Archaeologists Have a Huge New Stonehenge to Figure Out

A massive complex of ancient stone structures is uncovered in remote Kazakhstan.

Archeologists have a new mystery to solve in Kazakhstan, a complex of stone structures reminiscent of Stonehenge but much bigger. The site is the size of 200 American football fields, about 300 acres. It was discovered in 2010 by a man identified as F. Akhmadulin, who was exploring the sagebrush desert area in Altÿnkazgan on the Mangÿshlak Peninsula along the eastern shore of the Caspian Sea with a metal detector.



Akhmadulin came across a piece of an ancient silver saddle and some other bits inside some stones. He brought his find to archaeologist Andrey Astafiev, of the Mangistaus State Historical and Cultural Reserve.


When Astafiev and Evgeniï Bogdanov, of the Russian Academy of Sciences Siberian Department's Institute of Archaeology and Ethnography, visited the area to which Akhmadulin had pointed them, it was easy to see that there was something here worthy of investigation.

Visible indicators (LIVE SCIENCE)

Excavation would have to wait, however, according to the scientists’ published research: “Unfortunately, the socioeconomic situation in the region is not one in which it is easy to engage in archaeological research, and it was not until 2014 that the authors of this article were able to excavate certain features within the site.”

When they were finally able to explore the site, they uncovered a complex of structures of “stone slabs inserted vertically in the ground” extending well beyond what they expected. Some of the stones are as large as 34 by 24 meters, and others are as small as just 4 meters. Many sport carvings, and some don’t.

So the fundamental mystery is just whose site is this? So far, the saddle seems to be the strongest evidence.


An analysis of its saddle’s carvings suggests it dates from about 1,500 years ago, when the Roman Empire was collapsing and the Huns were marauding across Asia and Europe. Astafiev and Bogdanov think it’s likely the saddle belonged to a Hun, and someone of importance since there are high-status indicators called “tamgas” engraved on the saddle’s surface. They believe the saddle artwork is hand-carvings in leather that were impressed into silver plates laid over them. The scientists also wonder if the saddle was left in a stone structure as part of a ritual or funeral. (One skeleton has been found under the stones.) 

Other possibilities are that the saddle was left at the site at a later time, or that the site was built by one of the local populations that fled in the face of the Huns.

The purpose of the entire sprawling complex remains a mystery for now. Bogdanov told Live Science that, "I hope that one day there [will be] a film about the archaeological excavations on the Mangÿshlak, about ancient civilizations and modern inhabitants.”

A dark matter hurricane is crashing into Earth

Giving our solar system a "slap in the face"

Surprising Science
  • A stream of galactic debris is hurtling at us, pulling dark matter along with it
  • It's traveling so quickly it's been described as a hurricane of dark matter
  • Scientists are excited to set their particle detectors at the onslffaught
Keep reading Show less

Compelling speakers do these 4 things every single time

The ability to speak clearly, succinctly, and powerfully is easier than you think

Former U.S. President Barack Obama speaks during a Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee rally at the Anaheim Convention Center on September 8, 2018 in Anaheim, California. (Photo by Barbara Davidson/Getty Images)
Personal Growth

The ability to communicate effectively can make or break a person's assessment of your intelligence, competence, and authenticity.

Keep reading Show less

New study reveals what time we burn the most calories

Once again, our circadian rhythm points the way.

Photo: Victor Freitas / Unsplash
Surprising Science
  • Seven individuals were locked inside a windowless, internetless room for 37 days.
  • While at rest, they burned 130 more calories at 5 p.m. than at 5 a.m.
  • Morning time again shown not to be the best time to eat.
Keep reading Show less