Michael Schrage: "Making Customers Better Makes Better Customers"

Author and innovation expert Michael Schrage explains that it's not enough to invest in the innovative qualities of your workforce; you have to invest in bettering your customers as well.

Michael Schrage: I think one of the most important findings in my book, in my research, is that innovators fundamentally misunderstand human capital as an asset, human capital as a resource. The majority of organizations that want to innovate say, "We need to get innovators. We need to improve the capabilities and competencies of our employees. We need to hire people who are willing to take a chance, et cetera, and be innovative." And the whole notion of, you know, our competitive advantage in this post-industrial era is that we have better human capital than our competitors. Google has better people than IBM has better people than Apple has better people than Amazon and blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. I submit that’s the exact wrong way to look at it. Not that it’s wrong in the sense of false, but wrong in the way of being incomplete. What about your customers’ human capital? What about your clients’ human capital? The Gedankenexperiment, the thought experiment, I want people to give very, very serious consideration to is what if we stopped thinking of innovation as something that’s new and valuable that we market and sell and what if we start thinking about innovation as an investment in the human capital capabilities and competencies of our customers.

Yes, Henry Ford transformed the factory-production system with mass production of the automobile, the Model T, the Model A, et cetera. And everybody celebrates that as a milestone in business history. I submit that economic historians, business historians, marketers missed the essential point. Henry Ford didn’t just enable the mass production of automobiles. He facilitated the mass creation of the human capital of driving. Everybody drives. It’s an asset. It transforms markets. It transforms individual and organizational capabilities. Why do we not spend as much time focusing on the human capital and adding value to the human capital of our customers and our clients as opposed to our employees? I think that’s the essential innovation takeaway. How do our innovations transform the human capital of our customers, not just the human capital of the people who work for us and with us?

The reason why I came up with the design heuristic "making customers better makes better customers" is because I wanted to help innovative organizations filter and prioritize their innovation investments. It’s not enough to make your customer better if you don’t reap the benefits of that investment. Conversely, if we’re just making a better customer, that’s exploitation. So what you’re trying to do is align an innovation investment that makes your customer measurably better in some way that matters to that customer, in some ways that matter to that client. But at the same time you’re making that customer more valuable to themselves, you’re making them more valuable to you. By making them a better customer, you’re making them a better customer for you. Making customers better makes better customers.


Author and innovation expert Michael Schrage explains that it's not enough to invest in the innovative qualities of your workforce; you have to invest in bettering your customers as well. Savvy entrepreneurs should seek ways to transform the human capital of their clientele to the degree that an investment made in them pays off in the long run. Schrage's design heuristic "making customers better makes better customers" is further discussed in his book What Do You Want Your Customers to Become?

The digital economy benefits the 1%. Here’s how to change that.

A pragmatic approach to fixing an imbalanced system.

  • Intentional or not, certain inequalities are inherent in a digital economy that is structured and controlled by a few corporations that don't represent the interests or the demographics of the majority.
  • While concern and anger are valid reactions to these inequalities, UCLA professor Ramesh Srinivasan also sees it as an opportunity to take action.
  • Srinivasan says that the digital economy can be reshaped to benefit the 99 percent if we protect laborers in the gig economy, get independent journalists involved with the design of algorithmic news systems, support small businesses, and find ways that groups that have been historically discriminated against can be a part of these solutions.
Surprising Science

The idea that Alzheimer's is a form of diabetic disease has been gaining currency in medical circles for almost ten years. The accumulated evidence is now so strong that many specialists are now comfortable referring to Alzheimer's as type 3 diabetes.

Keep reading

Social media makes breakups worse, study says

Is there a way for more human-centered algorithms to prevent potentially triggering interactions on social media?

Image by Pranch on Shutterstock
Sex & Relationships
  • According to a 2017 study, 71% of people reported feeling better (rediscovery of self and positive emotions) about 11 weeks after a breakup. But social media complicates this healing process.
  • Even if you "unfriend", block, or unfollow, social media algorithms can create upsetting encounters with your ex-partner or reminders of the relationship that once was.
  • Researchers at University of Colorado Boulder suggest that a "human-centered approach" to creating algorithms can help the system better understand the complex social interactions we have with people online and prevent potentially upsetting encounters.
Keep reading