David Goggins
Former Navy Seal
Career Development
Bryan Cranston
Critical Thinking
Liv Boeree
International Poker Champion
Emotional Intelligence
Amaryllis Fox
Former CIA Clandestine Operative
Chris Hadfield
Retired Canadian Astronaut & Author
from the world's big
Start Learning

Against the Odds: Why We All Live for a Future We Can't Control

Living in the moment is an exception, not the rule. So why do we invest so much energy into a future we can't predict, control, or anticipate? It turns out our happiness may depend on it.

VICTORIA MCGEER: What is it about our way of inhabiting our own agency that makes us so directed towards future states of affairs that we don’t completely control whether or not they come about? So these are things that may happen. They’re things that we can work towards, but we never have any guarantee that they will happen. And yet we invest a lot of our energy in that. I’ve come to think of that as a very special and characteristic feature of our own human agency, that we are structured in that way. We just do not have very fulfilling or happy human lives if we’re not directing our agency, our energy towards those anticipated events, hoped for events. 

When we think about human development we’re a very atypical kind of species insofar as when we’re born, unlike most other species, we have very little self-standing capacity to survive in the world. We need other people. We need our parents. We need other caregivers to help us develop the kinds of skills or capacities we need to be able to survive, to be able to flourish in our world. So we rely on others to give us those skills, to teach us those skills, to enable us to become fully fledged autonomous individuals. And that process is a long drawn out one and it involves a certain important relationship with our caregivers that they’re able to structure our environment in such a way that they bring us little by little into certain rather complex sorts of engagements with the world, allowing us little by little to build up our capacities for linguistic engagement, for the kind of skills we need to play with toys. You know when you think about very early development and the way a mother may be interacting with her child. Showing the child how to handle a toy or something so the child now comes to be able to do it for him or herself.

Those are very small acts but those are the way we build up all our skills through our long protracted development. And that’s what psychologists have called parental scaffolding that we treat our infants as if they’re capable of doing things that they’re not quite yet capable of but we’re structuring a world for them in which they’re able to try and explore their limitations and maybe be frustrated at times. But slowly, little by little, learn how to do things for themselves that they couldn’t do initially.

Living in the moment is an exception, not the rule. So why do we invest so much energy into a future we can't predict, control, or anticipate? It turns out our happiness may depend on it. There is something deeply biological about our ability, and our need, to control the future. Despite the fact that the future is precisely what foils our most carefully laid plans, we go on planning for it. An emphasis on future planning is even a vital part of raising children. A great deal of our own well being depends on grooming future generations to hope, to anticipate, to plan.This video is part of a collaborative series with the Hope & Optimism initiative, which has supported interdisciplinary academic research into under-explored aspects of hope and optimism. Discover more at

The “new normal” paradox: What COVID-19 has revealed about higher education

Higher education faces challenges that are unlike any other industry. What path will ASU, and universities like ASU, take in a post-COVID world?

Photo: Luis Robayo/AFP via Getty Images
Sponsored by Charles Koch Foundation
  • Everywhere you turn, the idea that coronavirus has brought on a "new normal" is present and true. But for higher education, COVID-19 exposes a long list of pernicious old problems more than it presents new problems.
  • It was widely known, yet ignored, that digital instruction must be embraced. When combined with traditional, in-person teaching, it can enhance student learning outcomes at scale.
  • COVID-19 has forced institutions to understand that far too many higher education outcomes are determined by a student's family income, and in the context of COVID-19 this means that lower-income students, first-generation students and students of color will be disproportionately afflicted.
Keep reading Show less

Why is everyone so selfish? Science explains

The coronavirus pandemic has brought out the perception of selfishness among many.

Credit: Adobe Stock, Olivier Le Moal.
Personal Growth
  • Selfish behavior has been analyzed by philosophers and psychologists for centuries.
  • New research shows people may be wired for altruistic behavior and get more benefits from it.
  • Crisis times tend to increase self-centered acts.
Keep reading Show less

How Hemingway felt about fatherhood

Parenting could be a distraction from what mattered most to him: his writing.

Ernest Hemingway Holding His Son 1927 (Wikimedia Commons)
Culture & Religion

Ernest Hemingway was affectionately called “Papa," but what kind of dad was he?

Keep reading Show less

How DNA revealed the woolly mammoth's fate – and what it teaches us today

Scientists uncovered the secrets of what drove some of the world's last remaining woolly mammoths to extinction.

Ethan Miller/Getty Images
Surprising Science

Every summer, children on the Alaskan island of St Paul cool down in Lake Hill, a crater lake in an extinct volcano – unaware of the mysteries that lie beneath.

Keep reading Show less

The biology of aliens: How much do we know?

Hollywood has created an idea of aliens that doesn't match the science.

  • Ask someone what they think aliens look like and you'll probably get a description heavily informed by films and pop culture. The existence of life beyond our planet has yet to be confirmed, but there are clues as to the biology of extraterrestrials in science.
  • "Don't give them claws," says biologist E.O. Wilson. "Claws are for carnivores and you've got to be an omnivore to be an E.T. There just isn't enough energy available in the next trophic level down to maintain big populations and stable populations that can evolve civilization."
  • In this compilation, Wilson, theoretical physicist Michio Kaku, Bill Nye, and evolutionary biologist Jonathan B. Losos explain why aliens don't look like us and why Hollywood depictions are mostly inaccurate.
Keep reading Show less