Can We Quit It With the "Right Brain, Left Brain" Stuff Already?!
Kayt is a member of the American Society of Journalists and Authors (ASJA), the Author's Guild and the National Association of Science Writers (NASW). She has recently returned to the United States after living abroad for six years and has just published her first book, DIRTY MINDS: HOW OUR BRAINS INFLUENCE LOVE, SEX AND RELATIONSHIPS, an exploration of the neurobiology of love (Free Press, 2012).
Kayt Sukel's writing credits include personal essays in the Washington Post, American Baby, the Bark, USAToday, Literary Mama and the Christian Science Monitor as well as articles on a variety of subjects for the Atlantic Monthly, Parenting, Cerebrum, BrainWork and American Baby magazines. She blogs regularly about traveling on the Lowell Thomas Travel Journalism Award winning travel blog, Travel Savvy Mom; and science, love and life at the Houston Chronicle's Hearts and Minds blog.
You can often find her oversharing on Twitter as @kaytsukel.
My eighth grade art teacher was the first to introduce me to the concept of "right-brain thinking."
He brought his copy of DRAWING FROM THE RIGHT SIDE OF THE BRAIN (at that time a new bestseller poised to change the face of education) into the classroom to share with us. And he used the ideas contained within to try and help us become better artists. From the get-go, he was a big believer in the idea that the right side of the brain housed our creativity--and by letting our right brains do the brunt of the work, we could become better artists. My greatest handicap in art, apparently, was being way too much of a left-brainer. (As an interesting aside, he is still talking about this book in educational workshops as of 2009).
Over the past 20 years, this "left brain/right brain" dichotomy has become part of American popular culture. And the idea has gone beyond explaining different learning/teaching styles. There is now a pervasive notion that the two hemispheres of the brain facilitate different kinds of thinking, different kinds of personalities. Left-brainers (like me) are logical, formulaic and very analytical. We're the types that look at the parts instead of the whole. Right-brainers, on the other hand, are more of your intellectual free spirits, using a more random, holistic and subjective learning style.
You see this idea heralded in teaching workshops, highlighted in news articles and bestselling books, and even splashed up on Facebook timelines (usually with fun, colorful graphics). You can take all manner of online quizzes to see just what side of the brain you most depend on in life, suggesting your particular reliance will explain who you are and how you interact with the world around you.
Right-brain/Left-brain is an easy cliche--and a bastardization of the science. Yet people are far too happy to accept the idea at face value and use it to generalize behavior in school, work and life.
Now, I'm not saying that individuals don't have different learning styles. They do, of course, and understanding that can help teachers design better lesson plans across subjects. But designating them as "left-brain" or "right-brain" doesn't make them any more valid.
The idea of left-brain/right-brain stems from research done by Roger Sperry and Mike Gazzaniga in the 1960's. The two looked at epileptic patients that had undergone a corpus callosumectomy, or a surgical procedure that severed the connections between the two hemispheres, to see how it influenced cognitive function and behavior. These are classic experiments, discussed in every undergraduate psychology class--and Sperry and Gazzaniga did show very interesting effects with language and images under strict experimental conditions.
But none of that work ever suggested that our abilities--math, verbal or otherwise, are limited to just a single hemisphere of the brain. They did not then and they do not now. In fact, neuroscience research makes a case for almost the exact opposite scenario. Function is not tied to an area--it's the product of a distributed network of cells spanning the brain across lobes and hemispheres. These circuits are shaped by a unique mix of biology and experience. Trying to explain something as complex as a learning style by highlighting a single side of the brain is an oversimplification at best. (Case in point, take the split-brain patient out of the laboratory, uncover the single eye or ear masked during the experimental paradigm, and you'll see someone navigating the world in a remarkably normal way).
Every few years, a new book or article plays up the idea of "left-brain" and "right-brain" thinking. And we are once again bombarded with the idea that one hemisphere of our brain colors who we are and how we learn, no matter how much the field of neuroscience has advanced since the split-brain experiments were conducted.
It's time to give up this notion. Real science demands it of us.
Image Credit: Rakkandee/Shutterstock.com
There's a growing understanding that drawing is much more than an art form: it's a powerful tool for learning.
- We often think of drawing as something that takes innate talent, but this kind of thinking stems from our misclassification of drawing as, primarily, an art form rather than a tool for learning.
- Researchers, teachers, and artists are starting to see how drawing can positively impact a wide variety of skills and disciplines.
- Drawing is not an innate gift; rather, it can be taught and developed. Doing so helps people to perceive the world more accurately, remember facts better, and understand their world from a new perspective.
It may be simpler than we thought.
- An analysis of a massive amount of data reveals four new personality types.
- The study is the first to take self-reporting out of the equation.
- The four new types are "average," "reserved," "self-centered," and "role model".
Despite its prominence in our collective imagination, variations in metabolism play a minor role in obesity.
- Vox senior health correspondent Julia Belluz spent a day inside of a metabolic chamber at the National Institutes of Health Clinical Center.
- Her 90 minutes on stationary cycle only burned 405 calories, just 17% of the day's total calories.
- Resting metabolism uses up the bulk of the body's energy.
SMARTER FASTER trademarks owned by The Big Think, Inc. All rights reserved.