A Mysterious Signal Was Likely Generated by the Military. Or Aliens.

SETI researchers have found a major radio telescope signal and are trying to nail down where it’s from.

Astronomer Claudio Maccone, one of the intrepid number-crunchers affiliated with the SETI Institute (Search for Extra-Terrestrial Intelligence) was poring over data from the RATAN-600 radio telescope at Zelenchukskaya, in southern Russia. SETI researchers have been sifting through massive radio-telescope data dumps for years looking for strong radio signals that could signal alien civilizations. And Maccone found a whopper. He characterized it as "a strong signal in the direction of HD164595." That’s a star almost as big as our sun that’s about 95 light years off in space. It’s believed to be about 6.3 billion years old. Since we already know of one planet orbiting the star, HD 164595 b, why not another, inhabited, one?


Needless to say, the signal bears further investigation, though there are reasons to think it’s coming from somewhere on earth. For one thing, the signal’s frequency is 11 GHz, which is—hm—within the frequency range used by the military. Not that anything is known to use 11 GHz specifically. According to Texas A&M astronomer Nick Suntzeff, though, ”God knows who or what broadcasts at 11Ghz, and it would not be out of the question that some sort of bursting communication is done between ground stations and satellites.”

And here’s another thing that’s both discouraging and thrilling at the same time. Most known astronomical signals are at a much lower frequency, that’s the bad news. On the other hand, it would take a huge amount of power to produce. Like a very advanced civilization.

Meet the Kardashevs.

The Kardashev scale is a way to measure the sophistication of possible extraterrestrial civilizations. It was developed by Soviet-era astronomer Nikolai S. Kardashev and first presented in his 1963 paper Transmission of Information by Extraterrestrial Civilizations. If SETI’s signal is narrowly aimed at us, a Kardashev I civilization would be required to produce it. If it’s omnidirectional, or “isotropic,” though, it would take a Kardashev II-level society.

Kardeshev I Civilization

According to the original paper, a Type I civilization would be at a “technological level close to the level presently attained on the Earth, with energy consumption 4 x 1019 erg/sec." Speaking to io9, physicist Michio Kaku says that these days, however, a Type I civilization is one that’s harnessed all of the power its home planet offers, to the extent of reconfiguring the planet to extract all of its energy. Not so much us. Yet.

Kardeshev II Civilization

A Type II has moved beyond its own energy to capture every bit of juice from its parent star. With a Dyson sphere, maybe?

Kardeshev III Civilization

A Type III has colonized its entire galaxy and has harnessed all of its power. A big jump, to say the least — it’s estimated that it would take a civilization from 100,000 to 1 million years to get from a Type II to a Type 3.

SETI HQ (SETH SHOSTACK)

So back to SETI. It’s obvious, then, why scientists are taking this seriously, investigating the signal very carefully so as not to jump to the wrong conclusion. Scientists are trying to make sure no background noise is causing a misidentification of the signal, and the researchers at RATAN-600 are suggesting that this area of space be closely monitored on a permanent basis. And who can blame them?

LinkedIn meets Tinder in this mindful networking app

Swipe right to make the connections that could change your career.

Getty Images
Sponsored
Swipe right. Match. Meet over coffee or set up a call.

No, we aren't talking about Tinder. Introducing Shapr, a free app that helps people with synergistic professional goals and skill sets easily meet and collaborate.

Keep reading Show less

26 ultra-rich people own as much as the world's 3.8 billion poorest

The Oxfam report prompted Anand Giridharadas to tweet: "Don't be Pinkered into everything's-getting-better complacency."

Getty Images and Wikimedia Commons
Politics & Current Affairs
  • A new report by Oxfam argues that wealth inequality is causing poverty and misery around the world.
  • In the last year, the world's billionaires saw their wealth increase by 12%, while the poorest 3.8 billion people on the planet lost 11% of their wealth.
  • The report prompted Anand Giridharadas to tweet: "Don't be Pinkered into everything's-getting-better complacency." We explain what Steven Pinker's got to do with it.
Keep reading Show less

People who constantly complain are harmful to your health

Moans, groans, and gripes release stress hormones in the brain.

Photo credit: Getty Images / Stringer
popular

Could you give up complaining for a whole month? That's the crux of this interesting piece by Jessica Hullinger over at Fast Company. Hullinger explores the reasons why humans are so predisposed to griping and why, despite these predispositions, we should all try to complain less. As for no complaining for a month, that was the goal for people enrolled in the Complaint Restraint project.

Participants sought to go the entirety of February without so much as a moan, groan, or bellyache.

Keep reading Show less
Videos
  • Facebook and Google began as companies with supposedly noble purposes.
  • Creating a more connected world and indexing the world's information: what could be better than that?
  • But pressure to return value to shareholders came at the expense of their own users.
Keep reading Show less