The English Department is instituting a series of reforms that cuts across the entire university.
- Rutgers University's English department is instituting anti-racist policies, workshops, and initiatives in solidarity with Black Lives Matter.
- Linguistic diversity and less emphasis on "traditional" grammar will be honored across the department's courses.
- Jonathan Holloway, the college's first Black president, said the school name will not change despite slaves having built the original institution.
Black Lives Matter Protests Around the World<span style="display:block;position:relative;padding-top:56.25%;" class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="ed4639cbe7898cc2539d6c15704b1f70"><iframe type="lazy-iframe" data-runner-src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/4Vl4I0weXPU?rel=0" width="100%" height="auto" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" style="position:absolute;top:0;left:0;width:100%;height:100%;"></iframe></span><p><strong>Undergraduate English</strong> will require that English majors take a course in African-American Literature (more on this below). During the coming semester, the department is offering 14 such courses, including Black Speculative Fiction and Afro-Futurism. </p><p><strong>Creative Writing </strong>will offer a class about reading and writing on race and require professors to take a workshop on creating an anti-racist classroom.</p><p><strong>Graduate English</strong> is placing emphasis on course proposals that focus on the history of racial injustice in America, as well as initiatives that offer graduate students opportunities to work with prisons, public schools, and community organizations as a form of political activism. </p><p><strong>The Center for Cultural Analysis</strong> has committed to working with and supporting Black-owned businesses, and will be sponsoring a number of new working groups, initiatives, and exhibitions around race, including the working group, "Slavery + Freedom." It will also emphasize the experience of Asian students during the immigration crisis and the racialization of the current pandemic. </p><p>While these (and many more) changes appear exhaustive, such initiatives are generations in the making. The New Brunswick campuses have long been exceptionally diverse. (I'll leave Newark and Camden aside in these examples). In 1995, we held numerous protests over <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/1995/02/02/nyregion/at-rally-students-seek-resignation-of-rutgers-president.html" target="_blank">racially-insensitive remarks</a> by then-president, Fran Lawrence, which included blocking Route 18 while marching to his Piscataway residence, and a basketball court sit-in to bring awareness to the systemic problem of racism. There were also numerous "Take Back the Night" rallies and marches addressing systemic abuse and harassment of women, predating #metoo by a generation.</p>
Demonstrators stage protest in the Loop before marching to the private residence of Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker on July 10, 2020 in Chicago, Illinois.
Photo by Scott Olson/Getty Images<p>Interestingly, I spent a few semesters in the English Department before switching to Religion. The best class I took while at Rutgers was "African-American Literature," taught by the incomparable Guyanese-born scholar, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ivan_Van_Sertima" target="_blank">Ivan Van Sertima</a>. Instead of demanding we read numerous books and articles, Van Sertima assigned just one book—Ralph Ellison's "The Invisible Man"—which we spent the entire semester dissecting and discussing. His approach was a breath of fresh air: going deep instead of shallowly skimming a breadth of literature. </p><p>Here's why I left the department: African-American Literature did not count toward an English degree.</p><p>A quarter-century later, such a class is now required for an English degree. Seemingly little steps forward have real-world consequences, especially at an institution like Rutgers. A racially-diverse university does not guarantee racism-free campuses. In fact, Jonathan Holloway, who recently took the helm as Rutgers' first Black president, is not shying away from <a href="https://www.nj.com/education/2020/06/we-have-a-problem-rutgers-new-president-speaks-out-on-racism.html" target="_blank">calling out systemic racism</a>. </p><p>Not everyone is happy about these changes, though the noise is mostly coming from conservative blogs. Their argument is predictable (hampering education) and ineffective. A contingent of American society seems perpetually concerned with an imagined "Golden Age," which in this case translates as maintaining the dominant white, Europ</p><p>ean model of language. Their concern is relatively confined to <a href="https://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/article/prescriptive-grammar" target="_blank">prescriptive grammar</a> that influenced Europe and America in the 18th and 19th centuries. </p><p>Linguistics evolved to investigate <a href="https://www.thoughtco.com/theoretical-grammar-1692541" target="_blank">theoretical grammar</a> in the 20th century, which is more applicable in the decision at Rutgers. The purpose of language is to communicate an idea. You can do this through pantomime, of course, but language has always been a living process, not an arcane museum piece. Different people use similar languages to communicate to their peers. </p><p>Grammar has suffered in the social media age. People's inability to differentiate between <em>there</em>, <em>their</em>, and <em>they're</em> and <em>your</em> and <em>you're</em> is the source of constant frustration. I'll fight for the serial comma until the end of my days. But when someone doesn't use one, I generally understand what they're trying to communicate. These are minor debates in a vast world of divergent speakers. </p>