Do Godless Kids Turn Out All Right?

Do Godless Kids Turn Out All Right?


An op-ed piece in the Los Angeles Times by sociologist Phil Zuckerman supplied a reassuring answer for secular parents: absolutely. In the face of a previous study finding that children raised in religious homes have “better self-control, social skills, and approaches to learning than kids with nonreligious parents,” Zuckerman laid out the good news for secular families. “Far from being dysfunctional, nihilistic, and rudderless without the security and rectitude of religion,” he wrote, “secular households provide a sound and solid foundation for children.” Here are the details:

  • There are “high levels of family solidarity and emotional closeness between parents and nonreligious youth.”
  • There is evidence of “strong ethical standards and moral values that had been clearly articulated as they were imparted to the next generation."
  • Irreligious societies, “such as Sweden, Denmark, Japan, Belgium, and New Zealand ... have among the lowest violent crime rates in the world and enjoy remarkably high levels of societal well-being.”
  • A significant body of research shows that “secular grown-ups tend to be less vengeful, less nationalistic, less militaristic, less authoritarian, and more tolerant, on average, than religious adults.”
  • These conclusions stem from Zuckerman’s research and from studies conducted by Vern Bengston, a professor of gerontology and sociology at the University of Southern California. Zuckerman summarizes the upshot of his findings:

    My own ongoing research among secular Americans — as well as that of a handful of other social scientists who have only recently turned their gaze on secular culture — confirms that nonreligious family life is replete with its own sustaining moral values and enriching ethical precepts. Chief among those: rational problem-solving, personal autonomy, independence of thought, avoidance of corporal punishment, a spirit of “questioning everything,” and, far above all, empathy.

    I have no doubt that secular parents are perfectly capable of raising morally upstanding kids, and I am a big fan of rationality, inquisitiveness, autonomy, and the rest. Most of these are better construed as intellectual virtues, though, not “moral values and enriching ethical precepts.” And I have some trouble with the extremely broad brush Zuckerman uses to paint the landscape of religious and secular parenting. One line that particularly rankled me was this: “For secular people, morality is predicated on one simple principle: empathetic reciprocity, widely known as the Golden Rule.” Are America’s nonreligious parents an undifferentiated mass of moral educators? And are its pious households hotbeds of jingoism and militant intolerance? Might there be more than one way to be religious, or to be secular?

    For me, the best part about reading Zuckerman’s op-ed was the reminder it provided me of a book I loved in graduate school, Jean-Jacques Rousseau’s Emile, or On Education. In Book IV of Emile, Rousseau provides an account of a teaching he received from the priest of Savoyard at the break of dawn on a hill above the River Po, with “the immense chain of the Alps crown[ing] the landscape.” The message the Savoyard priest conveyed to Rousseau was, in a nutshell, this: God’s existence is not to be gleaned from books or religious authorities. Understanding God requires only the use of one’s senses and one’s reason. Teaching dogma is an inherently futile enterprise; you have to let children settle on their own array of beliefs:

    The greatest ideas of the divinity come to us from reason alone. View the spectacle of nature; hear the inner voice. Has God not told everything to our eyes, to our conscience, to our judgment? What more will men tell us? (Emile, Allan Bloom trans., p. 295).

    This constitutes a rejection of traditional religious education, and it entails, I think, an admonition to parents seeking to raise their children to believe, or not to believe, particular divine truths. It is one thing to re-enact and celebrate a religious culture and to expose children to the history, texts, and rites of a religion: that is the way cultural practices are reproduced over generations. But it is another thing to try to instill specific metaphysical conceptions into a child’s mind. Ultimately, the experience of coming to believe is internal, as John Locke emphasized in his Letter Concerning Toleration, and both governments and parents are ill-equipped and ill-suited to coerce young people to come to hold a particular view of the cosmos, or of the presence or absence of some kind of deity.

    What that means for how children “turn out” has to be a more nuanced story than Zuckerman tells. Rousseau’s injunction against the indoctrination of youth, and his celebration of setting kids free to find their own metaphysical path, runs both ways.

    Image credit: Shutterstock.com

     

     

    From 1.8 million years ago, earliest evidence of human activity found

    Scientists discover what our human ancestors were making inside the Wonderwerk Cave in South Africa 1.8 million years ago.

    Inside the Kalahari Desert Wonderwerk Cave

    Credit: Michael Chazan / Hebrew University of Jerusalem
    Surprising Science
    • Researchers find evidence of early tool-making and fire use inside the Wonderwerk Cave in Africa.
    • The scientists date the human activity in the cave to 1.8 million years ago.
    • The evidence is the earliest found yet and advances our understanding of human evolution.
    Keep reading Show less

    Big think: Will AI ever achieve true understanding?

    If you ask your maps app to find "restaurants that aren't McDonald's," you won't like the result.

    Credit: GABRIEL BOUYS via Getty Images
    Mind & Brain
    • The Chinese Room thought experiment is designed to show how understanding something cannot be reduced to an "input-process-output" model.
    • Artificial intelligence today is becoming increasingly sophisticated thanks to learning algorithms but still fails to demonstrate true understanding.
    • All humans demonstrate computational habits when we first learn a new skill, until this somehow becomes understanding.
    Keep reading Show less

    How cell phone data can help redesign cities

    With the rise of Big Data, methods used to study the movement of stars or atoms can now reveal the movement of people. This could have important implications for cities.

    Credit: Getty Images
    13-8
    • A treasure trove of mobility data from devices like smartphones has allowed the field of "city science" to blossom.
    • I recently was part of team that compared mobility patterns in Brazilian and American cities.
    • We found that, in many cities, low-income and high-income residents rarely travel to the same geographic locations. Such segregation has major implications for urban design.
    Keep reading Show less
    Mind & Brain

    The never-ending trip: LSD flashbacks and a psychedelic disorder that can last forever

    A small percentage of people who consume psychedelics experience strange lingering effects, sometimes years after they took the drug.

    Quantcast