Michael Schrage: "Making Customers Better Makes Better Customers"
Author and innovation expert Michael Schrage explains that it's not enough to invest in the innovative qualities of your workforce; you have to invest in bettering your customers as well.
Michael Schrage examines the various roles of models, prototypes, and simulations as collaborative media for innovation risk management. He has served as an advisor on innovation issues and investments to major firms, including Mars, Procter & Gamble, Google, Intel, BT, Siemens, NASDAQ, IBM, and Alcoa. In addition, Schrage has advised segments of the national security community on cyber conflict and cybersecurity issues. He has presented workshops on design experimentation and innovation risk for businesses, organizations, and executive education programs worldwide. Along with running summer workshops on future technologies for the Pentagon's Office of Net Assessment, he has served on the technical advisory committee of MIT's Lincoln Laboratory. In collaboration with the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), Schrage helped launch a series of workshops sponsored by the Department of Defense on federal complex systems procurement. In 2007, he served as a judge for the Industrial Designers Society of America's global International Design Excellence Awards.
Michael Schrage: I think one of the most important findings in my book, in my research, is that innovators fundamentally misunderstand human capital as an asset, human capital as a resource. The majority of organizations that want to innovate say, "We need to get innovators. We need to improve the capabilities and competencies of our employees. We need to hire people who are willing to take a chance, et cetera, and be innovative." And the whole notion of, you know, our competitive advantage in this post-industrial era is that we have better human capital than our competitors. Google has better people than IBM has better people than Apple has better people than Amazon and blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. I submit that’s the exact wrong way to look at it. Not that it’s wrong in the sense of false, but wrong in the way of being incomplete. What about your customers’ human capital? What about your clients’ human capital? The Gedankenexperiment, the thought experiment, I want people to give very, very serious consideration to is what if we stopped thinking of innovation as something that’s new and valuable that we market and sell and what if we start thinking about innovation as an investment in the human capital capabilities and competencies of our customers.
Yes, Henry Ford transformed the factory-production system with mass production of the automobile, the Model T, the Model A, et cetera. And everybody celebrates that as a milestone in business history. I submit that economic historians, business historians, marketers missed the essential point. Henry Ford didn’t just enable the mass production of automobiles. He facilitated the mass creation of the human capital of driving. Everybody drives. It’s an asset. It transforms markets. It transforms individual and organizational capabilities. Why do we not spend as much time focusing on the human capital and adding value to the human capital of our customers and our clients as opposed to our employees? I think that’s the essential innovation takeaway. How do our innovations transform the human capital of our customers, not just the human capital of the people who work for us and with us?
The reason why I came up with the design heuristic "making customers better makes better customers" is because I wanted to help innovative organizations filter and prioritize their innovation investments. It’s not enough to make your customer better if you don’t reap the benefits of that investment. Conversely, if we’re just making a better customer, that’s exploitation. So what you’re trying to do is align an innovation investment that makes your customer measurably better in some way that matters to that customer, in some ways that matter to that client. But at the same time you’re making that customer more valuable to themselves, you’re making them more valuable to you. By making them a better customer, you’re making them a better customer for you. Making customers better makes better customers.
Author and innovation expert Michael Schrage explains that it's not enough to invest in the innovative qualities of your workforce; you have to invest in bettering your customers as well. Savvy entrepreneurs should seek ways to transform the human capital of their clientele to the degree that an investment made in them pays off in the long run. Schrage's design heuristic "making customers better makes better customers" is further discussed in his book What Do You Want Your Customers to Become?
Torn between absolutism on the left and the right, classical liberalism—with its core values of compassion and incremental progress whereby the once-radical becomes the mainstream—is in need of a good defense. And Adam Gopnik is its lawyer.
- Liberalism as "radical pragmatism"
- Intersectionality and civic discourse
- How "a thousand small sanities" tackled drunk driving, normalized gay marriage, and could control gun violence
Irish president believes students need philosophy.
- President of Ireland Michael D. Higgins calls for students to be thought of as more than tools made to be useful.
- Higgins believes that philosophy and history should be a basic requirement forming a core education.
- The Irish Young Philosopher Awards is one such event that is celebrating this discipline among the youth.
The lost practice of face-to-face communication has made the world a more extreme place.
- The world was saner when we spoke face-to-face, argues John Cameron Mitchell. Not looking someone in the eye when you talk to them raises the potential for miscommunication and conflict.
- Social media has been an incredible force for activism and human rights, but it's also negatively affected our relationship with the media. We are now bombarded 24/7 with news that either drives us to anger or apathy.
- Sitting behind a screen makes polarization worse, and polarization is fertile ground for conspiracy theories and fascism, which Cameron describes as irrationally blaming someone else for your problems.
SMARTER FASTER trademarks owned by The Big Think, Inc. All rights reserved.