How to Build Self Control in a Preschooler

Children whose parents were responsive at 18 months of age show more extended and imaginative play at four years, while children whose parents were directive spend more time in the immature pattern of merely touching or looking at toys.

Play is serious business for young children. When preschoolers stage a tea party for stuffed animals or visit the moon in a rocket ship, they’re doing more than giving their parents a moment’s peace. They’re improving their cognitive abilities, as the Russian psychologist Lev Vygotsky suggested almost a century ago.

This sort of play gives children an early experience of regulating their own behavior to achieve an internally motivated goal. Make-believe games have rules: an astronaut can’t act like a baby, and a school teacher can’t act like a firefighter. If a child fails to behave appropriately, the game won’t go smoothly, and playmates are likely to complain.

To play imaginary games, children must negotiate with others to plan scenarios, suppress their impulses to stay within the agreed boundaries, simulate emotions, and envision the consequences of a variety of actions. Presumably because of extensive practice in these skills, children who participate in complex, imaginative play are better at language, figuring out what others are thinking and feeling, social competence, and cognitive flexibility.

Such complex behavior needs to be learned. Before age three, toddlers’ main partners for imaginary games are their parents, who gradually help children improve their play abilities. A key skill for parents in promoting imaginative play is following the child’s lead.

Rather than directing the play, parents should respond with ideas that flow from the child’s actions. For example, when a toddler puts her Barbie into a cup, a responsive parent might ask, “Is the doll going for a swim?” A directive parent might say, “Dolls don’t belong in the water. They go in the dollhouse.” Children whose parents were responsive at 18 months of age show more extended and imaginative play at four years, while children whose parents were directive spend more time in the immature pattern of merely touching or looking at toys.

Children learn best when support from parents (or teachers) allows them to achieve slightly more advanced results than they could manage alone. Effective parents offer hints, prompts, and strategies when the child seems to be stuck, while allowing the child to do as much as possible independently. Psychologists call this approach “scaffolding” after the construction technique that provides temporary support for buildings as they’re going up. As the child becomes more capable, the parent backs off to let the child take control of the newly learned skill, while continuing to offer support for more difficult tasks as needed.

Providing support for children’s autonomy, rather than giving orders or taking over the task, encourages children to develop initiative and take responsibility for their own behavior. Similar approaches are effective across many areas of development, from learning to get along with
other children to completing homework assignments.

At home or at school, other games with rules—such as board games or red light/green light—also reward children for strengthening their self-regulation ability through practice. The diabolical Reverse Simon Says is particularly effective (“If Simon says touch your nose, you have to touch your toes” and so on).

Research shows that two preschool programs originally designed to help the disadvantaged, Montessori and Tools of the Mind, build children’s ability to regulate their own actions. The programs share an emphasis on self-motivated behavior in a structured context, allowing children to choose activities that interest them from among a limited set of options. The environment is both warm and orderly, and teachers provide support aimed at promoting independence and improving cognitive abilities in a developmental sequence.

Tools of the Mind, based on Vygotsky’s work, uses structured imaginary play, along with a variety of scaffolding techniques, to build self-control. Children who were randomly assigned to one or two years of Tools of the Mind preschool showed substantially better performance on a demanding cognitive control task at age five than children in another preschool program with similar academic content. Parents can use many of these techniques at home—such as asking the child to hold a picture of a mouth when it’s his turn to talk and an ear when it’s time to listen.

Traditional Montessori education does not encourage imaginary play because Maria Montessori believed that it was better for children to participate in real activities, though some modern programs are more flexible in this regard. The Montessori curriculum, though, does present progressively more challenging activities that children find engaging, thus following the basic principles of self-control training. One study found that children who were assigned to Montessori preschool by lottery at age three showed more cognitive flexibility and better social cognition two years later than children who lost the lottery and went to other schools.

Preschool self-control is important because it’s a major element of school readiness, but even in older children, it’s not too late to improve self-control. Next week’s post will explore how to do that.

Image courtesy of Shutterstock.

Algorithmic catastrophe: How news feeds reprogram your mind and habits

The most powerful editors in the world? Algorithms.

Sponsored by Charles Koch Foundation
  • According to a Pew Research poll, 45% of U.S. adults get at least some of their news from Facebook, with half of that amount using Facebook as their only news outlet.
  • Algorithms on social media pick what people read. There's worry that social media algorithms are creating filter bubbles, so that they never have to read something they don't agree with and thus cause tribal thinking and confirmation bias.
  • The Charles Koch Foundation is committed to understanding what drives intolerance and the best ways to cure it. The foundation supports interdisciplinary research to overcome intolerance, new models for peaceful interactions, and experiments that can heal fractured communities. For more information, visit
  • The opinions expressed in this video do not necessarily reflect the views of the Charles Koch Foundation, which encourages the expression of diverse viewpoints within a culture of civil discourse and mutual respect.
Keep reading Show less

Psychological gym experiment proves the power of mind over matter

It isn't mind over matter as much as mind properly working with matter.

DENVER, CO - MAY 16: Brian and Monica Folts workout on treadmills at Colorado Athletic Club Tabor Center on May 16, 2018 in Denver, Colorado. The couple runs marathons and compete in Ironman triathlons and train on on treadmills. (Photo by RJ Sangosti/The Denver Post via Getty Images)
Mind & Brain
  • A new Stanford study finds believing you have genetic predispositions for obesity and low exercise endurance changes your physiology.
  • Participants told they had a protective obesity gene had a better response than those told they did not, even if they did not actually have the gene.
  • Runners performed poorly after learning they did not have the gene for endurance, even if they actually have the gene.
Keep reading Show less

Why this 2015 NASA study is beloved by climate change skeptics

The findings of the controversial study flew in the face of past research on ice gains in Antarctica.

Politics & Current Affairs
  • A 2015 NASA study caused major controversy by claiming that Antarctica was gaining more ice than it was losing.
  • The study said that ice gains in East Antarctica were effectively canceling out ice losses in the western region of the continent.
  • Since 2015, multiple studies have shown that Antarctica is losing more ice than it's gaining, though the 2015 study remains a favorite of climate change doubters to this day.
Keep reading Show less