Power and Criminal Justice
Peter J. Schaffer, Attorney at Law devotes his practice to New York State criminal defense and the defense of all federal criminal matters throughout the United States. From his office in Bronx, New York, Mr. Schaffer is readily accessible to all New York City, Nassau and Westchester County Criminal and State Supreme Courts, as well as the U.S. District Courts for the District of Connecticut and the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York.
With a wealth of experience handling cases ranging from simple traffic violations to complex federal death penalty eligible felonies, Mr. Schaffer uses the knowledge and skills he has developed over the past twenty-one years of trial work to help his clients achieve the best result in every case he defends.
Mr. Schaffer appears regularly on The Nancy Grace Show on CNN HeadlineNews, and on IN SESSION on truTV (formerly, courtTV), and has been heard on Sirius Satellite Radio and Bloomberg Radio as a guest commentator on nationally prominent criminal trials.
Peter Schaffer: Well, it depends who the person in power is. I mean, you know, the Supreme Court are very powerful people and they influence the system in infinite ways, usually ways that, you know, I don’t agree with, or I should say recently in ways that I don’t agree with. But I mean people in politics can change the law. I mean there are people that are- there are in rare instances people in power that donate to organizations that help the criminal justice system, but I think that’s- usually in the criminal justice system when we think of someone in power, it’s usually someone that’s gonna affect our clients negatively.
Question: What are the most unfair sentences?
Peter Schaffer: Well, I mean in my case, I think that in the federal system there are mandatory minimum sentences that congress has come along and said we don’t want to give a judge discretion in certain cases and that we don’t care who the individual that’s arrested is; if they’re found
guilty of a particular crime, they must serve this minimum sentence. I think those are particularly unfair. I think that people that are charged with crimes and receive inadequate defense, you know, you hear horror stories about people that have death penalty trials in other parts of the country where the trial lasts a half a day or a day and, you know, the trial lawyer fell asleep or didn’t do very basic things. There’s a lot of unfairness going on.
How judicious is our judicial system?
New research links urban planning and political polarization.
- Canadian researchers find that excessive reliance on cars changes political views.
- Decades of car-centric urban planning normalized unsustainable lifestyles.
- People who prefer personal comfort elect politicians who represent such views.
Progressive America would be half as big, but twice as populated as its conservative twin.
- America's two political tribes have consolidated into 'red' and 'blue' nations, with seemingly irreconcilable differences.
- Perhaps the best way to stop the infighting is to go for a divorce and give the two nations a country each
- Based on the UN's partition plan for Israel/Palestine, this proposal provides territorial contiguity and sea access to both 'red' and 'blue' America
Science and the squishiness of the human mind. The joys of wearing whatever the hell you want, and so much more.
- Why can't we have a human-sized cat tree?
- What would happen if you got a spoonful of a neutron star?
- Why do we insist on dividing our wonderfully complex selves into boring little boxes
SMARTER FASTER trademarks owned by The Big Think, Inc. All rights reserved.