Michael Schrage and the Duty to Protect Citizens From Cyber Attack

The United States has a long history of using force to defend the property and interests of its citizens. MIT Research Fellow Michael Schrage asks why responses to cyberattacks deviate from that precedent.

The United States has a long history of using force to defend the property and business interests of its citizens. This strategy has often led to controversy, especially when the military arm of America stretches abroad. But time and time again, the U.S. government has levied threats of invasion and conflict to protect the interests of its citizens.

MIT Research Fellow Michael Schrage asks why responses to cyberattacks on U.S. businesses deviate from that precedent. He explains his perspective in the following Big Think interview:

The recent history of worldwide cyberconflicts has Schrage thinking about a couple key topics:

"One is that ordinary citizens should be concerned about whether their data assets — and that includes everything from their social security numbers to their bank accounts to the way their mortgage is held. They should be concerned about how adequately protected that is. But not just — and this is important — not just by the financial institution or the retail institution, but by government."

One of the reasons we pay taxes is because our social contract places the responsibility for defense in the government's hand. Our tax dollars support efforts to protect citizen well-being. What Schrage is asking is where we draw the line that separates national security from e-security. Has that line already been crossed? Was there ever a line to begin with? Are the two inextricably linked?

"I believe this is a policy and a question of great, not just national import, but global import because America is a leading nation both in terms of technology and in terms of vulnerability and it raises important questions about what constitutes self-defense in this regard."

From here, Schrage voices the opinion that major cyberattacks shouldn't be treated simply as crimes to be investigated by the FBI. Hacking isn't just silly vandalism, he says. It's intentional malice that harms Americans and their assets. "Not cool," says Schrage. Not cool indeed.

For more from Michael Schrage, check out his new book The Innovator's Hypothesis, as well as his profile at Leigh Bureau.

NYTimes exposé reveals how Facebook handled scandals

Delay, deny and deflect were the strategies Facebook has used to navigate scandals it's faced in recent years, according to the New York Times.

(Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
Politics & Current Affairs
  • The exhaustive report is based on interviews with more than 50 people with ties to the company.
  • It outlines how senior executives misled the public and lawmakers in regards to what it had discovered about privacy breaches and Russian interference in U.S. politics.
  • On Thursday, Facebook cut ties with one of the companies, Definers Public Relations, listed in the report.
Keep reading Show less

Russian reporters discover 101 'tortured' whales jammed in offshore pens

Protected animals are feared to be headed for the black market.

Politics & Current Affairs
  • Russian news network discovers 101 black-market whales.
  • Orcas and belugas are seen crammed into tiny pens.
  • Marine parks continue to create a high-price demand for illegal captures.
Keep reading Show less

What would happen if America defaulted on its debt?

Sure we know it would be bad, but what do all of these scary numbers really mean?

Politics & Current Affairs
  • At the press time, the value was $21.7 trillion dollars.
  • Lots of people know that a default would be bad, but not everybody seems to get how horrible it would be.
  • While the risk is low, knowing what would happen if a default did occur is important information for all voters.
Keep reading Show less