Trolls undermine the credibility of authors and publications, researchers say

The impact of abusive comments is "significant."

Trolls undermine the credibility of authors and publications, researchers say
Image source: Maxpixel
  • It's well known that abusive comments online happen to women more than men.
  • Abusive comments, a new study finds, has a "significant" impact on the credibility of both authors and news outlets.
  • Some news organizations already heavily moderate or even ban comments entirely; this should underscore that effort.

In a study published by Taylor & Francis Online, and written by researchers Kathleen Searles, Sophie Spencer and Adaobi Duru, it's quite clear that abusive and "uncivil" comments — such as, "UR a commie libtard and you eat babies! Go die!" — negatively affect perception of both a publication and its authors.

Survey says ...

DreamWorks Troll dolls are displayed as Hamleys announce its top ten toys for Christmas at Hamleys on October 6, 2016 in London, England. Photo by Tristan Fewings/Getty Images

The study began with the knowledge that women journalists and authors receive a disproportionately higher amount of attacks, hostile comments, and abuse than men. This is well established, and continues to be a major problem on the Internet, especially Facebook. (Sometimes, it's angry, drunk, or... psychologically challenged people. Sometimes, it's trolls.)

But what they found is that such abusive comments will negatively affect perceptions of the publication itself, as well as the author of an article, regardless of the reporter's gender.

We found a significant effect for the abusive comment on author credibility and intention to seek news from the author and outlet in the future, but gender of the author did not moderate these effects.

"Ur" comment section, redux

A man uses Facebook on a mobile phone in Yangon on June 7, 2018. - Facebook has blacklisted a group of Myanmar Buddhist hardliners including monks notorious for bilious hate speech against Rohingya Muslims (Photo by Ye Aung THU / AFP)

What that means is that abusive comments in response to articles affect perceptions of the credibility of a social media page, publication, author, etc., no matter the gender of the author.

Of course, because women authors are more likely to receive such hate means that the net negative effects of such "speech" affect women more than men, but the perception change felt by readers seeing such comments is not affected by the gender of the author.

In other words, it's all bad.


What's a publication (Page, Group, etc.) to do?

The comments are from this author's own Facebook page. Original creation using screen captures and an image from Pixabay.

One of the key takeaways that many publications have taken from the last few years is to post a thing at the top, or prominently on the page, or pinned somewhere in the comments, that says hate speech and abuse is not allowed and will be deleted. This puts the bad guys on notice, but more importantly, it tells people in advance that this is a place where someone is paying attention to all of that. It leads to more comments and prevents some problematic comments, according to an article in Civil Servant.

Other publications simply do not allow comments; especially when dealing with political content, it requires nearly full-time moderation.

Meanwhile, Here Are Some Hilarious Comment Comebacks

Not suitable for work, but hilarious.

From 1.8 million years ago, earliest evidence of human activity found

Scientists discover what our human ancestors were making inside the Wonderwerk Cave in South Africa 1.8 million years ago.

Inside the Kalahari Desert Wonderwerk Cave

Credit: Michael Chazan / Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Surprising Science
  • Researchers find evidence of early tool-making and fire use inside the Wonderwerk Cave in Africa.
  • The scientists date the human activity in the cave to 1.8 million years ago.
  • The evidence is the earliest found yet and advances our understanding of human evolution.
Keep reading Show less

Big think: Will AI ever achieve true understanding?

If you ask your maps app to find "restaurants that aren't McDonald's," you won't like the result.

Credit: GABRIEL BOUYS via Getty Images
Mind & Brain
  • The Chinese Room thought experiment is designed to show how understanding something cannot be reduced to an "input-process-output" model.
  • Artificial intelligence today is becoming increasingly sophisticated thanks to learning algorithms but still fails to demonstrate true understanding.
  • All humans demonstrate computational habits when we first learn a new skill, until this somehow becomes understanding.
Keep reading Show less

How cell phone data can help redesign cities

With the rise of Big Data, methods used to study the movement of stars or atoms can now reveal the movement of people. This could have important implications for cities.

Credit: Getty Images
13-8
  • A treasure trove of mobility data from devices like smartphones has allowed the field of "city science" to blossom.
  • I recently was part of team that compared mobility patterns in Brazilian and American cities.
  • We found that, in many cities, low-income and high-income residents rarely travel to the same geographic locations. Such segregation has major implications for urban design.
Keep reading Show less
Mind & Brain

The never-ending trip: LSD flashbacks and a psychedelic disorder that can last forever

A small percentage of people who consume psychedelics experience strange lingering effects, sometimes years after they took the drug.

Quantcast