A Real Cure For the Auto Industry
Noam Avram Chomsky was born in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania on December 7, 1928. He attended the University of Pennsylvania where he studied linguistics, mathematics, and philosophy. In 1955, he received his Ph. D. from the University of Pennsylvania, however, most of the research leading to this degree was done at Harvard between 1951 and 1955. Since receiving his Ph. D., Chomsky has taught at Massachusetts Institute of Technology, where he now holds the Ferrari P. Ward Chair of Modern Language and Linguistics.
Among his many accomplishments, he is most famous for his work on generative grammar, which developed from his interest in modern logic and mathematical foundations. As a result, he applied it to the description of natural languages.
His political tendencies toward socialism and anarchism are a result of what he calls "the radical Jewish community in New York." Since 1965 he has become one of the leading critics of U.S. foreign policy. He published a book of essays called American Power and the New Mandarins which is considered to be one of the most substantial arguments ever against American involvement in Vietnam.
Topic: Re-tooling the auto industry
Noam Chomsky: The government is continuing the process of effectively dismantling the productive core of the American economy, like the automobile industry. That's part of the general financialization, the shift of power to finance, to Wall Street, that's been going on for about 30 years. So it's not being destroyed, it's just domestically being destroyed. Maybe the same corporations will produce abroad. Well, that's happening right now. It's causing a disaster in places like Michigan and Ohio and Indiana. It's destroying homes, families, communities.
Meanwhile, while this is happening, Obama's Secretary of Transportation [Ray LaHood], is in Europe visiting Spain, trying to work out contracts whereby, say Spain, can use federal stimulus money, taxpayer money, to provide the infrastructure and the technology and the equipment, for high-speed rail transport, which we desperately need. If the world's going to survive, we're going to have to get off the commitment to very wasteful use of fossil fuels. That's a state corporate social engineering project that began in the 1940s and it's leading right to disaster.
Society is going to have to be reconstructed massively and one crucial part of it is high-speed transit. Here we have the government and the corporate sector, dismantling the sector of the industrial apparatus, that could very well produce high-speed transit. The automobile industry could be re-tooled for high-speed transit. Much more radical steps have been taken. So during the Second World War, the industry was almost totally converted to war production in a kind of semi-command economy, it was very successful. American industrial production almost quadrupled. It could surely be done here.
But instead of doing that, which would make sense for the population and for our grandchildren—it would help preserve a liveable environment—instead of doing that, Obama is sending his Transportation Secretary to use taxpayer money to get the Spanish to do it for us. As a commentary on the social and economic system, this is just devastating.
Have you seen a comment about it anywhere? No, because it's in the interests of the sectors, the few big interests that in fact do run the country, by now, mostly the financial sector. It's profitable for them. We don't even know what the public wants, because they're not even asked.
It's so remote from consciousness, but I suspect that people would support it and it certainly could be done.
Recorded on: Aug 18, 2009
While The Ford Motor Company made news this afternoon with its first quarterly profits in more than four years, Noam Chomsky explains why vague references to 'cost-cutting' and a dependence on government programs are exactly the wrong approach to fixing the industry's deep-seated problems.
New research links urban planning and political polarization.
- Canadian researchers find that excessive reliance on cars changes political views.
- Decades of car-centric urban planning normalized unsustainable lifestyles.
- People who prefer personal comfort elect politicians who represent such views.
Progressive America would be half as big, but twice as populated as its conservative twin.
- America's two political tribes have consolidated into 'red' and 'blue' nations, with seemingly irreconcilable differences.
- Perhaps the best way to stop the infighting is to go for a divorce and give the two nations a country each
- Based on the UN's partition plan for Israel/Palestine, this proposal provides territorial contiguity and sea access to both 'red' and 'blue' America
Science and the squishiness of the human mind. The joys of wearing whatever the hell you want, and so much more.
- Why can't we have a human-sized cat tree?
- What would happen if you got a spoonful of a neutron star?
- Why do we insist on dividing our wonderfully complex selves into boring little boxes
SMARTER FASTER trademarks owned by The Big Think, Inc. All rights reserved.