Mehmet Oz On Technology and Health Care

Mehmet Oz On Technology and Health Care

Mehmet Oz: I could not do what I do without technology. I am wired in all the time but I make it seamless so it’s easy. I have a [IB] account which it seems like a commercial but it’s… I’ve no affiliation, but I love the fact that I can store my files in or somewhere in space and I can always get access to them and my e-mail is seamless for that reason as well. The other thing about technology I’ve realized that if you really want to communicate to folks when they’re ready to hear it which is important, you got to do on the web. Although I love doing television, the folks aren’t ready to hear the message that I’m delivering when I’m on the tube, it doesn’t have much of an impact. And by creating a fairly robust web element to all the things we’re doing to teach people about health, I’m giving people news they can use when they want it. [Think about as we got on] a plane, right? The stewardess starts going on, moaning about how to put the seatbelts on and the emergency experts so like in Charlie Brown when the [IB] wah, wah, wah, wah, wah, right? You filter it all out, you filter it, nothing gets through, but what if 35,000 feet, if the plane shakes, now, you want to clue in, now you care about the emergency exit and exactly how do I get the oxygen masks down if they fall, and those were the kinds of questions you want to answer when people asking them. So, I want to use the web in particular to get folks the information that’s absolutely essential for the well-being at their fingertips.

Dr. Oz hopes that increased access to online information will transform our understanding of healthcare.

LinkedIn meets Tinder in this mindful networking app

Swipe right to make the connections that could change your career.

Getty Images
Swipe right. Match. Meet over coffee or set up a call.

No, we aren't talking about Tinder. Introducing Shapr, a free app that helps people with synergistic professional goals and skill sets easily meet and collaborate.

Keep reading Show less

Brain study finds circuits that may help you keep your cool

Research by neuroscientists at MIT's Picower Institute for Learning and Memory helps explain how the brain regulates arousal.

Photo by CHARLY TRIBALLEAU / AFP/ Getty Images
Mind & Brain

MIT News

The big day has come: You are taking your road test to get your driver's license. As you start your mom's car with a stern-faced evaluator in the passenger seat, you know you'll need to be alert but not so excited that you make mistakes. Even if you are simultaneously sleep-deprived and full of nervous energy, you need your brain to moderate your level of arousal so that you do your best.

Keep reading Show less

34 years ago, a KGB defector chillingly predicted modern America

A disturbing interview given by a KGB defector in 1984 describes America of today and outlines four stages of mass brainwashing used by the KGB.

Politics & Current Affairs
  • Bezmenov described this process as "a great brainwashing" which has four basic stages.
  • The first stage is called "demoralization" which takes from 15 to 20 years to achieve.
  • According to the former KGB agent, that is the minimum number of years it takes to re-educate one generation of students that is normally exposed to the ideology of its country.
Keep reading Show less

How pharmaceutical companies game the patent system

When these companies compete, in the current system, the people lose.

Politics & Current Affairs
  • When a company reaches the top of the ladder, they typically kick it away so that others cannot climb up on it. The aim? So that another company can't compete.
  • When this phenomenon happens in the pharmaceutical world, companies quickly apply for broad protection of their patents, which can last up to 20 years, and fence off research areas for others. The result of this? They stay at the top of the ladder, at the cost of everyday people benefitting from increased competition.
  • Since companies have worked out how to legally game the system, Amin argues we need to get rid of this "one size fits all" system, which treats product innovation the same as product invention. Companies should still receive an incentive for coming up with new products, he says, but not 20 years if the product is the result of "tweaking" an existing one.