The Clintons and Iraq

Question: How did the Clinton administration affect the Iraqi view of America?


James Goldgeier Well, there was, I mean, at the end of the Persian Gulf War, I mean there were a couple incidents. First of all there was a big humanitarian crisis in the north where the Kurds were living, and the United States airlifted supplies and, you know, the United Nations community really tried to prevent or tried to alleviate the unfolding humanitarian disaster and, you know, was really very supportive of the Kurds. You had in the south, the United States at the end of the Gulf War seemed to be encouraging the Shiites to rise up against Saddam and then the United States didn't follow through with support. So there was a lot of bad feeling that the United States had called on something and then not really helped and left Saddam in power. And, you know, then had been in charge of a sanctions regime that, to a lot of the rest of the world because Saddam Hussein was still able to siphon off the kind of finances he needed to live the lavish lifestyle he needed, there were still a lot of people suffering in Iraq and so, you know, we never really found the right policy for trying to address our concerns about humanitarian issues in Iraq with trying to keep Saddam, we used to call it "keeping him in his box." That is, keeping him from being able to develop weapons of mass destruction and being able to threaten his neighbors. On the latter, I mean, that we were doing through the Clinton years. There were a lot of people who felt it was unsustainable, but, you know, the United States was flying missions all the time to patrol the no-fly zones and we were occasionally bombing Iraq, did not suffer any casualties. So, you know, there is a lot of thought, "oh that couldn't continue." But, you know, it was going on without-- and Saddam was being kept in his box, but it was this sense, it's got to do something more than that, and that's how the George W. Bush team came in.


Recorded on: 07/08/2008


Because we were never able to find the right policy, there was a perception that we cut and run, says James Goldgeier.

Does science tell the truth?

It is impossible for science to arrive at ultimate truths, but functional truths are good enough.

Credit: Sergey Nivens / 202871840
  • What is truth? This is a very tricky question, trickier than many would like to admit.
  • Science does arrive at what we can call functional truth, that is, when it focuses on what something does as opposed to what something is. We know how gravity operates, but not what gravity is, a notion that has changed over time and will probably change again.
  • The conclusion is that there are not absolute final truths, only functional truths that are agreed upon by consensus. The essential difference is that scientific truths are agreed upon by factual evidence, while most other truths are based on belief.
Keep reading Show less

A canvas of nonsense: how Dada reflects a world gone mad through art

Using urinals, psychological collages, and animated furniture to shock us into reality.

Credit: MICHELE LIMINA via Getty Images
Culture & Religion
  • Dada is a provocative and surreal art movement born out of the madness of World War I.
  • Tzara, a key Dada theorist, says Dada seeks "to confuse and upset, to shake and jolt" people from their comfort zones.
  • Dada, as all avant-garde art, faces a key problem in how to stay true to its philosophy.
Keep reading Show less

Physicists Accidentally Discover a Self-Destruct Button for the Entire Universe

Unfortunately, humanity will never see it coming. 


A computer image of a Higgs interaction. By Lucas Taylor / CERN, CC BY-SA 3.0, Wikipedia Commons.
Technology & Innovation

It sounds like a plot from a comic book or a sci-fi film, a theory that got a boost when one of the greatest discoveries in physics in the modern era, the discovery of the “God particle,”or the Higgs boson, the missing piece in the Standard Model of particle physics. In the preface to his book Starmus, Stephen Hawking warns that the Higgs Boson field could collapse, resulting in a chain reaction that would take in the whole universe with it.  

Keep reading Show less

Study: Tripping might not be required for psychedelic therapy

Two different studies provide further evidence of the efficacy of psychedelics in treating depression.

Photo: agsandrew / Adobe Stock
Surprising Science
  • A phase 2 clinical trial by Imperial College London found psilocybin to be as effective at treating depression as escitalopram, a commonly prescribed antidepressant.
  • A different study by the University of Maryland showed that blocking the hallucinogenic effects of magic mushrooms in mice did not reduce the antidepressant effect.
  • Combined, these studies could lead to new ways of applying psychedelics to patient populations that don't want to trip.
Keep reading Show less