Psychology Tells Us There Are 2 Kinds of Politically Correct People

A new study says there are two main categories of politically correct people – PC egalitarian and PC authoritarian.

Psychology Tells Us There Are 2 Kinds of Politically Correct People


The idea of political correctness is ubiquitous, lurking beneath virtually all of public conversation. Even people who strongly oppose it are just as aware, if not more so, of its presence and ever-changing boundaries. Still, the question that remains largely unanswered is: Who exactly are the politically correct?   

That’s the focus of a recent study conducted by Jordan Peterson and Christine Brophy of the University of Toronto’s Department of Psychology.

Peterson and Brophy created a 192-item survey that measured PC-related language, beliefs and emotional sensitivity. The survey was completed by 332 participants, who also responded to questionnaires that measured personality, IQ, and disgust sensitivity.

The researchers found a few common threads among the politically correct. People who agreed with the statement It is important for me to be politically correct” were likely to be non-White females who reported high levels of compassion. And, according to the survey, they were also likely to be particularly sensitive to offensive subject matter.  


Beyond that, Peterson and Brophy suggest politically correct people fall into two main groups: PC Authoritarianism and PC Egalitarianism. Here’s how they distinguish the two, in part:

PC Egalitarians 

  • Believe cultural forces are responsible for group differences
  • Think differences among groups arise from societal injustice
  • Support policies and ideas that prop up historically disadvantaged groups
  • Show high emotional response to discriminating language 
  • Have a higher vocabulary and openness to new experiences
  • Are likely to identify with historically disadvantaged groups
  • Desire a more diverse, democratic governance
  • PC Authoritarians 

  • Believe biological forces are responsible for group differences
  • Demonstrate a lower vocabulary and more likely to be religious 
  • Support censorship of offensive material and harsher punitive justice
  • Express a general desire to achieve security for people in distress
  • Show a higher need for order, and a higher sensitivity to disgust
  • Are likely to report a mood or anxiety disorder in themselves or family
  • Desire a more uniform society through autocratic governance

  • One of the most interesting things about the findings is the personality overlap between PC Authoritarians and right-wing authoritarians. Scott Barry Kaufman, scientific director of the Imagination Institute and a researcher and lecturer in the Positive Psychology Center at the University of Pennsylvania, explains:

    A common finding in the psychological literature is a positive association between conservative belief and sensitivity to disgust. In the current study, contamination disgust and the order and traditionalism dimension were all related, suggesting a greater similarity between PC-Authoritarians and Right-Wing authoritarians than either side would probably like to admit!

    Also, another interesting similarity is the higher levels of a diagnosed anxiety or mood disorder found among PC-Authoritarians. Both PC-Authoritarians and Right-Wing Authoritarians tend to show a heightened fear response to both social and personal threats, with the strongest fear response being towards instances of social difference.

    Authoritarianism on both sides of the political spectrum is commonly associated with an outlook that perceives the world to be a threatening place. The researchers suggest this outlook might explain why PC Authoritarians feel a need to protect themselves and others from material they consider offensive. Peterson also thinks high levels of compassion can lead to authoritarian stances

    Compassion is widely understood to be an evolutionary adaptation that facilitates the mother-child bond. For instance, a mother bear feels compassion for her cubs because, for them, the outside world is full of threats from which she’s compelled to protect them. This type of compassion serves a clear purpose. But what happens when people with high levels of compassion try to map this trait onto larger society, not just onto family members? Peterson elaborates on this idea in the video below:

    Check out some of the questions listed on the survey below:

    PC-Egalitarianism

  • Anti-Establishment Diversity (.89)
  • Rate your level of agreement with the following statements:

    The quality of social services available to this country’s citizens has remained the same, despite refugees/immigrants entering.

    Refugees/Immigrants are as entitled to subsidized housing or subsidized utilities (water, electricity) as this country’s “poor” citizens are.

    The values and beliefs of refugees/immigrants regarding family issues and socializing children are basically quite similar to that of citizens of this country.

    2. Biological-Cultural Based Differences (.60) (PC-Egalitarians rank those as rooted in culture)

    Rate the degree you think each of the following facts is a biological or cultural phenomenon:

    Women are on average more agreeable and nurturing than men.

    Men have better spatial ability than women.

    On average, individuals who identify as “white” score higher than those of African ancestry on IQ tests.

    3. Societal Injustice (.59)

    Rate the degree you think each of the following facts is evidence of an unjust system:

    Only 5% of the Fortune 500 companies have women as CEOs.

    There have been no Black prime ministers in Canada or the UK, and the United States has only had one Black president.

    Only 8% of registered nurses in the United States are male.

    PC-Authoritarianism

  • Censorship Area (.70)
  • Do you believe the works in these categories should be screened for offensive, racist, sexist, or otherwise discriminatory language and/or ideas?

    Books

    Movies

    Art

    2. Coddling (.65)

    Rate your level of agreement with the following statements:

    Universities should be required to provide safe spaces for lectures/events discussing potentially sensitive/unsettling material.

    Students should be allowed to request a safe space when material on campus makes them uncomfortable.

    Businesses should be required to provide safe spaces for employees.

    3. Patriarchy Censorship (.60)

    Rate your level of agreement with the following statements:

    Feathered headdresses should be banned from music festivals.

    White people should not wear their hair in cornrows or afros because it is cultural appropriation.

    White musical artists winning awards for reggae, rap, hip-hop, and jazz, is exploitation and appropriation of Black cultural art forms.

     

    ‘Designer baby’ book trilogy explores the moral dilemmas humans may soon create

    How would the ability to genetically customize children change society? Sci-fi author Eugene Clark explores the future on our horizon in Volume I of the "Genetic Pressure" series.

    Surprising Science
    • A new sci-fi book series called "Genetic Pressure" explores the scientific and moral implications of a world with a burgeoning designer baby industry.
    • It's currently illegal to implant genetically edited human embryos in most nations, but designer babies may someday become widespread.
    • While gene-editing technology could help humans eliminate genetic diseases, some in the scientific community fear it may also usher in a new era of eugenics.
    Keep reading Show less

    Designer uses AI to bring 54 Roman emperors to life

    It's hard to stop looking back and forth between these faces and the busts they came from.

    Meet Emperors Augustus, left, and Maximinus Thrax, right

    Credit: Daniel Voshart
    Technology & Innovation
    • A quarantine project gone wild produces the possibly realistic faces of ancient Roman rulers.
    • A designer worked with a machine learning app to produce the images.
    • It's impossible to know if they're accurate, but they sure look plausible.
    Keep reading Show less

    Ten “keys to reality” from a Nobel-winning physicist

    To understand ourselves and our place in the universe, "we should have humility but also self-respect," Frank Wilczek writes in a new book.

    Photo by Andy HYD on Unsplash
    Surprising Science
    In the spring of 1970, colleges across the country erupted with student protests in response to the Vietnam War and the National Guard's shooting of student demonstrators at Kent State University.
    Keep reading Show less

    This is your brain on political arguments

    Debating is cognitively taxing but also important for the health of a democracy—provided it's face-to-face.

    Antifa and counter protestors to a far-right rally argue during the Unite the Right 2 Rally in Washington, DC, on August 12, 2018.

    Credit: Zach Gibson/AFP via Getty Images
    Mind & Brain
    • New research at Yale identifies the brain regions that are affected when you're in disagreeable conversations.
    • Talking with someone you agree with harmonizes brain regions and is less energetically taxing.
    • The research involves face-to-face dialogues, not conversations on social media.
    Keep reading Show less
    Surprising Science

    2020 ties for hottest year on record, says NASA and NOAA

    In a joint briefing at the 101st American Meteorological Society Annual Meeting, NASA and NOAA revealed 2020's scorching climate data.

    Scroll down to load more…
    Quantcast