religion—well, let’s be clear: Christianity—is under attack:
Ongoing attempts to compel individuals, businesses, and institutions of faith to transgress their beliefs are part of a misguided effort to undermine religion and drive it from the public square.
Somehow this translates as charitable religious organizations being unable to receive governmental grants and contracts due to a liberal Democratic agenda to do away with faith altogether. Certain politicians are apparently threatening religious universities with ‘massive fines’ while seeking to ‘control their personnel decisions.’ Ultimately this will result in a loss of tax-exempt status if the faithful don’t step up their game. The suspension of logic in this singular paragraph, line by line, is astounding. It ends:
Republicans believe the federal government, specifically the IRS, is constitutionally prohibited from policing or censoring speech based on religious convictions or beliefs, and therefore we urge the repeal of the Johnson Amendment.
From there it pivots to imply religious institutions that refuse to marry members of the LBGT community are truly oppressed, as are those choosing to celebrate our nation’s ‘Judeo-Christian heritage.’ School prayer is slipped in, as are businesses that decide not to serve gay customers.
Even in all this noise the repeal of the Johnson Amendment remains the most frightening prospect. As I wrote on this site some time ago, taxing churches would result in a gain of $71 billion in revenue every year. While Johnson specifically cites the IRS in overseeing nonprofit and religious organizations that are politically organizing, this is largely overlooked—religious leaders regularly endorse without actually endorsing. And then some just go ahead and endorse, using their pulpit to influence congregations across the country.
For example, Liberty University’s president, Jerry Falwell Jr, had no problem making an endorsement, even though his school is nonprofit and religious. Megachurch leader Robert Jeffress chimed in, as did fellow megachurch titan John Hagee. At the moment none of these churches appear to be in any danger of losing their tax-exempt status. This is not limited to the GOP—church leaders support Democratic candidates as well. It just so happens that during this election cycle they have not been as loud about it.
Repealing the Johnson Amendment would only make more blatant what is already occurring in the open. To confuse individual liberties with so-called religious liberties is to misunderstand (or simply ignore) the freedoms guaranteed to us. The agenda proposed here has nothing to do with freedom; it’s about mobilizing a particular subset of the American population for votes, plain and simple.
Using houses of worship for political purposes is in no way new, and will continue, mostly unregulated, for the foreseeable future. Dismantling the one protection citizens have against the marriage of church and state—incredibly, often between men and men—is one of the most unconstitutional items on the menu. Perhaps Khizr Khan needs to purchase more pocket Constitutions to hand out to members of Congress. They might consider skimming over it.
Derek Beres is working on his new book, Whole Motion: Training Your Brain and Body For Optimal Health (Carrel/Skyhorse, Spring 2017). He is based in Los Angeles. Stay in touch @derekberes.
Here's the science of black holes, from supermassive monsters to ones the size of ping-pong balls.
- There's more than one way to make a black hole, says NASA's Michelle Thaller. They're not always formed from dead stars. For example, there are teeny tiny black holes all around us, the result of high-energy cosmic rays slamming into our atmosphere with enough force to cram matter together so densely that no light can escape.
- CERN is trying to create artificial black holes right now, but don't worry, it's not dangerous. Scientists there are attempting to smash two particles together with such intensity that it creates a black hole that would live for just a millionth of a second.
- Thaller uses a brilliant analogy involving a rubber sheet, a marble, and an elephant to explain why different black holes have varying densities. Watch and learn!
- Bonus fact: If the Earth became a black hole, it would be crushed to the size of a ping-pong ball.
Military recruits are supposed to be assessed to see whether they're fit for service. What happens when they're not?
- During the Vietnam War, Robert McNamara began a program called Project 100,000.
- The program brought over 300,000 men to Vietnam who failed to meet minimum criteria for military service, both physically and mentally.
- Project 100,000 recruits were killed in disproportionate numbers and fared worse after their military service than their civilian peers, making the program one of the biggest—and possibly cruelest—mistakes of the Vietnam War.
In a breakthrough for nuclear fusion research, scientists at China's Experimental Advanced Superconducting Tokamak (EAST) reactor have produced temperatures necessary for nuclear fusion on Earth.
- The EAST reactor was able to heat hydrogen to temperatures exceeding 100 million degrees Celsius.
- Nuclear fusion could someday provide the planet with a virtually limitless supply of clean energy.
- Still, scientists have many other obstacles to pass before fusion technology becomes a viable energy source.
SMARTER FASTER trademarks owned by The Big Think, Inc. All rights reserved.