Good Communication Is Much More than the Words You Use—Take It from Alan Alda
Communication is more than a string of words that gets across static information. The language we use to converse does more than give facts—it can actually offer understanding.
Alan Alda has earned international recognition as an actor, writer and director. In addition to The Aviator, for which he was nominated for an Academy Award, Alda's films include Crimes and Misdemeanors, Everyone Says I Love You, Flirting With Disaster, Manhattan Murder Mystery, And The Band Played On, Same Time, Next Year and California Suite, as well as The Seduction of Joe Tynan, which he wrote, and The Four Seasons, Sweet Liberty, A New Life and Betsy's Wedding, all of which he wrote and directed. Recently, his film appearances have included Tower Heist, Wanderlust, and Steven Spielberg's Bridge of Spies.
He helped found the Alan Alda Center for Communicating Science at Stony Brook University where he is a Visiting Professor, helping to develop innovative programs that enable scientists to communicate more effectively with the public. He originated The Flame Challenge, a yearly international competition for scientists in which they compete to explain complex scientific concepts so that 11-year-olds can understand them. Since 2008, he has worked with physicist Brian Greene in presenting the annual World Science Festival in New York City, attended since its inception by over a million people. He has won numerous awards for communicating science from the National Academy of Sciences, the American Chemical Society, and the National Science Board.
Alda was born in New York City, the son of the distinguished actor, Robert Alda. He began acting in the theater at the age of 16 in summer stock in Barnesville, Pennsylvania.
During his junior year at Fordham University, he studied in Europe where he performed on the stage in Rome and on television in Amsterdam with his father.
After college, he acted at the Cleveland Playhouse on a Ford Foundation grant. On his return to New York, he was seen on Broadway, off-Broadway and on television. He later acquired improvisational training with "Second City" in New York and "Compass" at Hyannisport. That background in political and social satire led to his work as a regular on television's "That Was the Week That Was."
His wife, Arlene, is the author of nineteen books, including her latest, Just Kids from the Bronx. An award winning professional photographer, her work has appeared in a number of magazines and books. They have three daughters and eight grandchildren.c
ALAN ALDA: Jargon gets a bad reputation for good reasons. But there's something good about jargon, and I think it should be explored because jargon hangs on, I think, in our speech because it has a usefulness.
When people in the same profession have a word that stands for five pages of written knowledge, why say five pages of stuff when you can say one word? And if the other person understands it exactly the way you understand it then jargon has usefulness.
The trouble is we develop such specialized words that they're not understood by people with just a little distance from our expertise. For instance, even show business, which you wouldn't expect to have a technical jargon—or you might not expect it—even show business has it, movie making. “Take this gobo and put it on the Century over there, and hurry up because this is the martini shot. And while you're at it bring me a half-apple.” That's not understood to most people and it's crystal clear to somebody who's been on a movie set for a while. I guess I have to explain it or people will be writing you letters saying “what does all that mean?”
A gobo is a thing that blocks out light. A Century is a Century stand made by the Century Company many decades ago, and their name is on the stand. It's the stand that holds up a light or a gobo. The martini shot is the last shot of the day before you go home and have a martini. And a half-apple is a box half the size of an apple-box that you can put things on, like people who are too short. That's jargon for a movie set. But jargon has another evil use aside from separating us from one another, and that is that when we want to use it to make ourselves look really smart, “I’m smart I talk like this, you can't really talk like this so you're not as smart as me.” A lot of us do this unconsciously, and it's not necessary. We get more done if we open ourselves up.
It's really fun to be on the verge of saying something that is probably not going to be understood by the other person and to say, “wait a second, how can I say this in really plain language?” And if we do that sometimes we learn more about the jargon than we thought we knew. We humanize it, we reduce it to the simplest concepts—what are the concepts that really matter in this?—And then the jargon sometimes gets cleaned off and polished of some of the luster of hifalutin-ness that doesn't help the jargon be helpful.
Choice of words does matter. It matters a lot. But I think that it's important to remember that if all we do is get the right words in our head, and the right order of words, and think that that's going to make all by itself good communication, I think we're missing the boat.
Because really, effective communication is not just because I have something perfect to say to you. It really occurs when you understand and internalize what I have to say and are able to make it your own, to remember it, and that kind of thing.
Here's an interesting example of that. One of our medical students who we were training to communicate better was on rounds with a supervising M.D. and the doctor who was in charge was talking to a patient, and he had to explain to her that she had incurable cancer and she was going to die. And he was talking to her, and as he was telling her all this really hard-to-take information she wasn't asking questions and you could tell by the look on her face, or at least the medical student could tell by the look on her face that she wasn't understanding it. She was just listening with kind of a blank expression.
And the lead doctor says, "Okay so I'll talk to you later," or whatever he said and left, and the young medical student said, "Do you mind if I stay for a few minutes with her and talk to her?" And he was given permission to do that.
So now he sat down right opposite her and took her hand in his, and he started to say many of the same things that the other doctor had said but he didn't use the same words. So the words changed. He didn't say “metastasis”, he talked in simpler terms but he was making contact with her, he was looking in her eyes, he was opening himself up to her as he talked to her. And little by little she started to cry and she started to ask questions, and finally she understood she was going to die and he helped her through that understanding. He helped her get that understanding because she wasn't protected against this barrage of impersonal communication that the other doctor had been giving her. And what he said, what this young the doctor said to us—this medical student—was that it brought him back to one of our basic exercises. It was a mirroring exercise where he had to mirror the movements of another person. And when that happens, well, you get in-sync, and he said, "I was mirroring her and she began to mirror me—because she helped me be a better doctor, because she responded with tears to what I was saying, which let me know she really understood me." He was so moved by the experience that he began to cry himself in the experience.
And I don't think he was crying because he felt her pain at the awareness that she was going to die. I think he was moved because this connection had taken place, and he realized that the movement he had made during the workshops to be able to make this kind of contact with another person was a profound experience, and he said that he would never forget the experience and how it came from the simple mirroring exercise. So that was a wonderful experience for us to hear about, because it was a personal way of letting us know that people can be changed by this.
Communication is more than a string of words that gets across static information. The language we use to converse does more than give facts—it can actually offer understanding. Take it from Alan Alda, a career actor whose craft thrives on effective communication through openness and emotional availability. When Alda isn't on set, he is working to help people communicate more effectively. Through the Alan Alda Center for Communication Science, he helps people understand techniques, like mirroring, that can be deployed to enhance communication. While certain tools of language, like jargon, can facilitate more efficient communication between individuals who share a specialized lexicon, they can also confuse the non-initiated. Alda has summarized his adventures in in the art and science of communication in his book, If I Understood You, Would I Have This Look on My Face?.
"It's just a joke," right?
Q: Why did the woman cross the road?
A: Who cares! What the hell is she doing out of the kitchen?
Q: Why hasn't NASA sent a woman to the moon?
A: It doesn't need cleaning yet!
These two jokes represent disparagement humor – any attempt to amuse through the denigration of a social group or its representatives.
Just hearing two languages helps babies develop cognitive skills before they even speak. Here's how - and how you can help them develop those skills.
A new study shows that babies raised in bilingual environments develop core cognitive skills like decision-making and problem-solving -- before they even speak.
Paying a fee for greenhouse gas emissions may spur a revolution, in terms of corporate behavior, amid the climate crisis.
- When it comes to politically addressing the climate crisis, we need politicians from both sides of the aisle to work together to create policies that bring about a more sustainable tomorrow.
- If we enact policies that require companies to pay for their greenhouse gas emissions, we would see an immediate change of behavior from them, in regard to how much they contribute to climate change.
- There's growing agreement that the climate crisis is real among both Republicans and Democrats. The main concern, however, among those who are still critical of its significance is whether it will limit people's choices or slow the economy.