Steven Pinker on Human Evolution

Question: Does humankind have an overarching purpose or direction?

Pinker:    One of the things that I think science show us is that the idea that there’s some purpose to the universe is one that we should outgrow.  There’s a purpose to each one of our lives, and we can articulate what that purpose is and why we have it; but why humans emerged on earth, why there is a planet earth, why the universe does what it does, we’ve got to outgrow these questions.  It is very clear that there is no purpose in that sense.  The fact that the sun will expand and consume the entire earth; that the universe might blow apart; that 99 percent of species go extinct and it would be sort of arrogant to say that homosapiens would be the only one that doesn’t; the fact that the earth is one out of presumably thousands, and millions, and billions of planets that could support life – that there’s nothing distinguished about our solar system.  All of those realizations say that the idea that we were put here for some purpose is a kind of medieval ignorance and arrogance.  That doesn’t mean that we humans, with the brains that we have, with our understanding of what we value and don’t, don’t have a purpose.  And in many ways there is a kind of fulfillment of human purposes that has gone on through history owing to the cumulative efforts of humans to make something of their lot to achieve something worth while.  We know more.  It’s astonishing how much we do know.  There’s lots we don’t know, but the fact that we know the genetic code of life; that we know how old the universe is; that we know how the earth was formed; that we know the basic constituents of chemistry, this is mind boggling stuff.  People in the 17th century would have given up anything for a glimpse of what we know today.  That’s something to be . . . to celebrate.  The fact that we’ve gotten less violent over time.  We no longer have human sacrifices.  We’ve outlawed slavery in most of the world.  We no longer have capital punishment for trivial crimes and misdemeanors.  We don’t have routine torture, burning at the stake, disemboweling, crucifixion.  The number of wars has gone down in the last 50 years.  By many measures we’ve become a less violent species; not because there is some force in the universe pushing us in that direction, but I think because we recognize the futility and the undesirability of violence.  And we tinker in various ways to reduce them.  And in some degree slowly, incrementally we’ve succeeded. 

Question: What is human nature?

Pinker:    Because I do believe that there is such a thing as human nature, I think there are some things that will always be with us.  I think that people will always have a measure of self-deception, and so we always think that we’re right, and that we’re virtuous, and we’re omniscient.  And so we have to have that beaten out of us by arguments, and debate, and reality checking, and mechanisms like peer review, and science, and laws, and fines in the legal system.  I think that children will always be unruly.  I think that men and women will always be distinguishable.  I think that we will never be born knowing how to read or to do math, but we’ll always need education.  I think there are a large number of traits that I think will be here in a thousand years.  On the other hand, among those traits are combinatorial abilities like the ones that I believe power language.  Combinatorial abilities can give rise to an explosion of possibilities.  There are a hundred, million, trillion different sentences, grammatical and meaningful sentences 20 words longer or less.  Even if there’s a fixed set of rules that cranks out those sentences, there is in effect no limit as to the number of thoughts we can express in words.  By analogy, human nature, the thoughts that we can think, the goals that we can have, if they’re combinatorial as well, there are maybe no limits in practice to the actual behavior that we can expect from people.  They will be challenged in certain ways.  They will still conform to certain rules; but we haven’t even sampled a remote fraction of them. That’s why ultimately even though I believe in a fixed human nature, I don’t believe in a fixed human condition.  Because with the resources of human nature, there’s no limit to the . . .  ________ to the kinds of discoveries that we make with the kinds of ways we can figure out to get along with each other.

Evolutionary psychologist Steven Pinker's strangely optimistic forecast.

LinkedIn meets Tinder in this mindful networking app

Swipe right to make the connections that could change your career.

Getty Images
Sponsored
Swipe right. Match. Meet over coffee or set up a call.

No, we aren't talking about Tinder. Introducing Shapr, a free app that helps people with synergistic professional goals and skill sets easily meet and collaborate.

Keep reading Show less

People who engage in fat-shaming tend to score high in this personality trait

A new study explores how certain personality traits affect individuals' attitudes on obesity in others.

Pixabay
Mind & Brain
  • The study compared personality traits and obesity views among more than 3,000 mothers.
  • The results showed that the personality traits neuroticism and extraversion are linked to more negative views and behaviors related to obesity.
  • People who scored high in conscientiousness are more likely to experience "fat phobia.
Keep reading Show less

The most culturally chauvinist people in Europe? Greeks, new research suggests

Meanwhile, Spaniards are the least likely to say their culture is superior to others.

Image: Pew Research Center
Strange Maps
  • Survey by Pew Research Center shows great variation in chauvinism across Europe.
  • Eight most chauvinist countries are in the east, and include Russia.
  • British much more likely than French (and slightly more likely than Germans) to say their culture is "superior" to others.
Keep reading Show less

Reigning in brutality - how one man's outrage led to the Red Cross and the Geneva Conventions

The history of the Geneva Conventions tells us how the international community draws the line on brutality.

Napoleon III at the Battle of Solferino. Painting by Adolphe Yvon. 1861.
Politics & Current Affairs
  • Henry Dunant's work led to the Red Cross and conventions on treating prisoners humanely.
  • Four Geneva Conventions defined the rules for prisoners of war, torture, naval and medical personnel and more.
  • Amendments to the agreements reflect the modern world but have not been ratified by all countries.
Keep reading Show less