Trolls undermine the credibility of authors and publications, researchers say
The impact of abusive comments is "significant."
- It's well known that abusive comments online happen to women more than men.
- Abusive comments, a new study finds, has a "significant" impact on the credibility of both authors and news outlets.
- Some news organizations already heavily moderate or even ban comments entirely; this should underscore that effort.
In a study published by Taylor & Francis Online, and written by researchers Kathleen Searles, Sophie Spencer and Adaobi Duru, it's quite clear that abusive and "uncivil" comments — such as, "UR a commie libtard and you eat babies! Go die!" — negatively affect perception of both a publication and its authors.
Survey says ...
DreamWorks Troll dolls are displayed as Hamleys announce its top ten toys for Christmas at Hamleys on October 6, 2016 in London, England. Photo by Tristan Fewings/Getty Images
The study began with the knowledge that women journalists and authors receive a disproportionately higher amount of attacks, hostile comments, and abuse than men. This is well established, and continues to be a major problem on the Internet, especially Facebook. (Sometimes, it's angry, drunk, or... psychologically challenged people. Sometimes, it's trolls.)
But what they found is that such abusive comments will negatively affect perceptions of the publication itself, as well as the author of an article, regardless of the reporter's gender.
We found a significant effect for the abusive comment on author credibility and intention to seek news from the author and outlet in the future, but gender of the author did not moderate these effects.
"Ur" comment section, redux
A man uses Facebook on a mobile phone in Yangon on June 7, 2018. - Facebook has blacklisted a group of Myanmar Buddhist hardliners including monks notorious for bilious hate speech against Rohingya Muslims (Photo by Ye Aung THU / AFP)
What that means is that abusive comments in response to articles affect perceptions of the credibility of a social media page, publication, author, etc., no matter the gender of the author.
Of course, because women authors are more likely to receive such hate means that the net negative effects of such "speech" affect women more than men, but the perception change felt by readers seeing such comments is not affected by the gender of the author.
In other words, it's all bad.
What's a publication (Page, Group, etc.) to do?
One of the key takeaways that many publications have taken from the last few years is to post a thing at the top, or prominently on the page, or pinned somewhere in the comments, that says hate speech and abuse is not allowed and will be deleted. This puts the bad guys on notice, but more importantly, it tells people in advance that this is a place where someone is paying attention to all of that. It leads to more comments and prevents some problematic comments, according to an article in Civil Servant.
Other publications simply do not allow comments; especially when dealing with political content, it requires nearly full-time moderation.
Meanwhile, Here Are Some Hilarious Comment Comebacks
Not suitable for work, but hilarious.
- Internet Trolls Have an Unlikely New Ally: The U.S. Supreme Court ›
- Who Are Internet Trolls? Psychologists Build a Profile ›
Political activism may get people invested in politics, and affect urgently needed change, but it comes at the expense of tolerance and healthy democratic norms.