Barney Frank and the Polemic Power of Laughter
Ridicule, says Frank, was one of his greatest weapons in Congress. The retired Massachusetts congressman shares how humor can help win friends and arguments.
Retired Massachusetts Congressman Barney Frank was known in Washington for his political savvy, zealous dedication to financial policy, and razor sharp wit. In his recent Big Think interview, Frank explains the power of humor in politics and discourse. This lesson applies to all professions and ways of life. If you want to persuade, make sure humor is in your arsenal.
Frank breaks down the advantages of humor into two points. First, there's a ton of value in levity. Making people laugh means making people feel good and loyalty brews between people who enjoy each other's company. This isn't a groundbreaking concept by any means but Frank makes sure to point out that humor is an effective way to make friends when friends are needed. He would know. A Washington politician needs friends as sorely as anyone.
The second benefit of humor is in its polemic power:
"People say a lot of things politically. If you say something very funny it's more likely to be remembered and it can get your political point across."
Frank recalls a quip he made about President Ronald Reagan's efforts to defund programs that helped poor children. Frank referenced the president's stance on abortion and said something to the effect of, "I now understand the Republican view. In their head life begins at conception but it ends at birth." Frank notes his quip is remembered is for its form as much as its substance. If he had blustered and filibustered while densely articulating every possible permutation of his position, no one today would remember a thing he said. This is the power of clear and concise humor.
Finally, Frank discusses another form of humor that served him well during his career: ridicule:
"Ridicule is about the most powerful weapon possible rhetorically. Nobody likes to be laughed at. Nobody likes to be made fun of. And if people are making an argument or taking a set of positions that expose them to ridicule, if you can make fun of them that's also very effective."
While it's not necessarily advisable to start employing ridicule during your middle manager meetings, it's certainly a means by which an effective wordsmith can sway opinion and behavior. One example that comes to mind is this Daily Show clip featuring fans of the Washington Redskins. Much of the polemic power of Jon Stewart or Stephen Colbert lies in their ability to make intellectual opponents look dumb. Whether this mode is nice or not (it's really not) is beside the point. Frank's goal when utilizing ridicule was always to emerge victorious in a war of words. That's why it's a weapon, not a parlor trick.
Swipe right to make the connections that could change your career.
Swipe right. Match. Meet over coffee or set up a call.
No, we aren't talking about Tinder. Introducing Shapr, a free app that helps people with synergistic professional goals and skill sets easily meet and collaborate.
A new study explores how certain personality traits affect individuals' attitudes on obesity in others.
- The study compared personality traits and obesity views among more than 3,000 mothers.
- The results showed that the personality traits neuroticism and extraversion are linked to more negative views and behaviors related to obesity.
- People who scored high in conscientiousness are more likely to experience "fat phobia.
The rise of anti-scientific thinking and conspiracy is a concerning trend.
- Fifty years later after one of the greatest achievements of mankind, there's a growing number of moon landing deniers. They are part of a larger trend of anti-scientific thinking.
- Climate change, anti-vaccination and other assorted conspiratorial mindsets are a detriment and show a tangible impediment to fostering real progress or societal change.
- All of these separate anti-scientific beliefs share a troubling root of intellectual dishonesty and ignorance.
The history of the Geneva Conventions tells us how the international community draws the line on brutality.
- Henry Dunant's work led to the Red Cross and conventions on treating prisoners humanely.
- Four Geneva Conventions defined the rules for prisoners of war, torture, naval and medical personnel and more.
- Amendments to the agreements reflect the modern world but have not been ratified by all countries.
SMARTER FASTER trademarks owned by The Big Think, Inc. All rights reserved.