Does "Internet Famous" Mean Famous?
Jonathan\r\n Coulton: I definitely consider myself "internet famous" at this \r\npoint. I think the difference between famous and "internet famous," it's\r\n a dividing line that is getting a little fuzzier, really month by month\r\n at this point, not just for me but I think as our culture changes, and I\r\n think it's about the medium that you are famous in. If you are famous \r\nfor being on television, you are reaching a much larger and broader \r\naudience, than anyone who's on the Internet. As popular as certain ideas\r\n and people have become on the Internet, they don't really reach that \r\nkind of super fame, that sort of global broad appeal until they move \r\ninto television.
You know you can look at anything... like \r\nTwitter for example, you know that was a thing that I heard about \r\nthrough somebody else, signed up for it, started using... Nobody cared \r\nabout it, you know, I was explaining it to my friends and they thought I\r\n was crazy. And then you started to see people on the Internet got \r\nexcited about it and started using it and so it was sort of an internet \r\nthing and then you started to see people talking about it all the time \r\non television. That was a very quick transformation. It was very, very \r\nquick it moved into that medium. And that's the point when it became a \r\nreally famous thing. And it's a thing that almost everybody knows about \r\nnow. Maybe they don't understand it. Frequently when it's mentioned, \r\nit's accompanied by a lame joke about how it's weird or stupid or \r\nwhatever. So you know in many ways, it's infamous outside of the \r\nInternet rather than being famous.
But you know, for me my fame \r\nis very targeted, it's not local because it doesn't have anything to do \r\nwith physical space, but it's local on the map of ideas and taste, you \r\nknow, because I'm famous on the Internet for writing a certain kind of \r\nsong. And that appeals to a certain kind of person who's interested in \r\ncertain things. And within a certain community, I'm pretty well-known. \r\nBut just walking down the street here in New York, nobody knows who I \r\nam. I'm rarely recognized in public. And so in many ways it's the best \r\nof both worlds, because I have a fan base that is large and loyal enough\r\n to support me and I get that ego boost that is you know, I know now is \r\nkind of critical to me you know, that feedback from people telling me \r\nthat they like this song or that song or that they really enjoyed this \r\nconcert or that CD.
I get that back and forth, but at the same \r\ntime, I can see how having that kind of relationship with the entire \r\nworld would be kind of unpleasant. You think about somebody like, poor \r\nMichael Jackson, who can't really go out in public anymore. Well, now \r\nhe's dead but when he was alive, he could not go out in public anymore. \r\nAnd I think it's a bizarre thing, that the people that we love the most,\r\n we force them to become shut-ins. We've sort of cut them off from the \r\nrest of the world. It’s a strange thing that fame does.
Question:\r\n Why do certain ideas become Internet famous and others don’t?
Jonathan\r\n Coulton: Well, I think that there are a couple of things at play, \r\nthat govern what kinds of ideas become "internet famous." One of them is\r\n just the fact that there are more geeks on the Internet than there are \r\nnon-geeks on the Internet. And this is just because the Internet is \r\nstill a relatively new medium on this planet. So I think a lot has been \r\nmade of the ascendance of geek culture and you'd be crazy if you didn't \r\nthink a lot of that had to do with the fact that there is the Internet \r\nand now all these people who use computers have a way to use their \r\ncomputers to get together in different ways, to communicate and create \r\nthings and disseminate ideas and bounce them off of one another and \r\nchange ideas. So I think part of it is just the Internet is the perfect \r\nmedium for geeks because geeks like computers and that's mostly where \r\nthe Internet is you know.
But aside from that, I do think the \r\ncommon thread that a lot of internet culture shares is a kind of \r\nhyper-postmodernism. I barely know what I'm talking about here so bear \r\nwith me, but you know I think there's a kind of humor, in particular, \r\nthat is unique to the Internet and it has to do with referencing other \r\nthings in an ironic way, in re-imagining them in a certain way, \r\nrecycling ideas. Of course this is part of what postmodernism means, but\r\n I think there's sort of winky aspect to the things that become really \r\npopular in internet culture that sort of sits on top of that standard \r\npostmodernism, you know, collage combination of different ideas. Look at\r\n LOLCats for example. Which is bizarre and could only exist on the \r\nInternet and is, I think a real good measuring device for determining if\r\n somebody is part of internet culture or not. You know, they're \r\nbasically funny pictures of cats, with a caption you know. And so you \r\ncan say, well that's dumb, that's you know there are lots of greeting \r\ncards that are like that. We've had that for a long time. But there's a \r\nself-referential quality to LOLCats and it's the language that cats \r\nspeak, somehow, it's this kind of pigeon language that cats speak and it\r\n kind of makes sense. I mean, if you're a fan of LOLCats, the reason you\r\n like it is because you see a caption and a funny picture and yes, you \r\nare looking at a funny caption of a funny cat picture, but also there's a\r\n joke there and it's very hard to explain what that joke is to somebody \r\nwho doesn't get it. And it has to do with that language that cats speak,\r\n that is made up, that somehow a very large group of strangers all seems\r\n to agree that this is the language that cats speak. And so, I sound \r\nlike a lunatic just talking about it. And that is, I think, a perfect \r\nexample of the things that become popular on the Internet and why, even \r\nthough I haven't really said why because I don't even know why.
Question:\r\n What do you see yourself as?
Jonathan Coulton: I \r\nwalk a dangerous line between comedy and non-comedy music. Like many \r\nwho've come before me, I'm not the first to do it and it's a troubling \r\nthing sometimes to be known as the guy who writes funny songs when in \r\nactuality my favorite songs are the ones that are not funny at all. My \r\nfavorite songs of mine are the very sad ones. And so, yes, you know I \r\nthink it is, I think it is crazy, I have learned that it is crazy for \r\nany artist to decide how they want, what kind of artist they want to be \r\nknown as. You don't get to decide that. The best-case scenario for you \r\nif you're an artist, is to make the things that you love. To make the \r\nthings that you want to make and to have a group of fans who like it and\r\n support you and who make it possible for you to continue making more \r\nstuff. That's all you can ask for and I think if you start to worry \r\nabout, are people going to think of me as a novelty musician, when \r\nreally I'm a sensitive writer of important songs, then that way lies \r\nmadness. Because it's not up to you to decide and there's little you can\r\n do to change anyone's mind. Once you've put the stuff out there that is\r\n yours, people will make of it what they will and you're lucky to even \r\nbe thinking about trying to change that. So shut up. That's kind of \r\nwhat I think about that. So, I'm just so pleased to be here and you know\r\n I feel so fortunate to be making a living this way. I'm happy for the \r\nfans who think of me as a novelty musician and I'm happy for the fans \r\nwho think of me as a writer of important songs. However you like me, I'm\r\n just glad that you like me.
"My fame is very targeted. It's not local because it doesn't have anything to do with physical space, but it's local on the map of ideas and taste. Walking down the street here in New York, nobody knows who I am."
How a cataclysm worse than what killed the dinosaurs destroyed 90 percent of all life on Earth.
While the demise of the dinosaurs gets more attention as far as mass extinctions go, an even more disastrous event called "the Great Dying” or the “End-Permian Extinction” happened on Earth prior to that. Now scientists discovered how this cataclysm, which took place about 250 million years ago, managed to kill off more than 90 percent of all life on the planet.
A new study discovers the “liking gap” — the difference between how we view others we’re meeting for the first time, and the way we think they’re seeing us.
We tend to be defensive socially. When we meet new people, we’re often concerned with how we’re coming off. Our anxiety causes us to be so concerned with the impression we’re creating that we fail to notice that the same is true of the other person as well. A new study led by Erica J. Boothby, published on September 5 in Psychological Science, reveals how people tend to like us more in first encounters than we’d ever suspect.
Using advanced laser technology, scientists at NASA will track global changes in ice with greater accuracy.
Leaving from Vandenberg Air Force base in California this coming Saturday, at 8:46 a.m. ET, the Ice, Cloud, and Land Elevation Satellite-2 — or, the "ICESat-2" — is perched atop a United Launch Alliance Delta II rocket, and when it assumes its orbit, it will study ice layers at Earth's poles, using its only payload, the Advance Topographic Laser Altimeter System (ATLAS).
SMARTER FASTER trademarks owned by The Big Think, Inc. All rights reserved.