10 Indian Thinkers and Why You Should Know Them.

India is a vast land, rich in history, beauty, and great ideas. Here, we want to introduce you to ten great minds in Indian thought. These ten thinkers span thousands of years, include several religions, and more than a few fields of expertise.

India is a vast land, rich in history, beauty, and great ideas. Here, we want to introduce you to ten great minds in Indian thought. These ten thinkers span thousands of years, include several religions, and more than a few fields of expertise.


 

  • Parshvanatha (7th or 8th century BCE)

    The flag of Jainism, each stripe represents a divinity as well as an ethical command. Source

    The first teacher of Jainism to be generally recognized as a historical individual, as he is mentioned not only in Jainist texts but in Buddhist works as well. Parshvanatha was a monk who taught for 70 years, and had a wide group of followers. His followers have four restraints: non-violence, non-theft, non-possession, and non-lying, as opposed to the five ethical commands found in other strains of Jainism. He also supported the idea that monks could wear clothes, in opposition to other schools which advocated strict ascetism. A quick introduction to Jainism can be found here.

    Souls render service to one another. -  A proverb of Jainism. 

  • The Buddha (563 BCE- 483 BCE)


    Siddhartha Gautama, the founder of Buddhism, was born into north Indian nobility and was raised for a life of luxurious rulership and conquest. After discovering that suffering existed in the world outside his palace, he renounced his titles and became a monk; living a life of extreme ascetism in stark contrast to his former royal excess. After years of meditation, he achieved enlightenment and began to preach the four noble truths about the nature of suffering and the way to escape it; by means of the middle way between hedonistic excess and severe asceticism. More information on Buddhism can be found here.


    Righteousness, when well-practiced, brings happiness. Truth is the sweetest of flavours. They say the life of one living by wisdom is the best.

  •  Chanakya (4th century BCE)

    The Maurya Empire, which Chanakya helped to establish, at its territorial height. 

    A Philosopher and statesman, Chanakya wrote the Arthashastra, an ancient text on political economy which has been compared favorably to the work of Machiavelli; as it focuses on keeping a ruler in power by means of wise rule and empowerment of the poor and not merely wicked statecraft. As an adviser to the emperor Chandragupta Maurya, he was one of the chief architects of the Maurya Empire, which would come to dominate the subcontinent for 150 years and would be led by the great Ashoka at its apex. 

    "If a king is energetic, his subjects will be equally energetic. If he is reckless, they will not only be reckless likewise, but also eat into his works. Besides, a reckless king will easily fall into the hands of his enemies. Hence the king shall ever be wakeful."

  •  Adi Shankara (8th century)


    A theologian who unified several fields of thought in Advaita Vedanta Hinduism, whose ideas on the soul and enlightenment continue to be influential. He wrote several notable commentaries on Hindu holy texts, including the ten principal Upanishads and the Bhagavad Gita. His theology often focused on the issue of how Moshka could be achieved in life, and he argued that liberation was possible for a self-realized person. He toured India extensively during his short life, and debated many other philosophers in his travels. An introduction to Hinduism can be found here

    "Knowledge of the Self is the one direct means for liberation."

  • Guru Nanak (1469 – 1539)



    The founder of Sikhism who is revered as “The First Guru” of the faith. Born near what is now Lahore, Pakistan in 1469; he preached meditation on the one god, the unity of mankind, service to others, honest conduct, and living a simple life. His teachings were recorded at the time, and collected by other gurus to form almost one thousand of the hymns in the Sikh holy book, the Guru Granth Sahib. For those who would like an introduction to Sikhism, a video introduction is available here.

    “Make compassion the cotton, contentment the thread, modesty the knot and truth the twist.”

  •  Rabindranath Tagore (1861-1941)


    The first non-European to win the Nobel Prize in Literature, and only the second person outside of Europe to win any such prize. Tagore was a noted poet, painter, musician and political theorist. He was the founder of Visva-Bharati University. He traveled extensively, and interacted with other great minds such as Albert Einstein, H.G. Wells, and George Bernard Shaw. An early supporter of Indian Independence, he often worked with Gandhi and once prevented him from fasting to death by resolving a major dispute on the voting rights of untouchables.

    “Every person is worthy of an infinite wealth of love - the beauty of his soul knows no limit”

  • Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi (1869-1948)


    Mohandas K. Gandhi is known to the world as the saint of non-violent resistance and the father of Indian independence. He also laid out a comprehensive worldview in that offered an alternative to Western Civilization. Gandhian Economics calls for a change in focus from profit and material goods to spiritual development and self-sufficiency. His lifestyle of simple, communal living demonstrated a viable alternative to the westernization of Indian life which continues to this day.

    He desired that a single state be created out of the British Raj, and was disappointed to see the division of India and Pakistan. He was assassinated by a Hindu Nationalist who opposed his accommodating stances towards the Muslim minority.

    “It would be a good idea”. His alleged reply when asked for his opinion on Western Civilization.

  • Jawaharlal Nehru (1889 -1964)

    Prime Minister Nehru meets with U.S. President Eisenhower.

    An associate of Gandhi during the independence movement, president of the Congress Party in the late 1920’s, and the first Prime Minister of Independent India. He worked to centralize and modernize the Indian government and economy. A “scientific humanist” he worked to secularize India despite consistent opposition, enshrining the ideal of a “scientific temper” in the Indian Constitution.  Internationally, he co-founded the non-aligned movement, which remains active today. He was the father of Indira Gandhi who also became India’s Prime Minister.

    "Democracy and Socialism are means to an end, not ends in themselves."

  • Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar (1910-1995)

    A graph demonstrating the Chandrasekhar limit, for which he won the Nobel Prize. You can learn more about the science here

    Indian born astronomer and physicist who discovered the maximum mass of a stable white dwarf, now known as the Chandrasekhar limit, for which he won the 1983 Nobel Prize in Physics. His ideas were initially ridiculed; as it implied that too massive a star might collapse into a black hole an idea many astronomers objected to in the 1930’s.  He also worked extensively in the field of stellar evolution, was invited to join the Manhattan Project, and studied black holes and gravitational waves. 

    “It is, indeed an incredible fact that what the human mind, at its deepest and most profound, perceives as beautiful finds its realization in external nature.… What is intelligible is also beautiful.”

  •  Ravi Shankar (1920-2012)


    Considered one of the best sitarists and Indian composers of the 20th century, he was largely responsible for the popularization of Indian music, with its unique scales and half tones, with western audiences. He was the teacher and friend of George Harrison, who added Indian elements to the Beatles’ music as a result of that friendship. Shankar performed at many of the great music festivals of the 1960’s and 70’s, including Woodstock and The Concert for Bangladesh. He later found time to serve as a nominated member of the upper house of the Indian Parliament in honor of his artistic achievements. He was the father of noted musicians Norah Jones and Anoushka Shankar. Examples of his playing can be found here

    “The music to us is religion. The quickest way to reach godliness is through music.”

     

    'Upstreamism': Your zip code affects your health as much as genetics

    Upstreamism advocate Rishi Manchanda calls us to understand health not as a "personal responsibility" but a "common good."

    Sponsored by Northwell Health
    • Upstreamism tasks health care professionals to combat unhealthy social and cultural influences that exist outside — or upstream — of medical facilities.
    • Patients from low-income neighborhoods are most at risk of negative health impacts.
    • Thankfully, health care professionals are not alone. Upstreamism is increasingly part of our cultural consciousness.
    Keep reading Show less

    Elizabeth Warren's plan to forgive student loan debt could lead to an economic boom

    A plan to forgive almost a trillion dollars in debt would solve the student loan debt crisis, but can it work?

    Photo credit: Drew Angerer / Getty Images
    Politics & Current Affairs
    • Sen. Elizabeth Warren has just proposed a bold education reform plan that would forgive billions in student debt.
    • The plan would forgive the debt held by more than 30 million Americans.
    • The debt forgiveness program is one part of a larger program to make higher education more accessible.
    Keep reading Show less

    Yale scientists restore brain function to 32 clinically dead pigs

    Researchers hope the technology will further our understanding of the brain, but lawmakers may not be ready for the ethical challenges.

    Still from John Stephenson's 1999 rendition of Animal Farm.
    Surprising Science
    • Researchers at the Yale School of Medicine successfully restored some functions to pig brains that had been dead for hours.
    • They hope the technology will advance our understanding of the brain, potentially developing new treatments for debilitating diseases and disorders.
    • The research raises many ethical questions and puts to the test our current understanding of death.

    The image of an undead brain coming back to live again is the stuff of science fiction. Not just any science fiction, specifically B-grade sci fi. What instantly springs to mind is the black-and-white horrors of films like Fiend Without a Face. Bad acting. Plastic monstrosities. Visible strings. And a spinal cord that, for some reason, is also a tentacle?

    But like any good science fiction, it's only a matter of time before some manner of it seeps into our reality. This week's Nature published the findings of researchers who managed to restore function to pigs' brains that were clinically dead. At least, what we once thought of as dead.

    What's dead may never die, it seems

    The researchers did not hail from House Greyjoy — "What is dead may never die" — but came largely from the Yale School of Medicine. They connected 32 pig brains to a system called BrainEx. BrainEx is an artificial perfusion system — that is, a system that takes over the functions normally regulated by the organ. The pigs had been killed four hours earlier at a U.S. Department of Agriculture slaughterhouse; their brains completely removed from the skulls.

    BrainEx pumped an experiment solution into the brain that essentially mimic blood flow. It brought oxygen and nutrients to the tissues, giving brain cells the resources to begin many normal functions. The cells began consuming and metabolizing sugars. The brains' immune systems kicked in. Neuron samples could carry an electrical signal. Some brain cells even responded to drugs.

    The researchers have managed to keep some brains alive for up to 36 hours, and currently do not know if BrainEx can have sustained the brains longer. "It is conceivable we are just preventing the inevitable, and the brain won't be able to recover," said Nenad Sestan, Yale neuroscientist and the lead researcher.

    As a control, other brains received either a fake solution or no solution at all. None revived brain activity and deteriorated as normal.

    The researchers hope the technology can enhance our ability to study the brain and its cellular functions. One of the main avenues of such studies would be brain disorders and diseases. This could point the way to developing new of treatments for the likes of brain injuries, Alzheimer's, Huntington's, and neurodegenerative conditions.

    "This is an extraordinary and very promising breakthrough for neuroscience. It immediately offers a much better model for studying the human brain, which is extraordinarily important, given the vast amount of human suffering from diseases of the mind [and] brain," Nita Farahany, the bioethicists at the Duke University School of Law who wrote the study's commentary, told National Geographic.

    An ethical gray matter

    Before anyone gets an Island of Dr. Moreau vibe, it's worth noting that the brains did not approach neural activity anywhere near consciousness.

    The BrainEx solution contained chemicals that prevented neurons from firing. To be extra cautious, the researchers also monitored the brains for any such activity and were prepared to administer an anesthetic should they have seen signs of consciousness.

    Even so, the research signals a massive debate to come regarding medical ethics and our definition of death.

    Most countries define death, clinically speaking, as the irreversible loss of brain or circulatory function. This definition was already at odds with some folk- and value-centric understandings, but where do we go if it becomes possible to reverse clinical death with artificial perfusion?

    "This is wild," Jonathan Moreno, a bioethicist at the University of Pennsylvania, told the New York Times. "If ever there was an issue that merited big public deliberation on the ethics of science and medicine, this is one."

    One possible consequence involves organ donations. Some European countries require emergency responders to use a process that preserves organs when they cannot resuscitate a person. They continue to pump blood throughout the body, but use a "thoracic aortic occlusion balloon" to prevent that blood from reaching the brain.

    The system is already controversial because it raises concerns about what caused the patient's death. But what happens when brain death becomes readily reversible? Stuart Younger, a bioethicist at Case Western Reserve University, told Nature that if BrainEx were to become widely available, it could shrink the pool of eligible donors.

    "There's a potential conflict here between the interests of potential donors — who might not even be donors — and people who are waiting for organs," he said.

    It will be a while before such experiments go anywhere near human subjects. A more immediate ethical question relates to how such experiments harm animal subjects.

    Ethical review boards evaluate research protocols and can reject any that causes undue pain, suffering, or distress. Since dead animals feel no pain, suffer no trauma, they are typically approved as subjects. But how do such boards make a judgement regarding the suffering of a "cellularly active" brain? The distress of a partially alive brain?

    The dilemma is unprecedented.

    Setting new boundaries

    Another science fiction story that comes to mind when discussing this story is, of course, Frankenstein. As Farahany told National Geographic: "It is definitely has [sic] a good science-fiction element to it, and it is restoring cellular function where we previously thought impossible. But to have Frankenstein, you need some degree of consciousness, some 'there' there. [The researchers] did not recover any form of consciousness in this study, and it is still unclear if we ever could. But we are one step closer to that possibility."

    She's right. The researchers undertook their research for the betterment of humanity, and we may one day reap some unimaginable medical benefits from it. The ethical questions, however, remain as unsettling as the stories they remind us of.

    Supreme Court to hear 3 cases on LGBT workplace discrimination

    In most states, LGBTQ Americans have no legal protections against discrimination in the workplace.

    (Photo by Andres Pantoja/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images)
    Politics & Current Affairs
    • The Supreme Court will decide whether the Civil Rights Act of 1964 also applies to gay and transgender people.
    • The court, which currently has a probable conservative majority, will likely decide on the cases in 2020.
    • Only 21 states and the District of Columbia have passed laws effectively extending the Civil Rights of 1964 to gay and transgender people.
    Keep reading Show less